|  | | 
01-26-2013, 07:15 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA | | | Modern Neck vs. Vintage Neck (Audio Clips) I was bored so I decided to record comparison clips of a "modern construction" neck with graphite rods and a "vintage construction neck" without. There still seems to be a few people who insist that graphite messes with the tone, so I'll let you guys be the judge.
Even with different neck woods they sound very, very, very close. MODERN NECK: Pau Ferro & Ebony Fingerstyle & Pick Audio VINTAGE NECK: Maple & Rosewood Fingerstyle & Pick Audio  | 
01-26-2013, 07:47 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: St. Louis, MO | | | Thank you. I rarely post, but I always enjoy your comparisons, Dan.
To my ear the modern neck has a smidge more bite to it, but they sound much more similar than different to me.
__________________ Quote: |
Originally Posted by JimmyM There is good money in playing music that musicians hate. | | 
01-26-2013, 08:43 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Australia | | | ^^ what he said.
The difference probably won't be heard when playing together with others.
__________________
Fernandes Club #34 | SX club member in good standing | The Lone Wolf Club #29
| 
01-26-2013, 09:08 PM
| | | | Agrees a little bit more bite or snap with the modern neck.
__________________
Life for its own carnal pleasure sake. Bass Guitar: Jackson JS3. Rotosound swing66 strings. Zoom club#2. Bass synths: Maudio Venom, & Novation KS4.
| 
01-26-2013, 09:12 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Across the creek from Cinci | | | Could the difference be more attributed to the ebony vs. the rosewood? I know that is a battle question but I had to ask.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by GrooveWarrior What nut's are those? | | 
01-26-2013, 09:33 PM
|  | Total Hyper-Elite Member Independent Contractor to Bass San Diego | | Join Date: May 2000 Location: Groom Lake, NV | | | I'm with the first two responses on this, but now who is to say which sounds better? As I usually respond to this sort of thing, no one would be able to discern the difference at a gig. The difference is so subtle that it takes a direct recording, bass only, and careful listening to hear it. Ultimately, so what?
Thanks for the clips, Dan.
__________________ I miss my butt! | 
01-26-2013, 09:33 PM
|  | Always groove.... | | Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Columbia, Md | | | Okay, I know that body wood doesn't contribute much to the tone but I've always held that the tone is in the neck. Fortunately, there is a little difference, but not much. So I think my train of thought is to go with the brighter neck and just roll down the tone (or treble) a bit.
Thanks for the clips!
__________________
-------
| 
01-26-2013, 09:41 PM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by stepswork4me Could the difference be more attributed to the ebony vs. the rosewood? I know that is a battle question but I had to ask. | That would only make a difference if you took the frets off. And even then it would be very subtle. Ebony is a little harder and would whine a bit more.
With frets, tho... well the clips tell the story.
LS | 
01-26-2013, 09:46 PM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Rhode Island , USA | | | Wow, this is surpising to me. The modern neck sound fuller, clearer, crisper and more defined. The vintage neck sounded rounder, warmer, and somewhat muffled. I think I would notice in a mix depending on what else is going on, i.e. presence of heavily distorted guitars.
__________________
Basses: Fender Am Std P5 (x2)
Amp: ShuttleMax 9.2, Fearless F115, F112
| 
01-26-2013, 09:48 PM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Rhode Island , USA | | | Ok, on second listen, I take my comments back. There is a difference, but not as much as I first thougt!!
__________________
Basses: Fender Am Std P5 (x2)
Amp: ShuttleMax 9.2, Fearless F115, F112
| 
01-26-2013, 09:53 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Hudson Valley, NY | | | Wow, you were bored. I preferred the graphite re enforced, whichever that was.
__________________
Official Fender Precision Bass Club #881, Gallien Krueger Official Club #921, N.Y. Bassists Club #52
| 
01-26-2013, 09:58 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Pittsburgh, PA | | | Can't say the result surprises me. Nice post! I'm still amazed that some people insist that wood makes a critical difference, but can't propose any possible explanation that actually makes sense.
The bad news: Now that you're finished with the tests, you can't possibly have a use for that bound & blocked neck. You'll have to mail it to me immediately for proper disposal. | 
01-26-2013, 09:59 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Pittsburgh, PA | | | | 
01-27-2013, 06:38 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: D'Shaw | | Quote:
Originally Posted by stepswork4me Could the difference be more attributed to the ebony vs. the rosewood? I know that is a battle question but I had to ask. | Don't forget the influence of the pao ferro vs maple which is the majority of the wood in the neck.
__________________
"It's a Crapshoot." The timbre is in the timber. It's a poor craftsman that blames his tools.
Last edited by mongo2 : 01-27-2013 at 06:40 AM.
| 
01-27-2013, 07:01 AM
| | | | Both sounded great. The modern did seem to have a little bit of extra somethin' somethin'. I liked the extra somethin' somethin' so I prefer the modern.
Thanks for doing this!
__________________
Ibanez club #418, SRX club #5, I like bass guitars club member # egg
| 
01-27-2013, 07:03 AM
| | | Humm,the diferences are not so far from each other,but to me i do prefer the vintage,more round and warm...
Nice playing 
Last edited by bassvid75 : 01-27-2013 at 07:05 AM.
Reason: Spealling
| 
01-27-2013, 07:11 AM
| | | | Interesting!
To me the vintage sounds more 'together' whereas the modern has a bit of a hollow quality to it's tone.
There really isn't much in it though, to my ear.
I prefer the vintage neck.
__________________
it's only music...but it sure is good for you.
| 
01-27-2013, 07:38 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Boston | | Quote:
Originally Posted by petrus61 Wow, you were bored. I preferred the graphite re enforced, whichever that was. | that made me laugh!
The first one was much more crisp clear and modern sounding. the bottom was classic warm rounded. I am surprised people couldnt tell a difference it was a huge difference!
__________________
Gallien-Krueger Club #925
I refuse to be the 1,046,234th member of the jazz bass club!
| 
01-27-2013, 07:50 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Dredmahawkus that made me laugh!
The first one was much more crisp clear and modern sounding. the bottom was classic warm rounded. I am surprised people couldnt tell a difference it was a huge difference! | "Huge" is a strong word. I'd say a huge difference would be the sound of an upright bass vs. a Modulus. That's not what we have here.
If I put these 2 clips in a typical mix with vocals and guitars you wouldn't be able to pick which is which. | 
01-27-2013, 08:20 AM
|  | Don't want no treble. | | Join Date: May 2012 Location: Southern California | | Funky! And agreed, in a mix one could never distinguish them. (Hoping I can play half that well someday!).
Thanks for posting.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnificentB I don't need to hear the notes. I just want to feel the floor shake. | Low-Wattage Tubesters #1/FSR #6/Crappy-Expensive #229/LOG #453/G&L #518/Mediocre #886/Precision #953/Jazz #1010/P&W #1202
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |