Peavey Cirrus vs. Ken Smith 5
I've owned the Peavey Cirrus in walnut and maple. Sold both because the tone was thin and lacking in the low end, though I liked how they played.
I have no experience with Ken Smith, and for the first time today played it at the store.
It was a neck tru version. I like how it played--thin body, nice neck. And generally I like how necktru basses play. I liked the tone too--very punchy, defined. And had a better, more organic low end than from what I remember about Cirrus.
Further, the smith has a more refined mid character. Whereas, from what I remember, the Cirrus had a grindy mid more appropriate for rock.
Is my general observation above correct how these two basses differ?