|  | | 
10-06-2011, 02:56 AM
| | | | Rosewood or Maple?
Sign in to disble this ad
Hey guys, i realise this is a personal preference type of thread/discussion and all, but i would love to get YOUR thoughts on why YOU prefer a Rosewood or Maple Neck? | 
10-06-2011, 03:23 AM
| | | | i prefer rosewood for its tone and feel for fretboard. I dont like fretboards with finish on them and maple boards require finish. Its also brighter toned then I want for fretbaord.
__________________
life for its own carnal pleasure. Bass: Jackson JS3. Bass strings: Rotosound swing66. Guitars: BC Rich. Guitar strings: Daddario XL nickel. Zoom club#2. BC Rich club#26.
| 
10-06-2011, 03:31 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Michigan | | | I make the decision base on the finish, does maple looks better or rosewood, my ears are so limited that I can't hear a difference between each other. | 
10-06-2011, 03:43 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Geneva | | | For personal taste is for maple, I'd find the sound more tight. Mapple and Rosewood can look good if it is a good bass so I suggest you to make your choice according to other factors (maybe confort).
Cheers | 
10-06-2011, 03:56 AM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by darkstorm i prefer rosewood for its tone and feel for fretboard. I dont like fretboards with finish on them and maple boards require finish. Its also brighter toned then I want for fretbaord. | An interesting idea was thrown out by someone a while back that maple boards aren't brighter than rosewood because maple is in and of itself brighter sounding but rather because the lamination of a rosewood board/maple neck is more dampened than a one piece maple neck. It makes some sense and a couple of experienced builders I know agreed when I asked them about it. One even thought that a maple board laminated onto a maple neck might be less bright sounding than a dense rosewood or ebony board.
I do prefer the unfinished feel of a rosewood or ebony board but sonically I don't care much what the board is if the bass sounds good and that is the combination of a bunch of factors.
Last edited by anonymous122511 : 10-06-2011 at 04:04 AM.
| 
10-06-2011, 07:22 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Norway | | The difference in tone is vastly overrated. There really isn't one. I prefer maple, based on looks alone. 
__________________
G&L Club member #149
| 
10-06-2011, 07:38 AM
|  | Remember 12/21/2012! ...it's my birthday! | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Cheviot, OH | | | Depends on what the color scheme of the bass is. I'd prefer rosewood with a sunburst finish and maple with black, white or natural.
__________________
Adam
Official Aguilar Club Founder; Spector Club #84
| 
10-06-2011, 07:53 AM
|  | aka Marky Potatoes | | Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA | | Tonally the difference is rather subtle to my ears (as with many things that people talk about when it comes to basses), a little brighter with a maple board. I pick more for the look.
As far as looks, I like maple a little more, but rosewood just seems to go better with some basses (lighter-colored, sometimes sunburst). To me, it seems maple is far less common these days - especially with the current advent we have over many new budget instruments and instruments with black painted headstocks.
__________________
Love for Bass Guitars & Software/Game Development in Brooklyn!
Fender Precision Bass #864
G&L #462
| 
10-06-2011, 09:27 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Chester, Pa.,USA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mytola The difference in tone is vastly overrated. There really isn't one. I prefer maple, based on looks alone.  | My position as well.
__________________
You can call me ...Cliff.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
| 
10-06-2011, 10:06 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: AZ mountains | | | I agree with tonal insignificance, at least to my ears. I play only fretless basses, with flats. I have maple, rosewood, and ebony boards. I like them all, and rotate my basses each gig just for the fun of it.
__________________
To each his own when it comes to tone.
| 
10-06-2011, 10:13 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: NY,NY | | I can deal with any, but given the choice, ebony by far is my preferred fretboard.
IMO, changes to tone are subtle at best, especially in the context of a band. I love ebony because it's very smooth and slick.
Maple too, is fun, but I dislike the laminated, glossy variety. EBMM gun-oil is more to my liking. It gets dirty quite fast though!
Rosewood is very nice, I love the look of it. Feels a bit more rough to me than the others. My brain wants to equate it with "warmth" in tone, so I like to roll off tone knob just a bit for the old school thump and feel  | 
10-06-2011, 10:18 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Wisconsin | | | I just ordered a SB4000 not too long ago and went with a Bridseye Maple 'board, mostly because I liked the way it looked but as people have said it is known to be a little bit brighter. For me thats hard to tell. Compared to my Jazz with a rosewood board the SB is brighter in passive mode. Although take into account the different pickups, body wood, strings, etc it is hard to truely compare.
I would love to hear from someone who had two exact basses except for the fretboards and see if they could tell the difference.
So for me I mostly like the look.
__________________
Wisconsin Bassists Club #97 Carvin Club #233 Fender Jazz Bass Club #743
"It ain't gunna hurt nobody to get on down!"-Wayman Tisdale
| 
10-06-2011, 10:22 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Ottawa, ON | | Quote:
Originally Posted by tri33 I just ordered a SB4000 not too long ago and went with a Bridseye Maple 'board, mostly because I liked the way it looked but as people have said it is known to be a little bit brighter. For me thats hard to tell. Compared to my Jazz with a rosewood board the SB is brighter in passive mode. Although take into account the different pickups, body wood, strings, etc it is hard to truely compare.
I would love to hear from someone who had two exact basses except for the fretboards and see if they could tell the difference.
So for me I mostly like the look. | Can You Tell The Difference??? MAPLE vs. ROSEWOOD
Can you tell the difference?
__________________
Current Gear: Epiphone Toby Standard IV / Gallien-Krueger MB200 / Epifani UL-110 Series 1
| 
10-06-2011, 10:30 AM
|  | Registered User | | | | | I like em both. To be honest a lot of times I buy a bass just by how it looks. After that, the neck profile comes into play. Then the sound. I really don't care about the board wood as long as it looks good. | 
10-06-2011, 10:40 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Close to Los Angeles, CA | | Rosewood. 
Smoothest neck EVER. | 
10-06-2011, 10:45 AM
|  | Fingers, pick, and a little bit of slap | | Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Terrapin country (Crofton, MD) | | Quote:
Originally Posted by line6man Rosewood. 
Smoothest neck EVER. | Gorgeous!
Rosewood is harder and denser than maple, so a neck made completely of rosewood will add a noticeable amount to overall weight, and possibly contribute to neck dive if the body is very light... but that's no big deal to many. | 
10-06-2011, 10:45 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Spokane, WA | | | I really dislike the look, feel, and tone of maple. Even on a natural finish body I prefer the look of a rosewood board (especially with a black pick guard), and maple always feels chunky to me, maybe because of the fact that it has a finish. As far as tone goes, I like the mellow sound of rosewood, and if I want more treb I'll just adjust it on my amp.
__________________
I don't care who the "best" bassist is, but Flea is my favorite!
myspace.com/austindavis
Last edited by saustindavis : 10-06-2011 at 10:52 AM.
| 
10-06-2011, 10:51 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Close to Los Angeles, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzbass Gorgeous!
Rosewood is harder and denser than maple, so a neck made completely of rosewood will add a noticeable amount to overall weight, and possibly contribute to neck dive if the body is very light... but that's no big deal to many. | It's also warmer than Maple. | 
10-06-2011, 10:56 AM
|  | I'm gonna love and tolerate the **** out of you! | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Memphis/Knoxville TN | | | I actually hear a huge tonal difference between the two - so much so that I'll pass up many good basses and deals because the neck on a bass is maple. Rosewood just seems to fill a mix better, whereas maple seems to give your bass a little bit more of a cut. | 
10-06-2011, 11:02 AM
|  | Fingers, pick, and a little bit of slap | | Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Terrapin country (Crofton, MD) | | | As for the original question: I agree that differences in tone between fretboards (on fretted basses, anyway) are minimal at best, even when all else is equal. I suggest that you don't worry about fretboard until you've got all the other factors sorted out: brand, model, pickups, etc. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |