|edpal ||01-08-2013 08:33 AM |
Single cutaway basses - is there some sonic difference.
I keep seeing single cutaway basses, you know where the upper bought runs right into the neck at about the 12 fret. I consider that upper bought very unattractive, like a whale head or something. And I cring at not having that space open. It also seems like it would cause some balance issues. But maybe I could show them some love if there was some great sonic difference. Is there something inherently different to that build style that changes tone? Not trying to start a throw-down, honestly curious.
|willbassyeah ||01-08-2013 08:39 AM |
no the balance of the singlecut is perfect, in fact the single cut design improves balance(if i am not wrong) and i dont think there is any sonic difference. A matter of preference i guess, some like blond, some like brunette, some like asian.
|KJung ||01-08-2013 08:40 AM |
Nope. It is a bit of a funky design, in that the top part of the neck is clamped to the body more than the bottom part of the neck, which you would thing might cause adjustment issues (some luthiers get around this, like Pete Skjold, by doing 'bolt on single cuts). However, I've yet to hear of this 'theorical issue' actually happening, so seems a non-issue.
So, mostly an aesthetic issue. I guess the one thing that it can do is allow the luthier to make a body with more wood/weight that is still small in an absolute sense.
Regarding playability up high, zero issue. I had a Fodera single cut for a while (and a Stambaugh), and the upper neck access and feel was identical to a more traditional design.
Long winded way of saying, if you dig the look, consider one. If you find one that sounds good, no downsides to that design if it at all worries you. And, finally, no reason to buy a single cut for anything other than looks.
|bassteban ||01-08-2013 08:46 AM |
I have a SC 6 string- to really answer the sonic diff Q one would need to A/B it w/an otherwise identical double-cut, so I don't know. It was the fashion at the time I had it built, I suppose... if you don't like it, that's a good enough reason to not get one, IMO, considering its likely strictly an aesthetics issue.
|edpal ||01-08-2013 08:54 AM |
Ok, thanks guys. I have seen a few that were fairly nice looking like Sudoka's. But those are premium instruments, so I would expect a premium experience. Cool, I'll try one out someday.
|Finbase ||01-08-2013 09:48 AM |
I own a single-cut De Gier Elevation. It has even and tight timber, if that makes any sense... I do recall that the builder himself stated that due to the SC design the overall tone would be relatively compressed. That pleasant compression is distinctive, IME!
It definitely sounds different than my Warmoth P-bass!:smug:
Send me a PM if you like, I could share some sound clips!
|chris.gotfunk ||01-08-2013 01:53 PM |
I may be wrong here, but I recently read that Anthony Jackson and Fodera first came up with this design to increase the rigidity of a 6 string bass neck. Anthony playing a 36" scale meant having a bit more length that when under tension, could result in more movement. Having the extra "meat" connected, stabilized the neck a bit more. Sonically... I have no idea what if any effects it has. Maybe a faster note response... Who knows?
|GODSBASSMAN ||01-08-2013 01:59 PM |
If the bass you are holding looks radically cool to you - you play better. (its in the brain and in the fingers.)
|jim777 ||01-08-2013 03:23 PM |
I also thought rigidity was the main upside, and possibly through that fewer dead spots? But honestly, I think mine is pretty cool looking :) lol
|All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 PM. || |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.