Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Basses [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-12-2010, 12:28 PM
Unrepresented's Avatar
Master of Reality
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Supporting Member
Stingray necks on non-Stingray bodies

Sign in to disble this ad
So, I've seen at least a couple basses on here that are MM/Fender hybrids, Fender32's JazzRay being the most famous in these parts. Would love to see some more examples of what can be done with a Stingray styled neck on a different body style.
__________________
BREAKHOUSE - Noise Purveyors of the Highest Order
  #2  
Old 12-12-2010, 01:02 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Area 51
Not a Stingray but for a couple of years I used an '89 Sabre neck on a Warmoth P bass body...sorry, no pix.
  #3  
Old 12-12-2010, 02:33 PM
fokof's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Supporting Member
Here's mine

A 80's MM neck , all maple with a Warmoth body.
It's a VB99 specific bass , has only a GK3 pickup , no magnetic.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bardley View Post
Does this mean if I think your tone sucks @$$ and you are ruining my mix I can come smash your bass on the floor?
Fretless member#31

Last edited by fokof : 02-09-2011 at 09:25 AM.
  #4  
Old 12-12-2010, 04:24 PM
Unrepresented's Avatar
Master of Reality
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gort View Post
Not a Stingray but for a couple of years I used an '89 Sabre neck on a Warmoth P bass body...sorry, no pix.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fokof View Post
Here's mine

A 80's MM neck , all maple with a Warmoth body.
It's a VB99 specific bass , has only a GK3 pickup , no magnetic.
Would love to hear about the results for either of these basses, regarding assembly issues (or lack thereof) and how the instruments worked out in terms of tone, playability, etc.
__________________
BREAKHOUSE - Noise Purveyors of the Highest Order
  #5  
Old 12-12-2010, 10:45 PM
fokof's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unrepresented View Post
Would love to hear about the results for either of these basses, regarding assembly issues (or lack thereof)
Warmoth doesn't do neck pockets for MM standard (they are Fender standard) so I ordered a 4 string body without any holes predrilled and had to chunk out some width for the neck.
Easy job if you have the right tools.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unrepresented View Post
and how the instruments worked out in terms of tone, playability, etc.
I absolutly love that MM neck.Playability is on par with what I had before that ; tops.
I tried to build a lightweight bass , so I went with Light Swamp Ash , there is a Walnut top for the looks and got lightweight Schaller tuners. The absence of mag pickup and electronics keeps the weight low.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bardley View Post
Does this mean if I think your tone sucks @$$ and you are ruining my mix I can come smash your bass on the floor?
Fretless member#31
  #6  
Old 12-13-2010, 04:29 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Area 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unrepresented View Post
Would love to hear about the results for either of these basses, regarding assembly issues (or lack thereof) and how the instruments worked out in terms of tone, playability, etc.
My Sabre neck fit was a perfect physical fit in the Warmoth neck pocket (trussrod adjustment on the Sabre neck is at the headstock). However, since the Sabre neck has a heel that extends further along the scale due to its extra fret and the Sabre had a 3 hole neck heel, the neck mounting holes on the Sabre didn't line up with the neck attachment holes in the Warmoth body and I drilled the holes required to mount the neck. I used a Warmoth body I already had, if I had ordered it specifically for the Sabre neck I would have ordered it without the neck holes drilled.

Also due to the extra fret, the neck was offset relative to the body compared to a standard 20 fret Fender neck for which the Warmoth neck pocket is cut. As a result, everything on the body was offset about 1/2" relative to the scale length including the pre-routed pickup cavity and the bridge screw holes so either the saddles or the whole bridge had to be moved about 1/2" closer to the the neck for proper intonation. I did both over time.

Since it was a P style body, it was no surprise to me that it pretty much sounded like a P bass should, inspite of the pickup offset.

If I was to do it again I'd extend the neck pocket into the body.

Last edited by Gort : 12-13-2010 at 04:45 AM. Reason: add content
  #7  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:14 AM
Unrepresented's Avatar
Master of Reality
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by fokof View Post
Warmoth doesn't do neck pockets for MM standard (they are Fender standard) so I ordered a 4 string body without any holes predrilled and had to chunk out some width for the neck.
Ah. I was going to ask if the 5 string MM neck fit the 5 string Fender styled neck pocket that Warmoth makes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fokof View Post
I absolutly love that MM neck.Playability is on par with what I had before that ; tops.
I tried to build a lightweight bass , so I went with Light Swamp Ash , there is a Walnut top for the looks and got lightweight Schaller tuners. The absence of mag pickup and electronics keeps the weight low.
Right on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gort View Post
My Sabre neck fit was a perfect physical fit in the Warmoth neck pocket (trussrod adjustment on the Sabre neck is at the headstock). However, since the Sabre neck has a heel that extends further along the scale due to its extra fret and the Sabre had a 3 hole neck heel, the neck mounting holes on the Sabre didn't line up with the neck attachment holes in the Warmoth body and I drilled the holes required to mount the neck. I used a Warmoth body I already had, if I had ordered it specifically for the Sabre neck I would have ordered it without the neck holes drilled.

Also due to the extra fret, the neck was offset relative to the body compared to a standard 20 fret Fender neck for which the Warmoth neck pocket is cut. As a result, everything on the body was offset about 1/2" relative to the scale length including the pre-routed pickup cavity and the bridge screw holes so either the saddles or the whole bridge had to be moved about 1/2" closer to the the neck for proper intonation. I did both over time.

Since it was a P style body, it was no surprise to me that it pretty much sounded like a P bass should, inspite of the pickup offset.

If I was to do it again I'd extend the neck pocket into the body.
Were you able to get proper intonation while using the extremes of the saddles in standard bridge location or was it necessary to relocate the entire bridge?

You didn't feel that the tone was impacted by having the pickup position shifted towards the bridge?
__________________
BREAKHOUSE - Noise Purveyors of the Highest Order
  #8  
Old 12-14-2010, 03:47 PM
fokof's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unrepresented View Post
Ah. I was going to ask if the 5 string MM neck fit the 5 string Fender styled neck pocket that Warmoth makes.
No. Not mine anyways. The neck I have is a narrow spacing one. (0.659" spacing)

They are very precise with their neck pocket dimentions ;
http://www.warmoth.com/Bass/Necks/faq2.aspx

My MM neck I have is a 5 string , I don't remember wich model it was.
I bought the neck only wich was brand new coming off a MM in '88 or '89
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bardley View Post
Does this mean if I think your tone sucks @$$ and you are ruining my mix I can come smash your bass on the floor?
Fretless member#31
  #9  
Old 12-14-2010, 04:41 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Area 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unrepresented View Post
Were you able to get proper intonation while using the extremes of the saddles in standard bridge location or was it necessary to relocate the entire bridge?

You didn't feel that the tone was impacted by having the pickup position shifted towards the bridge?
If I used a Badass II bridge it was fine in the standard location, with a Fender '62 RI bridge (my preferred bridge) I moved it to make intonation easier.

The tone was well within the range of tones I expect from P basses.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:42 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.