|  | 
12-13-2010, 12:42 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Zagreb (Croatia) | | | Warwick Streamer LX-5
Sign in to disble this ad
Any opinion and experieneces on this model?
Pics: 
__________________
Official U.S. Peavey Club Member #213
| 
12-13-2010, 09:37 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Zagreb (Croatia) | | | BUMP | 
12-13-2010, 10:03 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA | | | I have a Streamer LX 4 string, and I absolutey love it! The only reason I would get rid of it would be to trade for a Warwick 5 (Thumb or Streamer). I know the LX 5 is a little different tonally than the 4 (P vs. J neck pickup), but I personally think they still have enough similarities to compare. These are great basses. Very versatile, punchy, and aggressive. The 5 will have tight string spacing, but is very easy to get used to IMO, and can be widened at the bridge a little bit (each saddle is adjustable laterally). The curved and contoured body is very comfortable, and mine is very light (8.5lbs). Not sure what a LX 5 would weigh though. Umm...yeah, awesome bass. Highly recommended! | 
12-13-2010, 10:04 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: slovenia | | |
__________________
#86 in SPECTOR club
| 
12-13-2010, 10:09 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Zagreb (Croatia) | | Quote:
Originally Posted by TechJunky I have a Streamer LX 4 string, and I absolutey love it! The only reason I would get rid of it would be to trade for a Warwick 5 (Thumb or Streamer). I know the LX 5 is a little different tonally than the 4 (P vs. J neck pickup), but I personally think they still have enough similarities to compare. These are great basses. Very versatile, punchy, and aggressive. The 5 will have tight string spacing, but is very easy to get used to IMO, and can be widened at the bridge a little bit (each saddle is adjustable laterally). The curved and contoured body is very comfortable, and mine is very light (8.5lbs). Not sure what a LX 5 would weigh though. Umm...yeah, awesome bass. Highly recommended! | THNX man!!! Is the neck profile "baseball bat" like warwick necks today or is it thiner? | 
12-13-2010, 10:15 AM
|  | that video LIES | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Northern California | | | IME, all ovangkol necked Warwicks(like the one pictured)are thicker(front-to-back, not wider)than the older wenge necks. I've heard differing opinions, of course.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Albert He who throws mud only loses ground. | | 
12-13-2010, 10:29 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Upstate, South Carolina | | | My Streamer Jazzman LX (2009) has a tiny Jazz neck. Love it! | 
12-13-2010, 10:32 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: MD | | | I believe the 2008+ ovankal necks are slim. I just sold a $$ 5 string and it had a very similar neck profile as my streamer stage II with slim neck. Most of the baseball thick necks are from late 99-2007 models | 
12-13-2010, 10:57 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada | | Quote:
Originally Posted by seungkoo I believe the 2008+ ovankal necks are slim. I just sold a $$ 5 string and it had a very similar neck profile as my streamer stage II with slim neck. Most of the baseball thick necks are from late 99-2007 models | 2009 models and onward are slim
To the OP.
The streamer LX is one of my favorite Warwicks. It is similar to the Streamer stage II but fatter.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Campbell grand daddy used to say that the more he learned about people the better he liked horses | | 
12-13-2010, 11:01 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: MD | | | I dont know. I just had a 2008 corvette $$ 5 string and the neck was pretty slim. I definately know the difference because I had a 2001 thumb bo and tried numerous thick models as well as vintage warwicks. | 
12-13-2010, 11:15 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA | | | My LX 4 is a '99 and has an Ovangkol neck with a thinner profile than the '05 Thumb BO 4 and '04 Corvette 4. I've had an '03 and '08 Corvette 5 (Standard and $$ respectively) that had thick necks and an '09 'vette 5 std with a thin neck. I believe in 1999 they changed to the thick neck, but it seems not all '99's had thick. The change back to thin profile I thought happened in '09, so I was under the impression all '08's had thick necks. To be safe, if it's 2000-2007 I'd say it's a safe bet it'll be thick, and 1999 or 2008 could be hit or miss? | 
12-13-2010, 11:28 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Zagreb (Croatia) | | | This model up there is 2000.! | 
12-13-2010, 11:42 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Brooklyn, NY | | | owned a late-90's model for about 5 years. Liked it at first, it played incredibly, but fell out with it in the end. Muddy low-end, didn't like the artificial-mids it put out, high end was glassy/harsh and the D+G always sounding thin. Granted, I had moved to NYC where, in most of the work i was doing, showing up with a 5-string flame maple Warwick could get you fired. Still, I couldn't even consider keeping it around to do the modern Gospel, RnB, "session-guy-sound" thing. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |