Why aren't G&L basses more popular? - Page 31

lakefx · #**601** 12-20-2012, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by georgestrings

That's cool - whatever works for ya, bud... G&L makes a good instrument, no question about it...

Yeah, I was just pointing out the subjective nature of what we all do. It's part of what I love about playing, there is no right way, even if there are a lot of wrong ones

lakefx · #**602** 12-20-2012, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smcd

OMG, I really want an L-2000 in that color!

Pet Sounds · #**603** 12-20-2012, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red_Merkin

To my eye, they look BORING.

Every time I see a G&L, it's a natural finish on plain looking wood with a bunch of knobs and switches on the face. In short, it looks like somebody built it in their garage.

Compare that to Fenders and Stingrays that have muscle-car looks on top of a more manageable control scheme, and it's just no contest.

I pretty much agree. Personally, I find that many models look kind of generic, even those with cool finishes. Maybe it's the lack of pickguard on the L-2000, etc. I do like the SB-2. The controls IMO are APITA to dial in properly on the L-2000 and similar models. I've had two L-2000s, wanting to love them, and I just prefer a simple P-Bass.

bootsox · #**604** 12-20-2012, 08:00 PM

Leo got it right the first time, I don't see any reason to get a G&L or a Musicman when a Fender Precision is such a great choice

bootsox · #**605** 12-20-2012, 08:01 PM

not to mention that the headstock is butt ugly

rodneyat · #**606** 12-20-2012, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bootsox

Leo got it right the first time, I don't see any reason to get a G&L or a Musicman when a Fender Precision is such a great choice

Many will disagree. Which is why Leo himself continued to come up with new models. Different strokes for different folks. G&L, personally not my choice. But, it does not make it a bad choice for others. I do agree that a P is a great choice...look at my avatar. But, I also have a MM too. That said, none of them say Fender, Musicman or G&L on the headstock though.

willsellout · #**607** 12-20-2012, 08:23 PM

I'm sure glad this is a fashion contest.

zachoff · #**608** 12-20-2012, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pet Sounds

I pretty much agree. Personally, I find that many models look kind of generic, even those with cool finishes. Maybe it's the lack of pickguard on the L-2000, etc. I do like the SB-2. The controls IMO are APITA to dial in properly on the L-2000 and similar models. I've had two L-2000s, wanting to love them, and I just prefer a simple P-Bass.

Vol up, bass up, treble up, both pups, series, passive. Sounds huge. Cuts like a knife. Not trying to convince anyone... Just sayin'.

georgestrings · #**609** 12-20-2012, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smcd

I kinda see what you're saying, but I think that you might not be seeing the nicest examples.

I like the looks of the bottom two, but not the top two all that much - but that sort of thing is purely subjective...

- georgestrings

PluckyThump · #**610** 12-20-2012, 09:15 PM

Hey one of those looks familiar...

G&L has enough finish options (for USA at least) to make anyone happy.

I'm diggin' the Black Ice:

**Chef** · #**611** 12-20-2012, 09:25 PM

dang. that's wicked kewl.

justinellison3 · #**612** 12-20-2012, 09:26 PM

Every G&L bass I've ever played, I hated. I hate the tone and playability: too bright and thin

**Chef** · #**613** 12-20-2012, 09:27 PM

Wow, we had really different G&L's!!!
I almost always had the bass turnd down 50% or more to keep it from being too fat, and I like fat.

justinellison3 · #**614** 12-20-2012, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chef

Wow, we had really different G&L's!!!
I almost always had the bass turnd down 50% or more to keep it from being too fat, and I like fat.

I played whatever GC had lol

**RawOrange** · #**615** 12-20-2012, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bootsox

not to mention that the headstock is butt ugly

Perhaps the old headstock suits your fancy:

Templar · #**616** 12-20-2012, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bootsox

Leo got it right the first time, I don't see any reason to get a G&L or a Musicman when a Fender Precision is such a great choice

As if the Precision didn't undergo radical changes throughout its entire history. Leo was constantly revising and updating his designs, and continued to do so long after leaving Fender.

Whichever of Leo's creations works best for you is your choice. Personally, I find merit in all of them.

Templar · #**617** 12-20-2012, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PluckyThump

Hey one of those looks familiar...

G&L has enough finish options (for USA at least) to make anyone happy.

I'm diggin' the Black Ice:

Wow. G&L continues to dazzle. Beauty!

Oh wait, did I say beauty?

I meant "ugly as hell"....there's a little pointy thing on the headstock which spoils EVERYTHING!

**Chef** · #**618** 12-21-2012, 12:28 AM

Hey, nice new avatar there.

georgestrings · #**619** 12-21-2012, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PluckyThump

Hey one of those looks familiar...

G&L has enough finish options (for USA at least) to make anyone happy.

I'm diggin' the Black Ice:

That looks pretty nice - I could go for something like that, if the neck suited me, and I liked how it sounds...

- georgestrings

georgestrings · #**620** 12-21-2012, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Templar

Wow. G&L continues to dazzle. Beauty!

Oh wait, did I say beauty?

I meant "ugly as hell"....there's a little pointy thing on the headstock which spoils EVERYTHING!

Now, *to me* the "point" seems to work with that 3x2 headstock - not so much with the 4 on one side headstock...

- georgestrings