|
Yo Bill,
I've had the luxury of hanging out at the showroom in S.D. a coupla times now, and have played all of the various combinations of their pups (including a horrendous sounding prototype with a MM-style pup plopped right in the the middle of the body, instead of near the bridge). The J99s (which I have on mine) are definitely more beefy than the H50s, but you have the buzz to deal with. Personally, I'd rather live with the buzz and have the growl. I was underwhelmed by the MM-style pups; the were okay, but not noticeable "better" to me.
With that in mind, (like rickreyn) I'm seriously considering swapping out my J99s, but for a pair of Lane Poors. For those who remember me as being a shameless Carvin shill, this in no way implies dissatisfaction with my current setup - I'm just feeling an itch to personalize my bass a little more, and I've heard nothing but good things about Lane Poor. Plus, they have a 30 day return policy and a lifetime warranty, so I don't really have anything to lose. I have an email in to them now with some questions, and I'll let you know how it goes if I take the plunge. I guess I'm more curious than anything. I haven't played a bass yet that FELT better in my hands than a Carvin, but I want to make sure that I'm getting the best possible sound from it. And from what I've read out there, a Carvin with LPs is a great combination.
Any thoughts out there?
P.S. On my latest trip to the showroom, they had a super-cool looking prototype bass with a "spalted maple" top. I can't really describe it, but it was very, uh, spalty. Actually, it had a marble-like quality to it, and almost didn't look like wood. Anyway, it was neato, with regardless of the pickup combination.
|