|
 |

08-13-2002, 01:16 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Butler, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
fret calculator version 3.0
here is my third version of the fret calculator program, it now calculates fret distances for both inches and millimeters. It calculates distances both from the previous fret as well as from the nut. hope this can help somebody. it is a simple program and requires no spreadsheet programs, it also prints the output to a notepad file for easy printing. any suggestions for future versions of the program welcome.
|

08-13-2002, 01:55 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: US-NY-Rochester & NYC
|
|
|
new one
tps
Thanks for the new revision. More useful all the time!
After looking over the results of your (previous rev 2.0) program, and those from JP Basses' spreadsheet, I noticed that they were very close, but not identical. So I researched to find out the cause of the discrepancy. I turns out that not only does fret placement by successive division (which I assume you are using) by 17.817 introduce rounding errors, but that there are even other numbers being used! It turns out that the successive division method is "easier method" that approximates the actual exponential formula. (It is easier because it does not use exponents, just division, and so is easier to figure.) The actual formula, which produces the exact position (accurate within the digit limits of your spreadsheet, calculator or program) from the bridge to any fret, is:
dist(x) = s / (2 ^ (x/d) )
where
x = number of the fret being evaluated
dist(x) = distance from bridge to fret x
s = scale length (distance nut or zero fret to bridge)
d = number of divisions per octave ( = 12 in western music)
This produces the positions for the standard equal-tempered scale. The nut-to-fret positions and fret-to-fret positions are then produced by simple subtractions.
(There are no adjustments for string stretch, à la Buzz Feiten. These are the standard positions.)
I have taken the liberty of modifying the spreadsheet that JP Basses posted in the previous thread. (JP- hope that's OK with you, otherwise I'll gladly delete this.)
Here's the spreadsheet:
__________________
bass is :: the root of the rhythm :: the bottom of the beat :: the foundation of the feel :: ┃ | |·| |·| |·| |·| | |:| | |·| |·| |·| |·| | |:|
|

08-13-2002, 02:08 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Butler, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
where i got my math
I took my equations from a guitar/bass construction book and turned it into that program. in the book it suggested rounding off but in my program i used full length decimals and leave the rounding off to the user.
nut Distance starts out at 0.
rule = 17.817
{
distance = scale length / rule;
nut Distance = nut Distance + distance;
and then for the next fret
scaleLength = scaleLength - distance;
and start the equation over again.
}
the output matches the chart in the book only with a few more decimal places because my program does not round off like the book.
|

08-13-2002, 02:59 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Paris FRANCE
|
|
|
No problem Pilotjones! You're welcome.
I've just opened your excel file. Nice Job.
Anyway, I think that most guitar and bass builder use the simpler "rule of 18" (17.817) which provides a "good enough" fret positioning. Cutting fret slots by hand can't lead to 2 or 3 igits precision so...
I'm curious about which formula CNC equiped factory use!
JP
|

08-13-2002, 03:19 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: US-NY-Rochester & NYC
|
|
tps
A more exact number for the division method would be
rule = 17.8171537451057.
If you use this value you should find the numbers very close to perfect, e.g. 12th fret on 860mm scale = 430.000000x mm
(Maybe I'm getting a little too picky here!  )
JP
I imagine, if you were using CNC, why not be as exact as possible!

__________________
bass is :: the root of the rhythm :: the bottom of the beat :: the foundation of the feel :: ┃ | |·| |·| |·| |·| | |:| | |·| |·| |·| |·| | |:|
Last edited by pilotjones : 08-13-2002 at 03:23 PM.
|

08-14-2002, 01:02 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: lower mid Sweden
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by JP Basses
Anyway, I think that most guitar and bass builder use the simpler "rule of 18" (17.817) which provides a "good enough" fret positioning. Cutting fret slots by hand can't lead to 2 or 3 igits precision so...
|
There was a thread about fretless playing recently, where Steve Lawson asked: "How close to in tune is 'close enough'".
I believe this discrepancy is why I prefer playing fretless...unlined.
__________________
For better and for worse, 'til Kingdom comes.
www.suburban.se
Quote:
Originally Posted by Basschair
See what happens when you don't check out the FAQ section and use the search function?
|
|

12-27-2002, 07:26 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: WIlmington, NC
|
|
|
if you put in frets using that program what if your not exactly on target with the distance? will just a little mistake mess everything up?
__________________
counter culture (kount-ter kul-cher): a culture, espeicially of young people, with lifestyles or values in opposition of established culture.
|

12-28-2002, 04:32 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cottbus, Germany
|
|
|
action510 hat depends on what you think is a "little mistake". The error introduced by the division method is insignificant especially because the effect of the neck relief might even be bigger.
(BTW: That big number in my signature is the 12th root of 2)
|

12-30-2002, 03:54 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Atlanta/Loganville
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by action510
if you put in frets using that program what if your not exactly on target with the distance? will just a little mistake mess everything up?
|
Probably not. That's the difference between accuracy and precision! Besides, a fret saw is only .020" thick and with that thickness you can make a small error just in blade placement before you make the first draw with the saw. Add to that the possibility of crowning the fret a little off center and you begin to see how small errors are nearly impossible to avoid but would have little affect as long as they are centered on the proper location measurement.
|

08-21-2006, 08:30 PM
|
|
|
hi guys im new to this forum so not too sure how it works but im about to start making a bass and that spreadsheet would be really handy, how do i go about downloading it as its not showing up on the page
thanks a bundle and if anyone has it that they could email me it'd be much appreciated - email is labrat_66@hotmail.com
thankyou!
scott
|

08-21-2006, 09:33 PM
|
|
Registered User
Builder: Mailloux Basses
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
|
|
Google "wfret" and download the program.
|

08-22-2006, 01:32 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: lower mid Sweden
|
|
|
OR make your own from the formula Pilotjones states in the second post in this thread. It's very straightforward.
Then you can add info as you please.
__________________
For better and for worse, 'til Kingdom comes.
www.suburban.se
Quote:
Originally Posted by Basschair
See what happens when you don't check out the FAQ section and use the search function?
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|