Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Pickups & Electronics [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:28 PM
Pulplogic's Avatar
Pulplogic Pulplogic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego
Supporting Member
DIY Conductive Paint for Cavity Shielding

I recently stumbled onto an “Instructable” on how to make conductive paint from easily obtainable supplies (http://www.instructables.com/id/SEOH3GFFABRWUOD). I used a variation of this technique to fabricate a stretchable strain gauge for a non-bass related project. The results were promising, so I decided to try using a similar concoction for cavity shielding. While the electrical conductivity achieved using this method is not as high as foil tape it should provide respectable electromagnetic shielding.

The basic idea is to create a paintable mixture containing graphite powder. Since graphite is highly conductive the surface painted with the graphite will have a low resistance once dry. The formula I used was one part 3M Scotchkote Liquid Tape, 1.5 parts graphite powder, and 1 part Acetone. I created the mixture in small batches, just enough for one coat since the solution starts to setup in about 10 minutes. The solution was painted on in three coats using disposable acid brushes allowing 20 minutes between applications.

The materials can be purchased locally at most hardware stores in small quantities. I bought my supplies from McMaster-Carr mainly because they sell graphite powder by the pound (around $10).



Home Depot or Walmart will have something more like this:



The test subject is a recently purchased '76 P-bass that had been modded for EMG's before I bought her. My plan is to clean her up and outfit with custom active pickups / electronics and an aluminum control plate. Here is the body with the control cavity cleaned-up and threaded inserts installed.



Copper tape strips were laid down over the lip of the control cavity at the inserts to provide a conductive path to the control cover.



The liquid tape was mixed with the graphite using acetone as a thinner.



The control cavity and pickup routs after three coats of conductive paint.



After drying for one hour the resistance was measured across the length of the cavity. A resistance of less the 100 ohms was measured between any two points in the control cavity.



The resistance should continue to drop over the next 24 hours as the solvent evaporates. I will post an update with the final results.

--John
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:30 PM
vin*tone's Avatar
vin*tone vin*tone is offline
Here comes Mister Kidneys.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ballaarat, Victoria, OZ
Send a message via MSN to vin*tone
Supporting Member
Fantastic.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2009, 09:07 PM
xaxxat's Avatar
xaxxat xaxxat is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Supporting Member
Cool...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2009, 09:30 PM
line6man's Avatar
line6man line6man is online now
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Send a message via MSN to line6man
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pulplogic View Post
After drying for one hour the resistance was measured across the length of the cavity. A resistance of less the 100 ohms was measured between any two points in the control cavity.


It's definitely going to go way down when it dries, right?
Not to criticize, but 92.2 ohms is absolutely unacceptable.
Personally, I wouldn't be satisfied with any shielding job over an ohm.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2009, 09:36 PM
Jim C's Avatar
Jim C Jim C is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Supporting Member
Nice work.
Years ago I tested a number of materials and conductive paints in a shielded enclosure over a very wide frequency range looking at RF attenutaion.
As you pointed out, copper tape (especialy the embossed type) has a much higher RF attenuation potential than a coating.
While I don't recall the actual test results, I can tell you that any paint that has a low resistance / high RF attenuation is VERY expensive and usualy contains silver.

Thye down side of tape is that it is very difficult to line internal cavities with no or tight radiuses as it will tear easily. If you really want to go crazy, form a shield from copper shim stock and solder the corners.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-11-2009, 09:53 PM
PilbaraBass PilbaraBass is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gladstone, QLD, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by line6man View Post

It's definitely going to go way down when it dries, right?
Not to criticize, but 92.2 ohms is absolutely unacceptable.
Personally, I wouldn't be satisfied with any shielding job over an ohm.
it's a shield...not a current-carrying conductor...

On what criteria do you base your decision that 92 ohms is too much?

personally, I wouldn't go through the hastle of making a graphite paint when you can just use a zinc undercoat instead (available off the shelf)...
and Zinc also is a magnetic shield as well as electrical...

but, there's a huge misconception out there about what shielding actually does...
__________________
Carvin Club #60 P-Bass Club #487 Squier Club #???, Ibanez Club #482
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-11-2009, 10:03 PM
Pulplogic's Avatar
Pulplogic Pulplogic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by line6man View Post

It's definitely going to go way down when it dries, right?
Not to criticize, but 92.2 ohms is absolutely unacceptable.
Personally, I wouldn't be satisfied with any shielding job over an ohm.
You are right, it will certainly not yield the dc resistance of copper foil. As far as EMI attenuation, I am hopeful for acceptable results.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:14 PM.




Copyright ©1998-2009, TalkBass.com All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.