1. Welcome to TalkBass 2014! If you're new here, we just went through a major site upgrade. Please post all concerns and bugs to the Forum Usage Issues forum. We will be monitoring that forum. Thank you for all of your feedback.

    The TB Android app is working, you may need to uninstall/reinstall. The iPhone app is now updated and should work after you upgrade. TalkBass is responsive to any screen size, so we recommend using your mobile browser for full functionality.

    Please read the TalkBass 2014 FAQ for lots of great info on the new software.

440 Hz vs 432 Hz

Discussion in 'Recordings [BG]' started by AaronVonRock, Feb 10, 2014.

  1. AaronVonRock

    AaronVonRock

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2013
    Likes Received:
    2
  2. tom once dead

    tom once dead

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Likes Received:
    0
    I remember seeing this a few weeks ago. Pretty interesting stuff, I definitely preferred the A=432hz version.
    I've always naturally tuned a little flat, when I tune by ear. I guess this could be why.
  3. Jim Carr

    Jim Carr Dr. Jim Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2006
    Likes Received:
    3
    From the web pages http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphysics.com/heres-why-you-should-convert-your-music-to-432-hz/

    Nazis? Really? "Goebbels had but one big...." :spit:
    http://www.roelhollander.eu/en/tuning-frequency/goebbels-and-440/
  4. Jensby design

    Jensby design

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is all dependent on their being 86,400 seconds pre day, take that down to 84,829 by making each second 1.85185% longer and we will all be back on track.

    Octaves use to have 19 semitones not 12. Google "microtonal" and get ready to do some math, musicians are nerds. :(
  5. callofcthulhu

    callofcthulhu

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2012
    Likes Received:
    7
    I'm still going through the sources the article listed, looking for any traces of real science, but I will mention that the water memory experiment was exposed as a fraud at least five years ago, though that hasn't stopped it from circulating.

    I was really bummed to hear about it, too, the implications were amazing.
  6. tekdiver500ft

    tekdiver500ft Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Likes Received:
    36
    While I won't discuss the reasons touted in the article, I can state that up until the 20th century, most Western music was tuned to A432. Seems like I was told in school that it was changed because A432 was too depressing, and the "brighter" and "happier" A440 would be better for pop music.
  7. bongomania

    bongomania Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Likes Received:
    11
    Disclosures:
    owner, OVNIFX and OVNILabs
  8. AaronVonRock

    AaronVonRock

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2013
    Likes Received:
    2
  9. SolarMan

    SolarMan Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why would the prettier pattern in water sound better to a human brain?

    Let's see the Brain Scan patterns in a double blind randomized.

    Even if tuned to 432, how often will the slight bending of our notes throw off that beautiful universal harmony?

    It might be fun to think about this stuff - but I doubt that any of us are taking it even slightly seriously.

    Now; Back to my remote viewing of a bigfoot that is bending a spoon while being probed by aliens.
  10. Handyman

    Handyman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Likes Received:
    1
    What absolute and total pseudo scientific nonsense. I really hope no one is taking this seriously.
  11. Roscoe East

    Roscoe East

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    That argument makes the implicit assumption that we would want music to be "mathematically consistent with the patterns of the universe", that being numerically correlated with extant patterns is somehow a good thing.

    But if we don't and it isn't, then that argument is just a crock of poop.

    Heck, perhaps if all music was "mathematically consistent with the patterns of the universe" it would cease to distinguish itself as anything special at all! No thanks jeff.
  12. Pajama_Bottoms

    Pajama_Bottoms

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whoever wrote this has been tuning to 420 a little too often.
  13. SolarMan

    SolarMan Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0

    For the win! :)
  14. Jim Carr

    Jim Carr Dr. Jim Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2006
    Likes Received:
    3
    Maestro, the answer is here! But seriously, the idea that 440 is even all that widespread is a joke. Music has been around for at least 60,000 years, based on the ancient antler and bone flutes in the Museum of Natural History in Vienna, Austria.

    I wonder which "A" they used then? What about in 10,0000 BC Africa, or Old Kingdom Egypt? Did Pythagorus care? What was the "A" in the Guidonian Hand or in Josquin's Motets? Did the Shawnee use the same "A" as the Narragansett, and did 12th C. Mali singers tell the Tar players of Persia how to tune?

    Come on. There is no "A," there is only music as we see fit to make it the Art that it is. :rollno:
  15. Mykk

    Mykk

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    My band uses A432 in a A-E-A-D (Bass) and A-E-A-D-G-C-F (guitar)
  16. Beej

    Beej

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    Great article, very entertaining. I haven't laughed like that in a while...thanks... :)
  17. bassboysam

    bassboysam Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2001
    Likes Received:
    20
    What are you talking about? Everyone knows music started with The Beatles....
  18. GK Growl

    GK Growl

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is a kid somewhere right now thinking that music started with Justin Bieber.

Share This Page