1. Welcome to TalkBass 2014! If you're new here, we just went through a major site upgrade. Please post all concerns and bugs to the Forum Usage Issues forum. We will be monitoring that forum. Thank you for all of your feedback.

    The TB Android app is working, you may need to uninstall/reinstall. The iPhone app is now updated and should work after you upgrade. TalkBass is responsive to any screen size, so we recommend using your mobile browser for full functionality.

    Please read the TalkBass 2014 FAQ for lots of great info on the new software.

actual wattage

Discussion in 'Amps [BG]' started by Dugachug, Nov 11, 2012.

  1. Dugachug

    Dugachug

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was literally just about to buy this 200w amp or the 300w version, i browse around and GC tells me the amp is 35 watts.

    http://www.guitarcenter.com/Peavey-MAX-112-II-1X12-35W-Bass-Combo-Amp-107780942-i2469458.gc

    :eek: Would 200w be the maximum wattage the speaker can handle but the amp itself only puts out 35...? Kinda confused...and feel like Peavey is trying to screw people over because i would not pay 250 dollars for 35 watts, not even on a guitar amp. :scowl:
  2. B-string

    B-string Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Likes Received:
    23
  3. Primakurtz

    Primakurtz Registered Nihilist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Looks like a 35 watt combo amp.
    I have paid a LOT more for 30 watt tube guitar amps...
  4. Hactar

    Hactar

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
  5. LowEZ

    LowEZ Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Peavey named two amps the Max 112. A 35W combo and a 200W combo. Stupid.
  6. Dugachug

    Dugachug

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    it would seems GC has the wrong picture too :ninja: noobs
  7. 1958Bassman

    1958Bassman

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    What gave you the idea that these are 200W and 300W amps? If it was on the back, that's power consumption, not output. Sorry if you already knew this.
  8. Dugachug

    Dugachug

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    the 112 is 200w and the 115 says 300w but i have a feeling that is peak power not RMS, so i might just stay away from it.
  9. bobcruz

    bobcruz

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Likes Received:
    3
    I believe you're right. The specs and manual just say "200 watts" rather than "200 watts RMS" so it's likely those are peak wattage figures, and RMS would be roughly half that. Peavey used to be very conservative with wattage ratings and were known for producing "loud" watts for their ratings, but I guess those days are gone. :scowl:
  10. seamonkey

    seamonkey

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2004
    Likes Received:
    3
  11. 1958Bassman

    1958Bassman

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, I was asking where you saw the power rating. If, as I posted, it was on the back of the amp, that's not the amp's output.
  12. Dugachug

    Dugachug

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    actually i have never bought the amp so i cannot read the back lol i saw the power rating in the description of the amp online. :bag:
  13. usurperbass

    usurperbass

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    ebay seller bassrocker32,bassist/guitarist for Glory Bound & sessions
    I just purchased this amp from M.F. haven't heard it. It is 200 watts according to the sales rep from M.F. I was confused as well. Peavey should have named it differently. I should have it tomorrow. Has any one heard this amp?
  14. The_Janitor

    The_Janitor

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2012
    Likes Received:
    12
    They updated the amp and increased the power section. It was 35W, now 200W. Pretty decent sounding amp for what it is.
  15. usurperbass

    usurperbass

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    ebay seller bassrocker32,bassist/guitarist for Glory Bound & sessions
    From what I read about it sounds like a lot of bang for buck. My first bass amp was a Peavey TNT 130, that was back in 1988, great amp. I needed something with more power, easy to carry and something that I wouldn't have to worry about on the bar circuit.
  16. rapidfirerob

    rapidfirerob Fusion rules! Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    You think they might rename the new model.
  17. seamonkey

    seamonkey

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2004
    Likes Received:
    3
    You'd think!

    I wonder how many people think they're buying the new amp but getting left over stock of the old amp. This is so stupid.
  18. usurperbass

    usurperbass

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    ebay seller bassrocker32,bassist/guitarist for Glory Bound & sessions
    The 35 watt 112 sells for $199. The 200 watt sells for $249.
  19. usurperbass

    usurperbass

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    ebay seller bassrocker32,bassist/guitarist for Glory Bound & sessions
    Well, the Max 112 200 watt arrived yesterday afternoon and I found that I liked the tone and it seems to have versatility to its tone. Sunday will be the trial run with Glory Bound, we'll see how the built in DI works and Friday I'll test it for volume with the Distoniks. Keep you posted.
  20. ProdigalBassman

    ProdigalBassman

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Likes Received:
    1
    Peavey's web site shows both amps - WITH IDENTICAL NAMES :spit: The specs on the first Max 112 are 35 W RMS while the spec for the new Max 112-II just says "200W" so it's almost certainly a peak rating i.e the RMS rating would be half, or even less.

Share This Page