Genz Shuttle 9.0 vs Tecamp Puma 900

Discussion in 'Amps [BG]' started by CQC6, Mar 10, 2014.


  1. CQC6

    CQC6

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    31
    Hello All,

    I was wondering about the Puma 900.
    I currently play a Genz Shuttle 9.0 with a Bergantion AE410.
    It sounds good, but I'm digging the sound samples of the Puma.
    Just wondering if it's worth it to change up this rig?
    Also wondering how the AE410 would sound with the Puma 900?

    My bass is a Roscoe LG3005.

    Any opinions welcome.
    Thanks All!
     
  2. namuxtree

    namuxtree Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    829
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    I can't speak for the shuttle 9.0, but if it's anything like the Shuttle 3.0 or Shuttlemax 6.0, I would totally go for the Puma. To my ear, the shuttle series is a bit sterile and lifeless, kinda the epitome of the stereotype of class D amps. The Puma, however, is a different animal. It's very clear, but not overtly sterile and actually has a bit of nice warmth to it. I've been GAS free in the amp department for over a year and counting! Plus, you can't been German quality and engineering. ;)
     
  3. CQC6

    CQC6

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    31
    Thanks Namuxtree!
     
  4. bucephylus

    bucephylus

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2002
    Messages:
    3,636
    The 9.0 is different from the 3.0 and 6.0. HPF setting I believe are different. They weren't trying to protect small cabinets with the 9.0. JFYI

    IMO, sterile and lifeless is hardly how I would describe the 9.0. Not even close.

    I've posted this link too many times, but this is with 9.0 and no FOH. That's the 9.0 you are hearing. NOT sterile and lifeless. Sheesh.

     
  5. Register to disable this ad
  6. rapidfirerob

    rapidfirerob Fusion rules! Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,015
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    I don't think any Genz Benz amps are sterile. They don't color your sound, but it's not sterile and lifeless. No one would use them if they were.
     
  7. JxBass

    JxBass Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,727
    I owned a Shuttle 9.0 and it's a great amp. It replaced my Markbass LMII which I had used for quite some time. I also owned a Streamliner 900 and found I preferred the Shuttle and let the Streamliner go.

    I've owned Pumas for a couple of years after considering them for some time. They're my favorite amp to date - great tone, form factor, and versatility with the taste control.
     
  8. Jeff K

    Jeff K Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,223
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    I've never had the opportunity to play through a Puma, so I can't compare. I will say though, that I liked my Shuttle 9.0 so much that I snagged a second one as a backup. Love the tone, and would hardly call it "sterile-sounding". Oh and Bucephylus, your bass playing in that song you posted sounds great. Tasteful, and makes the song IMO.
     
  9. bucephylus

    bucephylus

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2002
    Messages:
    3,636
    Thanks Jeff; appreciate your kind comments.

    I wish that band was still around. I loved playing with that drummer.
     
  10. Artobass

    Artobass

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    92
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Genz Benz amps "Sterile and lifeless"? Not in my experience.
     
  11. LightGroove

    LightGroove

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,177
    Location:
    Happy Bottom, VA
    Well said...vocalist werent bad either ;)
     
  12. CQC6

    CQC6

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    31
    Thanks for the comments all.

    I like the Genz, but I think I want to try a Puma 900.
    I think I will keep whichever one I like least for a backup.
    Both seem to be great with more then enough power for any gig.

    Thanks again!
     

Share This Page