1. Welcome to TalkBass 2014! If you're new here, we just went through a major site upgrade. Please post all concerns and bugs to the Forum Usage Issues forum. We will be monitoring that forum. Thank you for all of your feedback.

    The TB Android app is working, you may need to uninstall/reinstall. The iPhone app is now updated and should work after you upgrade. TalkBass is responsive to any screen size, so we recommend using your mobile browser for full functionality.

    Please read the TalkBass 2014 FAQ for lots of great info on the new software.

History of Thunderbird pickups

Discussion in 'Pickups & Electronics [BG]' started by uOpt, Dec 4, 2012.

  1. uOpt

    uOpt Supporting Member

    Jul 21, 2008
    Likes Received:
    I couldn't gather this from the web. Polling forum wisdom.

    The Thunderbird pickup design changed a couple of times. Does anybody have details about when what changes happened:
    • The first construction IIRC was flat-lying coils with a bar magnet inside the coils (which means no polepieces), using Alnico. Just like the Firebird pickups
    • Then there are additional plates of magnetic material (steel?) that reshape the magnetic field
    • That seem to have change to various other humbucker constructions. This photo of a 1992 points to passively magnetic polepieces in the coils and magnet(s) on the bottom
    • Today's pickups are ceramics. When did that start? With the 1987 reissues?

    This is a great post, which I might want to bump later.

    Unfortunately it isn't clear on which variants of Thunderbird humbuckers had upright coils and which one had face-to-face coils. Anyone knows?

    As a mildly crazy question, how close would the Carvin soapbars (the ceramic humbucker version) come to current production Thunderbird sounds? I would be interested but since Carvin has decided not to make their soapbars compatible with regular Thunderbird style soapbars you'd be stuck with theirs.

Share This Page