Is it more profitable to sell a bass as whole or part out?

Discussion in 'Basses [BG]' started by rstellar13, Mar 19, 2014.


  1. rstellar13

    rstellar13 Sarcastic Panda

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2012
    Messages:
    332
    Location:
    Allentown, PA
    Im looking to sell a few of my bass, and I'm wondering if it is cheaper to part out or sell. Thoughts?
     
  2. JimmyM

    JimmyM Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Messages:
    79,592
    Location:
    Apopka, FL
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing: Ampeg Amps, EMG Pickups
    Depends on the bass. You have to factor in how desirable the parts are to buyers vs the whole bass and make a guesstimate. You also have to factor in the extra work and shipping costs involved in a partout. No clear answer on this one, I'm afraid.
     
  3. M0ses

    M0ses

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    3,219
    Location:
    Eastern Wisconsin
    In general I would guess you'd make more on the bass as a whole. It is certainly a lot more efficient.
     
  4. R&B

    R&B Don't want no treble. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,325
    Location:
    Southern California, SoCal
    Parting out seems to yield more cash. Personally, I find it distasteful. I play, and prefer, intact basses. Yet I do buy parts on occasion...so that must make me an enabler.
     
  5. Register to disable this ad
  6. Baird6869

    Baird6869 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    13,535
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Disclosures:
    Nobody is stupid enough to actually pay me to play their gear.
    Depends. I agree that parting out a great original vintage bass can be wrong, but I personally built a 1972 Jazz by buying parts and would part it out if I ever sold it. I wouldnt feel right about selling it as all original even though it could likely pass for it.
     

Share This Page