1. Welcome to TalkBass, the Premier Bass Player Community and Information Source. Register a 100% Free Account to post and unlock tons of features.

Jazz Bass Pickup shootout Tone not Chops

Discussion in 'Pickups & Electronics [BG]' started by jschwalls, Feb 25, 2014.


  1. jschwalls

    jschwalls

    Sep 4, 2007
    Savannah GA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD2wyAuhOWc

    curious what you guys think...

    Which do you prefer ...

    I have 3 sets here David Allen Jazz...Dimarzio Ultra-Jazz...Duncan Antiquity II

    not in that order.. or maybe they are.... I will reveal the mystery in a few days...

    Be sure to set video option to 1080p ..

    Thanks guys...

    #1 Dimarzio Ultra-Jazz
    #2 Duncan Antiquity II
    #3 D.Allen Jazz
     
  2. DannyBob

    DannyBob

    Aug 28, 2013
    UK
    Number 1 by far has the best overall tone. I found 2 lacking any real 'oomph' on the low E string, gradually gaining in 'oomph' until the G. Number 3 I thought was too much 'oomph' across all strings. So, my order of preference is the order they were played; 1, 2 and then 3.
     
    madjazzbass likes this.
  3. TalkBass Friendly Advertisement


    to hide this ad and more.
  4. FrenchBassQC

    FrenchBassQC Supporting Member

    Jul 13, 2011
    Gatineau QC CA
  5. Why do you hammer with the 3rd one? Or keep changing the tempo so much? Hard to do a comparison with these inconsistensies. Also, try recording direct next time. I personally don't trust camera microphones.
     
  6. jschwalls

    jschwalls

    Sep 4, 2007
    Savannah GA
    sorry it sucks so bad...

    I have ton of excuses..
     
  7. Exploiter8

    Exploiter8 And Now for Something Completely Different Supporting Member

    Jan 18, 2010
    Midwest
    Disclosures:
    Commercial FREE!
    Number 3 for me. It had the most consistent, expected sound across all styles. I'm sure it'll boil down to the type of music you play.

    I could be happy with Number 2 as an all around sound. Number 1 didn't do anything for me, too honkey (as in goose, not white).

    X8
     
    madjazzbass likes this.
  8. BrBss

    BrBss

    Jul 9, 2010
    NM
    1 parallel, 3 series.
     
  9. Pokerdweebz

    Pokerdweebz

    Oct 26, 2012
    Lititz, PA
    2, 1, 3 (Slap 1, 3, 2, but I'm not a slap player)

    2: I preferred the warmth of these pickups
    1: Very nice attack with a nice punch
    3: Too open and "uncontrolled" sounding
     
  10. Pokerdweebz

    Pokerdweebz

    Oct 26, 2012
    Lititz, PA
    Funny, that's what I thought about number 3. To each his own :bassist:
     
  11. P-oddz

    P-oddz Supporting Member

    Apr 7, 2009
    Milwaukee, WI
    2, 1, 3

    #2: has a nice warmth and midrange punch (as mentioned above)
    #1: fairly even response but lacking any real character and punch I like about #2
    #3: too bright and scooped sounding for my taste
     
  12. CPplaysBASS

    CPplaysBASS Supporting Member

    Mar 17, 2007
    Ontario
    I'm choosing #2 overall. I'm hearing a little more top end than #1 and think it would punch through a full band mix a bit better. # 3 sounds too nasally to me on most of the examples, although I liked it most for slap style.
     
  13. Syxz_ML

    Syxz_ML

    Apr 10, 2012
    Los Angeles
    I chose 1 over 2. But 3 had its own unique range I could see myself using for other applications then I would use number 1.

    So 1, 3, and then 2
     
  14. Hopkins

    Hopkins Supporting Member

    Nov 17, 2010
    Houston Tx
    You recorded #1 and #2 similarly and increased the attack on #3, So since I don't have a reliable basis for comparison for #3 against #1 and #2. So my choice between #1 and #2, I would choose #1
     
    madjazzbass likes this.
  15. BlueTalon

    BlueTalon Happy Cynic Supporting Member

    Mar 20, 2011
    Spokane, Washington
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing Artist: Turnstyle Switch
    There were certain applications I liked #3 the best, but only a few. For example, if I had to play slap using only the bridge pickup, I would use #3. For many of your comparisons, I liked #1 and #2 equally well. On several, I liked #1 the best, but overall, #2 was the clear winner for me. So...

    #2
    #1
    #3
     
  16. Isotonic

    Isotonic

    Oct 19, 2011
    Round Rock TX
  17. Stick_Player

    Stick_Player Banned

    Nov 13, 2009
    Somewhere on the Alaska Panhandle (Juneau)
    Disclosures:
    Endorser: Plants vs. Zombies Pea Shooters
    Your camera's audio/mic compression creates unreliable examples.
     
  18. chuck norriss

    chuck norriss Banned

    Jan 20, 2011
    1 series
    youtube may not be so clear but i'm listening on sony mdr7506--good earmuffs
     
  19. jschwalls

    jschwalls

    Sep 4, 2007
    Savannah GA
    Youtube compressed the CRAP out of it.. bummer I spent a lot of time with the audio...

    oh well.. just a fun example for guys to hear..
     
  20. Syxz_ML

    Syxz_ML

    Apr 10, 2012
    Los Angeles
    YouTube compressed audio or not, miced amp recording or direct, regardless still a helpful shootout
     
  21. ctmullins

    ctmullins Registered Panther Supporting Member

    Apr 18, 2008
    MS Gulf Coast
    Yes, intriguing. I liked #1 the best, then #3, then #2. But I'm really curious about which one was the DiMarzio.... :)
     



Share This Page