1. Welcome to TalkBass 2014! If you're new here, we just went through a major site upgrade. Please post all concerns and bugs to the Forum Usage Issues forum. We will be monitoring that forum. Thank you for all of your feedback.

    The TalkBass iphone/android app is NOT WORKING currently. We're working on it. Tapatalk IS working, so if you need to use an app, use Tapatalk. Try using your browser though - TalkBass is now 100% responsive to your phone/tablet screen size ;)

    Please read the TalkBass 2014 FAQ for lots of great info on the new software.

Jazz Bass Pickup shootout Tone not Chops

Discussion in 'Pickups & Electronics [BG]' started by jschwalls, Feb 25, 2014.

  1. jschwalls

    jschwalls Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Likes Received:
    1
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD2wyAuhOWc

    curious what you guys think...

    Which do you prefer ...

    I have 3 sets here David Allen Jazz...Dimarzio Ultra-Jazz...Duncan Antiquity II

    not in that order.. or maybe they are.... I will reveal the mystery in a few days...

    Be sure to set video option to 1080p ..

    Thanks guys...

    #1 Dimarzio Ultra-Jazz
    #2 Duncan Antiquity II
    #3 D.Allen Jazz
  2. DannyBob

    DannyBob

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Number 1 by far has the best overall tone. I found 2 lacking any real 'oomph' on the low E string, gradually gaining in 'oomph' until the G. Number 3 I thought was too much 'oomph' across all strings. So, my order of preference is the order they were played; 1, 2 and then 3.
  3. FrenchBassQC

    FrenchBassQC Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    1, 3 and 2 for me.
  4. Salamenster

    Salamenster

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why do you hammer with the 3rd one? Or keep changing the tempo so much? Hard to do a comparison with these inconsistensies. Also, try recording direct next time. I personally don't trust camera microphones.
  5. jschwalls

    jschwalls Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Likes Received:
    1
    sorry it sucks so bad...

    I have ton of excuses..
  6. Exploiter8

    Exploiter8 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    Number 3 for me. It had the most consistent, expected sound across all styles. I'm sure it'll boil down to the type of music you play.

    I could be happy with Number 2 as an all around sound. Number 1 didn't do anything for me, too honkey (as in goose, not white).

    X8
  7. brendanbassist

    brendanbassist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    1 parallel, 3 series.
  8. Pokerdweebz

    Pokerdweebz Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    2, 1, 3 (Slap 1, 3, 2, but I'm not a slap player)

    2: I preferred the warmth of these pickups
    1: Very nice attack with a nice punch
    3: Too open and "uncontrolled" sounding
  9. Pokerdweebz

    Pokerdweebz Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    Funny, that's what I thought about number 3. To each his own :bassist:
  10. P-oddz

    P-oddz Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Likes Received:
    1
    2, 1, 3

    #2: has a nice warmth and midrange punch (as mentioned above)
    #1: fairly even response but lacking any real character and punch I like about #2
    #3: too bright and scooped sounding for my taste
  11. CPplaysBASS

    CPplaysBASS Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm choosing #2 overall. I'm hearing a little more top end than #1 and think it would punch through a full band mix a bit better. # 3 sounds too nasally to me on most of the examples, although I liked it most for slap style.
  12. Syxz_ML

    Syxz_ML

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    I chose 1 over 2. But 3 had its own unique range I could see myself using for other applications then I would use number 1.

    So 1, 3, and then 2
  13. Hopkins

    Hopkins Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Likes Received:
    7
    You recorded #1 and #2 similarly and increased the attack on #3, So since I don't have a reliable basis for comparison for #3 against #1 and #2. So my choice between #1 and #2, I would choose #1
  14. BlueTalon

    BlueTalon Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing Artist: Turnstyle Switch
    There were certain applications I liked #3 the best, but only a few. For example, if I had to play slap using only the bridge pickup, I would use #3. For many of your comparisons, I liked #1 and #2 equally well. On several, I liked #1 the best, but overall, #2 was the clear winner for me. So...

    #2
    #1
    #3
  15. Isotonic

    Isotonic Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    2 then 1 then 3
  16. Stick_Player

    Stick_Player

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Likes Received:
    2
    Your camera's audio/mic compression creates unreliable examples.
  17. chuck norriss

    chuck norriss Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2011
    Likes Received:
    2
    1 series
    youtube may not be so clear but i'm listening on sony mdr7506--good earmuffs
  18. jschwalls

    jschwalls Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Likes Received:
    1
    Youtube compressed the CRAP out of it.. bummer I spent a lot of time with the audio...

    oh well.. just a fun example for guys to hear..
  19. Syxz_ML

    Syxz_ML

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    YouTube compressed audio or not, miced amp recording or direct, regardless still a helpful shootout
  20. ctmullins

    ctmullins Registered 8er Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, intriguing. I liked #1 the best, then #3, then #2. But I'm really curious about which one was the DiMarzio.... :)

Share This Page