Markbass CMD 102P 2x10 Combo vs Eden WT-400 with a 210XST

Discussion in 'Amps [BG]' started by 2string1, Jan 16, 2014.


  1. 2string1

    2string1 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Are they any comparisons? Will the Eden blow away the MB combo?
  2. chuck norriss

    chuck norriss Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2011
  3. Thumper

    Thumper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2000
    Location:
    Layton, UT
    Agree, but the Markbass is lighter which now matters to my deteriorating L5 and T3
  4. 2string1

    2string1 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    How much sound are you sacrificing for lighter weight?
  5. Register to disable this ad
  6. Thumper

    Thumper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2000
    Location:
    Layton, UT
    For a 4 string, the cmd102 is great. For a 5, not so much (which is why I use an extension). About a 25 lb difference though. When I was young and healthy I loved my WT300 and 210/115 XLT rig.
  7. Freddels

    Freddels Musical Anarchist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Sutton, MA
    I was going to get the Jeff Berlin combo but after comparing it to the CMD102P with a low B, the 210 combo handled the low B much better.

    I haven't played the Eden's but a friend of mine used to gig a pair of those. He blew the speakers and Eden wasn't much help with trying to get them fixed. He ditched them after being an Eden user for years.

Share This Page