1. Welcome to TalkBass 2014! If you're new here, we just went through a major site upgrade. Please post all concerns and bugs to the Forum Usage Issues forum. We will be monitoring that forum. Thank you for all of your feedback.

    The TalkBass iphone/android app is NOT WORKING currently. We're working on it. Tapatalk IS working, so if you need to use an app, use Tapatalk. Try using your browser though - TalkBass is now 100% responsive to your phone/tablet screen size ;)

    Please read the TalkBass 2014 FAQ for lots of great info on the new software.

Modulus Necks: VJ4 vs. Quantum 5

Discussion in 'Basses [BG]' started by Slowburn, Jan 17, 2013.

  1. Slowburn

    Slowburn

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can anyone share some insight on the differences in feel and action from the vj4 vs. the quantum 5? weird question i know, but i have my reasoning.

    Thanks so much in advance!!!
  2. Slowburn

    Slowburn

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    basically, is there a big difference? Modulus experts?
  3. mikezimmerman

    mikezimmerman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2001
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, one is a 34" 4-strings neck with 21 frets and 19mm spacing, and one is a 35" scale 5-string neck with 24 frets and 17mm spacing. What aspect of the necks is it that you want compared, exactly?
  4. bassgod0dmw

    bassgod0dmw Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Likes Received:
    6
    ^^^+1

    In essence, there is a huge difference between them.
  5. elgecko

    elgecko

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Likes Received:
    2
    The VJ neck is more traditionally shaped (i.e. symmetrical) in cross section. The Q5 neck is asymetrical (like an airplane wing).

    EDIT: Disclaimer - This is for pre-truss necks. I haven't played the newer Q5s.
  6. edwinhurwitz

    edwinhurwitz Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing Artist: DR Strings, SMS, D-TAR
    The Quantum necks also depends on the year. My 1990 Q6 neck is very flat on the back and makes the newer ones feel like baseball bats.
  7. mikezimmerman

    mikezimmerman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2001
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've had 2 Q5s--one non-trussrod from the 90's, one with truss rod from 2009--and neither had an asymmetrical neck. What year is/was yours from?
  8. elgecko

    elgecko

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Likes Received:
    2
    1993. It's thicker along the B-string side than along the G-side. ..and it's more pronounced at the nut than at the 24th fret...or is it the other way around?
  9. Quackhead

    Quackhead

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    My Q5 did not have an asymmetrical neck either.
  10. elgecko

    elgecko

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Likes Received:
    2
    Odd...what year?
  11. bassgod0dmw

    bassgod0dmw Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Likes Received:
    6
    My Q5 is a 2004 and isn't asymmetrical either. It is fairly thin front to back too, nothing like a baseball bat. It might be the thinnest neck I've got, and that include a Lakland and a Sadowsky.
  12. Slowburn

    Slowburn

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bump for more discussion on quantum necks, that's the info I'm after! Thanks !
  13. elgecko

    elgecko

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Likes Received:
    2
    Regarding symmetry, I tried to measure the thickness on my Q5 with a pair of cheap, plastic calipers but couldn't come up with any meaningful measurements. With my hand though, I feel the neck tapering slightly towards the G side, most noticeably between the nut and the fourth fret.

    As mentioned above, they're very thin front-to-back and relatively flat. Really great feeling necks. Legend has it that Michael Tobias carved the necks that the original molds were made from.
  14. Roscoe East

    Roscoe East

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd heard that too, but thought it only pertained to the through-body TBX models circa 1993. Only played one of those Quantum-5 TBX basses once and to be honest didn't notice whether or not the neck was asymmetrical.

    fwiw my 1988 Quantum 6-string neck seems symmetrical.
  15. Hidesert

    Hidesert Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    My Q5 has a moderately wide-thin neck profile, definitely symmetrical. I think that scale and string spacing are the defining parameters between the two models, and thin /early/no truss rod vs. chunky/newer/truss rod defines the different neck profiles within a particular model.
    I have owned a Modulus for about a week, so that makes me an expert, right?
  16. Quackhead

    Quackhead

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not sure. I sold it a few years back. It was probably a late 90's model though. And I am absolutely positive that it wasn't asymmetrical.

  17. Slowburn

    Slowburn

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    thanks for the discussion. Love learning through your experiences. bump for more!

Share This Page