1. Welcome to TalkBass 2014! If you're new here, we just went through a major site upgrade. Please post all concerns and bugs to the Forum Usage Issues forum. We will be monitoring that forum. Thank you for all of your feedback.

    The TalkBass iphone/android app is NOT WORKING currently. We're working on it. Tapatalk IS working, so if you need to use an app, use Tapatalk. Try using your browser though - TalkBass is now 100% responsive to your phone/tablet screen size ;)

    Please read the TalkBass 2014 FAQ for lots of great info on the new software.

More High End Under Load

Discussion in 'Amps [BG]' started by Remus_Redbone, Feb 26, 2014.

  1. Remus_Redbone

    Remus_Redbone

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    I purchased a GK MB500 head a few months ago to replace the amp on top of my old Ampeg B15T Portaflex cabinet.

    Something I have noticed; when driving the single Eminence Legend CB 158-8 ohm speaker I now have in the Portaflex cabinet, the amp sounds fine, but has less high end than when I have it driving the Eminence and any other 8 ohm speaker. I know the amp is producing more power into the 4 ohm load, but I haven't owned an amp that changes its "EQ" when driving a lower resistance load.

    As an experiment, I got a longer speaker cable and faced the extension speaker away from me and about 10' away. I sat directly in front of the Portaflex, and played the amp with the extension speaker connected, then with it disconnected. The result; significantly more high end out of the Eminence in the cabinet when the amp is driving the 4 ohm load.

    The extension speaker is an old JBL E140 - 8 ohm in a homemade cabinet with no tweeter. Nothing special, but good reinforcement when I need the extra kick for a big room or outdoors. I even faced it into the floor one time to make sure it wasn't the source of the additional highs. Same results; the Eminence in the main cabinet sounds much brighter when the amp is loaded at 4 ohms.

    Are my ears playing tricks on me, or is it not so unusual for an amp to have a different frequency response when under a different load?
  2. T-Bird

    T-Bird

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi.

    When combined without a crossover, the two different cabs are slightly out of phase with eachother on certain frequencies.
    The lows are affected (attenuated) more than the highs.

    Rather common phenomenon when mix-matching cabs.

    Regards
    Sam
  3. Remus_Redbone

    Remus_Redbone

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think I pretty well eliminated any out of phase issues by laying the extension cabinet face down several feet behind the Portaflex cabinet, and playing / testing with my face (ears) directly in front of the Eminence speaker in the Portaflex cabinet.

    In my original post;
  4. T-Bird

    T-Bird

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi.

    Actually, You IME did not.
    Depending on the space the test is done and the dissimilarities between the two speakers, there's no telling how high the unpredictable frequency reproduction extends.

    The lows, being of course omnidirectional in nature, are affected the most. The speaker orientation then obviously has very little or no effect on that.

    Only by the aid of a steep cross over(s) You can partly eliminate that unpredictability.

    If You do the test with two alike cabs/speakers, and still get the same results, I'd look at the amp as the cause of that rather weird phenomenon.

    OTOH, by feeding the existing mis-match rig from a signal generator and using something as simple as the dB meter on Your phone, you can gather some empirical data on the affected frequencies.

    Regards
    Sam
  5. teemuk

    teemuk

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Class-D amp? Their output LC filters are usually tuned for a certain load and response to higher or lower loads is different.
  6. nashvillebill

    nashvillebill

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2002
    Likes Received:
    0
    The polarity on early JBL speakers, by the way, is opposite of conventional speaker polarity. For conventional speakers, the cone moves outward when a positive signal is applied to the + terminal on the speaker. For these JBL, the cone moves inward. (This is in JBL Technical Notes, Volume 1 Number 12B.)

    Try reversing the polarity on the JBL.
  7. Remus_Redbone

    Remus_Redbone

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ya, well aware of the JBL polarity issue; been using the same type speaker for over 20 years. I did the 9v batt test to insure have it in phase with the Eminence in the main cab and all other cabs I own.

    That would have probably resulted in a major thinning of the overall sound. I'm not experiencing that at all.

    When I connect ANY other 8 ohm speaker I have, I'm hearing a significant increase in the brightness / treble out of the Eminennce speaker in the Portaflex cab on which the amp sits.
    This is like hitting a bright switch when I plug in the second speaker; any other speaker I own.

    A previousl post by teemuk seems to suggest this is a characteristic of a class D amp, which the MB500 certainly is at 7" x 11" x 2" and 4 lbs.
  8. Mr. Foxen

    Mr. Foxen

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    Amp tinkerer at Ampstack
    Might be your extra power handling and sensitivity is meaning less distortion, which means less high harmonics.
  9. Linnin

    Linnin

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    Grab a matching pair of GK 112 Neo cabs and run the same experiment.
  10. Remus_Redbone

    Remus_Redbone

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm doubting my wife would buy the rationalization for "needing" two more speaker cabinets considering I've got 8 sitting around here already.
    My line; "I've got to have these two matching speakers to figure out why my new amp does this unusual treble boost when I plug in both at the same time".

    Might work....
  11. Passinwind

    Passinwind Charlie Escher Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Likes Received:
    4
    With a purely resistive load Class D amps typically make less high treble with lower impedance loads. Here's an article that illustrates that. Rod Elliot also mentions that speakers are not ideal loads, and how that can affect things. Maybe Teemuk can expound on what he thinks might be going on. I have a theory or two that might explain it, but would rather not go off half-cocked. ;)
  12. AstroSonic

    AstroSonic Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Likes Received:
    0
    The answer to this may be that the parallel loads are not equal. The voice coil inductance causes a marked impedance rise (impedance rises with frequency) starting at a few hundred Hz. For drivers with markedly different voice coil inductance, the impedance two different 8 ohm drivers would diverge rapidly as frequency increased. The load seen be the amplifier at higher frequencies would be markedly unequal. The driver with the lower voice coil inductance would receive more power from the high mids upward. The voice coil inductance of the CB158 is specified as 0.33 mH, while that of the JBL E140 is 1.1 mH. The impedance of the JBL would be higher than the CB158 at high frequencies. The CB158 would receive more power at higher frequencies as a result.

    This phenomenon could largely explains why non-identical speaker cabs often blend unpredictably. The oft sighted phase difference may be a contributor, but experience with many phase coherent and non-coherent speaker systems suggests that the ear largely ignores phase differences (at least up to a point).

    The suggestion to test using two identical speakers would likely help settle this.
  13. Downunderwonder

    Downunderwonder

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Likes Received:
    0
    Solution is simple. You NEED another identical JBL cab ;)
  14. dmusic148

    dmusic148

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think AstroSonic might have nailed it. Sounds like a reasonable explanation.

Share This Page