So, I generally hate the Fender tone stack...

Discussion in 'Amps [BG]' started by LiquidMidnight, Jul 15, 2013.


  1. LiquidMidnight

    LiquidMidnight Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2000
    ...yet many of my favorite amps seem to have it, so I just deal. :meh: Anyone else in the same boat?
  2. Deedubs

    Deedubs

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    My new to me mesa buster head has the fender tone stack. Glad I read the manual and didn't try and figure it out on my own. Here's a link for anyone that would like a good explanation of how to use a fender type tone stack http://www.mesaboogie.com/manuals/Buster Bass 200.pdf
  3. hdracer

    hdracer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Location:
    Elk River, MN.
    I love it.
  4. pfschim

    pfschim Just a Skeleton with a Jazz bass

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    nope, I love the Fender tone stack, never had a problem getting the tone I need. Also pretty happy with Baxandall too.

    good luck
  5. Register to disable this ad
  6. Passinwind

    Passinwind Charlie Escher Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Media:
    17
    Albums:
    1
    Location:
    Columbia River Gorge, WA.
    Same here, but for me onboard EQ is my go-to regardless of what scheme the amp uses.
  7. JimmyM

    JimmyM Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Location:
    Apopka, FL
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing: Ampeg Amps, EMG Pickups
    I've been able to get some good sounds with amps using Fender tone stacks, but I still dig something that will let you get more mid-forward and cut more treble if you need it. Especially the cutting treble part.
  8. David A. Davis

    David A. Davis Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2008
    Location:
    Christiansburg, VA
    What exactly makes them your favorites if you don't like the tone stacks?
  9. jnewmark

    jnewmark Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Location:
    Stax 1966
    Disclosures:
    Play guitar.
    Hmmm. I always thought the Fender tone stack was , turn the Mid all the way to the right to eliminate the mids, thus the " 2-10-2 " setting. Unless I'm reading the Mesa manual wrong, it says to turn the Mid all the way " down " , which I'm assuming is all the way to the left ( pictured in the manual at about 9 o'clock ) ? What am I missing here ?
  10. nukes_da_bass

    nukes_da_bass Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Location:
    west suburban boston
    Fender style mid control is cut only. So '10' is flat.
    There is no mid-boost on a fender tone stack.
  11. packhowitzer

    packhowitzer 155mm of pure destruction Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Location:
    Atlanta
    +1 good question.
  12. bgavin

    bgavin Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2001
    Location:
    Orangevale, CA 95662
    Yes.
    I dumped my F1X for the same reason.
  13. two fingers

    two fingers Loud Mouth Know It All Blowhard Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    My first thought as well.
  14. wideload

    wideload

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    I thought that more control would be best,, but I love the sound of my F-1X enough that I don't care. My bass has enough mid control that it's not needed at the preamp, I guess.
  15. Lonnybass

    Lonnybass

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2000
    Location:
    Minneapolis by way of Chicago
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing Artist: Pedulla Basses
    A Fender tone stack like the Alembic F-1x benefits greatly from the addition of a parametric EQ so you can dial in the precise spot and amount of midrange boost to supplement what you've got out of the tube. For me it's a slight bump at 500 Hz and it's perfection.

    Lonnybass
  16. LiquidMidnight

    LiquidMidnight Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2000
    An amp is more than just its tone stack. I often like everything else about them. I love my 400+, but I do tone shaping with its graphic EQ. If I get into a new room and need to cut lows or add highs, I like just cutting lows or adding highs rather than dealing with an interactive EQ, especially since the 400+ already has a rather in-depth EQ section with the Fender tone stack, the graphic EQ, and a number of push-pull pots.
  17. Mr. Foxen

    Mr. Foxen

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Location:
    Bristol, UK
    Disclosures:
    Amp tinkerer at Ampstack
    My favourite amp has a fender type stack with a fixed mid, and a separate active boost only mid.
  18. Sartori

    Sartori

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area, CA
    That sounds quite versatile.
  19. will33

    will33

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Location:
    austin,tx
    Disclosures:
    Use of this field for any other purpose is prohibited
    Never had a problem getting a good sound out a Fender stack as far as I know...I rather like them. You simply turn knobs until it sounds good...just like any other amp. Just means you might have to stray a ways from center with the knobs:eek: that's all.
  20. Fuzzbass

    Fuzzbass Gnarsty bass tones Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Location:
    Maryland, between Bawlmer & DC
    I agree with you. The Fender/Baxandall circuit sounds great. The Alembic F2B was my go-to preamp for a long time. However it's counter-intuitive, and I often missed a mid-boost. So, I sometimes used the F2B with another preamp or eq.

    The lack of treble-cut was never a problem for me; for that I'd use the passive tone control on the bass. But that's not the same as using active EQ to cut treble, so I understand Jimmy's need.
  21. bgavin

    bgavin Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2001
    Location:
    Orangevale, CA 95662
    +1 to that, which is why my F1-X was replaced by an Interstellar Overdrive.

    The IOD has everything I desire, except for its anemic output.
    The foot switch controllable grind and foot pedal blend make the IOD very useful.
    The low gain structure completely sucks when used with passive basses having low output pickups.

Share This Page