1. Welcome to TalkBass, the Premier Bass Player Community and Information Source. We've been uniting the Low End Since 1998!

    We're glad you've found us. Register a 100% Free Account to post and unlock tons of features.

SR5 sounds different than 4 string Rays?

Discussion in 'Basses [BG]' started by Tupac, Dec 8, 2012.


  1. Tupac

    Tupac

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    I side by side'd them at the store, and it sounded like the SR5 had a different tone. A better tone IMO. It had less of the classic Ray twang, but more of a low, distorted thump. Kind of like Tim Commorford's Evil Empire tone for comparison. Delicious.
     
  2. dedpool1052

    dedpool1052

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    the pickup on both is listed as being alnico. the SR5 also has the series/single/parallel switch. perhaps you were playing it in series?
    when i still had my SR5, series was my favorite setting. super chunky tone.
     
  3. NYCbassist

    NYCbassist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Location:
    Mount Airy, North Carolina
    I was always told that SR5's were a completely different bass than SR4's. Not just an SR4 with a 5th string but built from the ground up so to speak.
     
  4. joebar

    joebar

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    from what i was told, the SR5 is modeled after the sterling; it is different from the SR4
     
  5. Register to disable this ad
  6. mccartneyman

    mccartneyman

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Disclosures:
    Managing Editor, Bass Guitars Editor, MusicGearReview.com
    Don't like the SR5 for precisely this reason.
     
  7. DeliriumTremens

    DeliriumTremens

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    for a number of years the 5er used a ceramic magnet in the pickup
     
  8. zortation

    zortation Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2011
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    You have it backwards, but otherwise correct, I think?
     
  9. Dave W

    Dave W Previously bassgod0dmw Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Location:
    White Plains
    Yep. They switched back to Alnico in 2008 I believe.
     
  10. georgestrings

    georgestrings Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Depends - the OP didn't specify... For example, the regular SR4 and SR5, or the Classic series??? Personally, I prefer the ceramic pups on the Classic series and Sterlings over the alnico pups on the current SR4 and SR5...


    - georgestrings
     
  11. Freddels

    Freddels Musical Anarchist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Sutton, MA
    According to the EBMM site, the classic Stingrays have Alnico pickups.

    The ceramics are on the Sterlings (4's & 5's). So, if you want the pre 2008 SR5 tone, get a Sterling 5.
     
  12. jmattbassplaya

    jmattbassplaya

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Location:
    Just south of Atlanta!
    I had a SR5 for some time and I never cared for the tone. It in no way sounded like an SR4. That said, apparently I was wrong and Funky Monks was recorded with a Ray5, and that's one of my favorite tones. Go figure. Mine never captured that tone, either :meh:
     
  13. Freddels

    Freddels Musical Anarchist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Sutton, MA
    What year was it made? Was it ceramic or alnico pickups?
     
  14. jmattbassplaya

    jmattbassplaya

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Location:
    Just south of Atlanta!
    I got it new in (I think) '09 which probably meant it had the same magnets as a regular SR4. Weird, huh?
     
  15. Freddels

    Freddels Musical Anarchist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Sutton, MA
    Yeah, but then again it's wood and that does affect the tone. I like the series/singlecoil/parallel switch but haven't heard it with the alnico pickups yet.

    I'd like to be able to A/B them next to each other.
     
  16. Tupac

    Tupac

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Flea had a nice tone with his SR5 on Blood Sugar. Check it. The bass I picked up sounded just like this, so it must have been pre 2008. Blood Sugar was in 91, so that means ceramic pickups. Interesting. So the SR5s now sound the same as the 4 string Stingrays? I liked the old 5 string sound much more than Stingrays.
     
  17. Epitaph04

    Epitaph04 EBMM Nut Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Location:
    Santa Barbara, CA
    No SR5 has sounded as good as any of the SR5s I've tried. Really wish the B was stronger on the Ray5's ive tried/owned.

    Either way, the tone on the SR4 IMO absolutely kills. Maybe I should get one and convert it to BEAD.....
     
  18. Smallmouth_Bass

    Smallmouth_Bass Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Location:
    Canada
    I thought Blood Sugar Sex Magic was recorded on a Wal.
     
  19. Freddels

    Freddels Musical Anarchist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Sutton, MA
    Not so fast! If you're sure it was an SR5 and not a 4 stringer, then it could have been alnico. AFAIK, the SR5 was introduced in '87 with alnico pickups. Sometime in '91, they changed to ceramic. Then in 2008, back to alnico. So, Flea's SR5 could have been alnico. Also, some of the early SR5's didn't have the phantom coil so there was hum when in single coil mode.
     
  20. bigsnack

    bigsnack Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Same here! Back in the day I bought an SR5 for the same reasons, and was just as surprised as you. Brendan O'Brien has been responsible for all of my favorite recorded bass tones, and he always blends DI and amp tones together. To my ear, the majority of the tone on BSSM is the amp and the way it was recorded.
     
  21. Clef_de_fa

    Clef_de_fa

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Location:
    Canada
    Let's not forget that in the case of BSSM ... it has a lot of studio magic thrown in it



    As for the bass ... well to me it is kind of obvious ... the shape of the SR5 and SR4 is different also it didn,t have the same magnet for a very long time. So I think those two things is why the sound is different.
     

Share This Page