1. Welcome to TalkBass 2014! If you're new here, we just went through a major site upgrade. Please post all concerns and bugs to the Forum Usage Issues forum. We will be monitoring that forum. Thank you for all of your feedback.

    The TB Android app is working, you may need to uninstall/reinstall. The iPhone app is still pending approval by Apple. If you haven't yet, try using your mobile browser - TalkBass is responsive to any screen size.

    Please read the TalkBass 2014 FAQ for lots of great info on the new software.

SX bass headstock

Discussion in 'Basses [BG]' started by foetus66, Feb 7, 2013.

  1. foetus66

    foetus66

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, you guys are passionate about the headstocks on these cheap basses. There are several threads about them. So, I have a question about 'em that doesn't seem to have been covered.

    I don't mind the shape of the new headstocks, kinda reminds me of old Peavey T series or something, which I like. But from what I can tell in pictures of them, they look HUGE. Like, half the size of the body. (ok, maybe a third).. Looks like you could use it for a barbell.

    Is this just the pictures playing tricks on me? I'm interested in possibly picking one up. Specifically, a shortscale one, which might add to the headstock's large appearance, but pics of other shortscale basses don't seem to strike me as having this problem.
  2. BlueTalon

    BlueTalon Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing Artist: Turnstyle Switch
    Mine is roughly the same size as a Fender Jazz headstock.
  3. foetus66

    foetus66

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    Another possibility just struck me -- is the body just on the small side?
  4. BlueTalon

    BlueTalon Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing Artist: Turnstyle Switch
    THAT is quite possible. They make a bass the call 3/4 size (as if it's a cello or something). The bodies on those are cartoony small. And the neck is small, and the headstock is normal size.

    [​IMG]
  5. Rip Topaz

    Rip Topaz

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Likes Received:
    1
    Disclosures:
    Beta tester for Positive Grid
    +1. My son has a 3/4 size SX, and the headstock looks pretty freakish on that size. The body is tiny but the headstock is full sized. On the full sized ones it looks fine.
  6. dabbler

    dabbler

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    If anything is large on the SXes, it's the bodies. Ibanez, Squier and SX for comparison:

    [​IMG]
  7. foetus66

    foetus66

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for clearing that up. I wonder if that is the case with ALL of their 30" scale basses.
  8. xantometapon

    xantometapon

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have a short scale SX Ursa 4 model (kind of Jaguar shape)
    I think the headstock is ok in it´s size. Do not think is that big at all.

    At least in my bass, it looks fine in relation to the body.

    What I don´t like at all is the shape of it.
    Right now it is been cutted by a luthier to make it a little more "fender" like.

    Besides that, I really like the bass.
    Thinking about buying another shorty but with a P/J configuration.
  9. Rip Topaz

    Rip Topaz

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Likes Received:
    1
    Disclosures:
    Beta tester for Positive Grid
    The thing I wonder about with everyone cutting their headstocks, is it putting the bass more at risk of dead spots by reducing the mass of the headstock?

    It just seems to me that it may be better to just leave it be.
  10. xantometapon

    xantometapon

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just to add some more info, the body of my Ursa 4 is almost, almost the sime size as the body of my Warwick LX4.
  11. xantometapon

    xantometapon

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow!
    Didn´t think about that.

    Well, it is already being made so let´s hope nothing bad happens...
  12. mcnach

    mcnach

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    Adding or reducing mass at The headstock does note induce or cure dead spots, on itself.
    The reason people sometimes add mass to cure deadspots is that it will shift the frequency at which you will have a deadspot. It is unpredictable, but it can often move it to a frequency that won't bother you, away from the original range...
  13. bassbenj

    bassbenj

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Just one or two data points. I always do the "dixiecup" mod on my SX Ursa headstocks and have never seen it cause any dead spots. On the contrary, I have an Ursa 5er that indeed has a mild deadspot on the fretted neck. And I can say that the headstock mod (unfortunately) made no difference to the existing dead spot. Though, that Ursa bass has two necks the other one being fretless (with ebony blank plank fingerboard modded by me from standard lined maple SX fretless neck). Luckily, the fretless neck has no dead spots and is absolutely amazing, so that is the one that usually stays on the bass.
  14. Rip Topaz

    Rip Topaz

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Likes Received:
    1
    Disclosures:
    Beta tester for Positive Grid
    Wow, really?

    Can we see the fretless? That sounds really cool.
  15. jdfarrell81

    jdfarrell81

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Likes Received:
    0
    The first SX short scale J-bass I ordered was fantastic. The second one had a body that was ridiculously small. It's a possibility to be aware of, but Kurt at Rondo is great with customer service.
  16. Mastermold

    Mastermold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Likes Received:
    2
    Disclosures:
    FireMelon
    The new SX five string headstock is larger than the older Sadowsky'ish one. I don't like it. But the four string models don't seem much larger if any.
  17. ronaldpdbrandt

    ronaldpdbrandt Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    Sponsored by The Letter G
  18. bassbenj

    bassbenj

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Here's some quick and dirty photos. Unfortunately my computer with the image adjusting software is dead so they are a bit dark, but you get the idea.

    [​IMG]

    and

    [​IMG]

    Cool new pickguard, eh? ;)

    Electronics have been changed: Vol with push-pull series/parallel; blend; tone; toggle switch for .015 ufd/off/.047 ufd.; jack. Still passive. Strings are GHS pressure-wounds. And Oh yeah, that is a Graphtech nut. I made the string tree out of a piece of stainless rod.

    Is this thing Booteek or what? it sounds as good as it looks!
  19. Rip Topaz

    Rip Topaz

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Likes Received:
    1
    Disclosures:
    Beta tester for Positive Grid
    Love it!! Great looking bass.
  20. 1bassleft

    1bassleft

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, that is so cheap. My two wishes are
    (1) that this bass:
    http://www.rondomusic.com/pisces2tslh.html

    had that headstock (although the current one is Tele-able) and, more importantly,

    (2) Rondo didn't insist on overseas buyers purchasing a hard case. I understand why, of course, but it adds to the cost, the shipping and all of that then adds to the import tax.

    It turns a no-brain bargain into a "hmm, think about it." My alternative option is the Czech (EU = no import tax) Bach:
    http://www.bachmusik.com/en/bach-bpb-60-but-lh_p1185

    but their lefty, although I like butterscotch, is horrible basswood - just about the worst thing for a trans finish. Last year, my son went on a school band trip to NY and DC - why didn't I get one posted to his hotel?:bawl:

Share This Page