1. Welcome to TalkBass 2014! If you're new here, we just went through a major site upgrade. Please post all concerns and bugs to the Forum Usage Issues forum. We will be monitoring that forum. Thank you for all of your feedback.

    The TalkBass iphone/android app is NOT WORKING currently. We're working on it. Tapatalk IS working, so if you need to use an app, use Tapatalk. Try using your browser though - TalkBass is now 100% responsive to your phone/tablet screen size ;)

    Please read the TalkBass 2014 FAQ for lots of great info on the new software.

what's the differ between string-through-body and topload?

Discussion in 'Hardware, Setup & Repair [BG]' started by hofai0927, Nov 13, 2012.

  1. hofai0927

    hofai0927

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    what's the differ between string-through-body and topload?
    is the string-through-body style made the tension bigger than topload style?
  2. C.Linton

    C.Linton Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    No difference, really.
  3. Metaldood19

    Metaldood19

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    None really. I used to run string through all the time until I started using circle K's. Top load from now on
  4. JAUQO III-X

    JAUQO III-X

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing artist:see profile.
    I can feel the difference and that is why I only top load(even on bass that string thru the back).


    I choose to top load because the strings feel looser and that is what I prefer.
  5. FretlessMainly

    FretlessMainly

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting, as I've read here that there is a difference not in string tension (which is established by nut to saddle distance), but in string pliability. I thought I'd read that body-through results in a slightly more pliable string.

    Mind you, I'm not making this claim, only repeating what I recall reading.
  6. walterw

    walterw Supportive Fender Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Likes Received:
    1
    i suspect even that difference would be minimal, because the strings bend at a very sharp angle where they go through the plate for through-body; that "locks" the string at that spot, so the leftover bit inside the body doesn't really get stretched with bends anymore.

    i like the idea of string-through, especially with a low-mass bridge. rock-solid mounting without excess weight and without all the string pull being focused as shearing stress against a few mounting screws. along with the low-mass bridge, it's supposed to get more of the body wood into the tone.

    the reality is there's probably no appreciable difference.
  7. JAUQO III-X

    JAUQO III-X

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    Endorsing artist:see profile.

    It is for me that's why I choose to top load.
  8. JTE

    JTE Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Likes Received:
    1
    Time already.for the monthly discussion of this topic? My how time flies...

    Search the TB records fir this topic as it cones up frequently - and.there is never anything new. There's the anecdotal commennts saying they know it makes a difference and the reasoned logic saying it doesn't and the emperical true side-by- side test.

    Bottom line is that string- through adds nothing.

    John
  9. Slowgypsy

    Slowgypsy 4 Fretless Strings Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some time ago I did a test for myself, using the same TI Jazz Flat strings and my MIA Precision.

    First did a top load. Did that one first because I thought the break angle on the saddles would not be all that severe. Played the bass for about an hour, and recorded it.

    Then I removed the strings and did a thru the body load. This was a royal pain as threading the strings thru the body with tuner curls on them... not fun. Played the bass for about an hour, and also recorded it.

    My own personal findings were that I could not tell the difference on the recordings between bottom or top load. I also could not feel any difference between the two different loads.

    However... there is a real and tangible difference between the two loading styles, especially if you have a bridge with quick load slots in it. Switching between different strings (if you're into that) is way easier to do with a top load.

    Sometimes my violin background has me liking top load better. And sometime my acoustic guitar background has me liking thru the body loading better. In the end... I believe it's simply a personal choice.
  10. rockinrayduke

    rockinrayduke Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Likes Received:
    0
    Same here. Plus I just don't see the point of stringing through anyway.
  11. mmbongo

    mmbongo Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Likes Received:
    11
    Stringing through body gives more downforce on the saddles which is always good. It also helps if you have longer strings to make sure the outer wraps do not go around the post.
  12. OnePluck@aTime

    OnePluck@aTime

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Likes Received:
    0
    Physics says that you get better tone, better sustain with thru-body threading as opposed to top threading. The more string that involves the guitar in what it's doing, the more the guitar will be involved. The difference between the two may not be noticeable but you can't argue with science. I don't have a preference. I'm using thru-body now with Fender S/S Strings. Great sustain.
  13. mongo2

    mongo2

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Likes Received:
    1
    Kindly explain the physics. Don't be afraid to get technical.
  14. mrbell321

    mrbell321

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed. I'd particularly like to know the physics behind "better tone".
    Also, you CAN argue science. That's what makes it better than other, more dogmatic systems of thought.

    Personally, I like string-through for what mmbongo mostly said, though I would have said it slightly different. String-through does not try to pull the bridge out of the body the way top-load does. There's obviously not a huge incidence of bridges popping off, but I just like the idea.

    Also, the back of my bass is pretty plain otherwise. 4 little chrome ferrule give it that something extra.
  15. C.Linton

    C.Linton Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you can't notice the difference, then the science is irrelevant. And I have my doubts about your version of science.
  16. Pilgrim

    Pilgrim Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Science takes a back seat to psycho-acoustics. That translates as: people have an incredible ability to hear what they WANT to hear - regardless of reality.
  17. Turnaround

    Turnaround

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    Bass Technician, Club Bass - Toronto
    Oh! I thought psycho-acoustics was "If that noise goes on any longer I am going to go crazy!" That's definitely NOT what I want to hear.
  18. hennessybass

    hennessybass Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Likes Received:
    0
    “The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” - Neil deGrasse Tyson:D
  19. JLS

    JLS Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disclosures:
    I setup & repair guitars & basses
    ...but often depending on how much something costs.:D
  20. C.Linton

    C.Linton Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with Tyson. I didn't say that I didn't necessarily believe the science, just that it's irrelevant. And I saw no indication of exactly what the science is that the poster was claiming. How can I believe/not believe something if I don't know what it is? :smug:

Share This Page