Which one to gig with?

Discussion in 'Basses [BG]' started by casotti1, Jan 30, 2014.


  1. casotti1

    casotti1 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    215
    Ok if you had a choice to take to a gig with you regarding performance, cutting through, tone and reliability amongst other things, which one would it be?
    -steinberger xl2
    -Warwick thumb nt4
     
  2. bassgod0dmw

    bassgod0dmw Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    11,352
    Location:
    White Plains
    Either would be fine but the Thumb gets the nod from me purely for aesthetic reasons ;)
     
  3. punkjazzben

    punkjazzben Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,709
    Location:
    Australia
    I would definitely take the Thumb :)
     
  4. casotti1

    casotti1 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    215
    I think as different as they are in all ways, people are more conscious of appearance. Perhaps if the xl had the looks of the thumb it may be a bit different?
     
  5. Register to disable this ad
  6. Slade N

    Slade N sunn #91 AZ Bands #? Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    481
    Location:
    az
    never played the xl but love my thumb
     
  7. Blue_Whistle88

    Blue_Whistle88 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    439
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    It'd be the Thumb for me too. They're famous for having a very cutting mid-range, and sit really well in any mix I find. They also look better IMO, though the neck dive might introduce palyability issues.
     
  8. joebar

    joebar Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    2,228
  9. ZachariahLee

    ZachariahLee

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2013
    Messages:
    113
    Location:
    Texas
    I'll choose the other one so it's feelings won't get hurt.
     
  10. Bassist4Eris

    Bassist4Eris Non Serviam Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,994
    Location:
    Scotia NY
    I'll choose the other one just because Warwicks have a bit too much growl for me (and I like a bit of growl).

    If it was just on looks, I'd go with the Warwick, but honestly I'm not a fan of the looks of either of those basses.
     
  11. Sartori

    Sartori

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    13,157
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area, CA
    Warwick, but I suppose the Steinberger could be a backup.
     
  12. Sid Fang

    Sid Fang Reformed Fusion Player Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Messages:
    902
    I've never gigged a Warwick, but I can say that I always found it amazingly easy to get good results with my Steinberger XL2. It was my go-to gigging bass for years. Compact, rugged, and stays in tune for weeks - literally.
     
  13. casotti1

    casotti1 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    215
    Interesting range of responses.. I love both. There is something about the xl2 emg humbuckers and unique construction, yet the thumb with its own unique construction, eq, pickups and woods that are special as well
     
  14. BioWeapon

    BioWeapon

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,033
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta
    As with the others, Thumb all the way.
    Very distinctive tone, great for cutting through. But hell, that Steinberger is small enough to bring to the gig in your back pocket as a backup, right? ;)
     
  15. casotti1

    casotti1 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    215
    It sure is! And it's got all the low end you need
     
  16. xkomo

    xkomo

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    78
    Location:
    Greece
    Thumb all the way
     
  17. Din Of Win

    Din Of Win

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,646
    Location:
    Frederick, Maryland

Share This Page