Who's right?

Discussion in 'Off Topic [BG]' started by faelcks, Jan 25, 2013.


  1. faelcks

    faelcks

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    My brother and i got into a very heated discussion about guitars, instruments and specially prices. One of us are saying "Prices are the measurement of quality of the guitar. Someone using a Squier or Epiphone are lower-level then Gibson or Fender. And studios use only their instruments, for CD's recording you can't use yours."

    Other thing discussed is about quality of one guy. The strokes guitarrist, Nick Valensi had a signature Epiphone. My brother said: "he had a signature epiphone because he's bad. If he was good he had one Gibson signature." after i replied " well, is because nick use a Epiphone, since he started." he answered "Well, he's stupid. Gibson always would be better than epiphones"

    Well. Is this something real? I wish to understand that. If he is right, i'm wrong about almost everything i belive in music, so give me what are your thoughts, please!
     
  2. ugly_bassplayer

    ugly_bassplayer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Location:
    Qu├ębec
  3. bassteban

    bassteban

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Location:
    Northern California
    I am not coming close to understanding the question here.
     
  4. hover

    hover

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Ok, which one said "nu-uh", and which one went "UH-HUH!"...? That will decide it.
     
  5. Register to disable this ad
  6. MatticusMania

    MatticusMania LANA! HE REMEMBERS ME!

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Location:
    Pomona, SoCal
    The OP is Phalex in disguise! faelcks, Phalex?

    Good one, Alex!
     
  7. Tituscrow

    Tituscrow Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Location:
    NW England
  8. faelcks

    faelcks

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    now i see the your point. Thanks

    Its that:
    1: Sub-brands(epiphone and squier) are so overwhelming worst than their counterpart(gibson and fender)?

    2: A guy endorsed by Epiphone is worst for not being endorsed for gibson?
     
  9. faelcks

    faelcks

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    Sorry about the hard english guys. I'm typing in my cellphone, and english(obviously) is not my main language.
     
  10. MatticusMania

    MatticusMania LANA! HE REMEMBERS ME!

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Location:
    Pomona, SoCal
    Your brother sounds like a guy who dont know too much about things.
     
  11. macaroni tony

    macaroni tony

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
    Location:
    Tustin, CA
    whomever gives the best wedgies. that's who is right
     
  12. hover

    hover

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    You did pretty good there.
     
  13. Tituscrow

    Tituscrow Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Location:
    NW England
  14. smperry

    smperry Moderator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Media:
    1
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Your brother is wrong. Good day sir.
     
  15. bassteban

    bassteban

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Location:
    Northern California
    I did not mean to criticize your English, just stating I did not understand. I believe Epiphone makes some fine instruments, and Gibsons are often overrated.
     
  16. Unrepresented

    Unrepresented Something Borderline Offensive Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Media:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Instruments that cost less do so because they either:

    1) have cheaper parts
    2) have cheaper design
    3) have cheaper assembly costs

    whether any of those translate to "better" or "worse" is for you to decide.

    Endorsements are financial transactions, not necessarily a measure of any skill other than increasing profit margins.

    And if you pay a studio to record, you choose what gear you want used, not them.
     
  17. Eric Perry

    Eric Perry

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Location:
    Make a left at the Taco Bell
    This pretty much sums it up.
     
  18. LiquidMidnight

    LiquidMidnight

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2000
    +1

    I think it's an argument about price being an indicator of quality, but then it turned into a tangent about the prestige of the company offering a signature model being an indicator of the ability of the player who has the signature model...I think. :eyebrow:
     
  19. faelcks

    faelcks

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    That's it. Too many questions, too little text.
     
  20. hover

    hover

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    I've seen a few instances where players started off with the tres-spendy signature models, then had subsequent ones offered on the "lower tier" line...does your brother think that means the player was awesome then got really bad so they punished him/her? Thoughts?
     
  21. nutso42

    nutso42

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Location:
    Your location can be this long
    It doesn't matter what brand it is... it matters how much work they put into it.

    For instance, an $800 Epiphone is probably going to be better than an $800 Gibson.
    This is because an $800 guitar would be high-end for Epi, while 800 is measly pocket change from Gibson.
    So Gibs would slap the guitar together and ship it out, while Epi would be much more careful with theirs.

    If you're on a budget, get a high-end guitar from a budget company. Much better quality for the same price.
     

Share This Page