A triangle has three sides, 1.6m, 1.9m and 0.32m. What are the three angles within the triangle? We have the answer, but apparently my math skills aren't working for such a basic question. Could someone do this question and provide your steps as well? I thought I knew how to do this, but apparently my answer doesn't match.
Yes of course, but the problem is that we aren't given any angles to start with. My thought was to plug all the given sides into the cosine law, and do inverse cos at the end to find the angle (then repeat for the other angles) however our answers always end up wrong. I've been through 2 university calculus courses, yet this just isn't working for me. (trying to help someone)
18.612 deg 157.727 deg 3.66 deg using law of Cosines A² = B² + C² −2(B)(C)cos(angle 1) B² = A² + C² −2(A)(C)cos(angle 2) C² = A² + B² −2(A)(B)cos(angle 3) A,B and C being the lengths of the sides
That is exactly what I did, I just felt that 3.66 was a bit far from the given solution of 3.3. The given answers are: 3.3 158.1 19.5 See? We got the same answers as you, so why are their given solutions all off? Would the professor do this on purpose, or how else could the given solutions be that far off? Thanks a lot for helping out!
ah yes...me too..too many years since I got my EE. We did all this stuff on a slide rule back then. Boy, I'm dating myself now
Because there is no truth. One answer is as good as another. And I see you're in Canada. Maybe that's it.
maybe the prof is trying to throw you off to prove him wrong...I had a circuits analyses prof do that a few times, just to see if we were on our toes... Math is either right or wrong...if you and I came up with the same answer irrespective of each other, then I would say the prof is wrong
I must be a sucker for pain...I loved trig. I hated probability and statistics...I used to call it "unmath". To many variables and unknowns for me to be called "real" math...
This is possible. I think maybe he might just be trying to make them 100% confident in their math skills so they won't feel the need to check their answers. Personally I dont agree with that, you're trying to learn the material and I've always found that having the answers present allows me to confirm that I'm actually learning and not just guessing. But hey it's not my program.
Maybe someone could give my other question a shot? http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?p=9727367&posted=1#post9727367
Draw a picture of it. But scale it down to centimeters or something. I could do it in AutoCAD if I had AutoCAD at my fingertips, but I'm on my MacBook.
all angles=180 degrees. 1.6+1.9+0.32=3.82 180 divided by 3.82= 47.1020419blah 47.1 times 0.32=15.08 47.1 times 1.6= 75.4 47.1 times 1.9=89.53 took a quick chance on this,,,any doubts?
That won't work - the ratio of the angles is not just the ratio of the sides. Consider the pythagorean triad 3, 4, 5. The side opposite the right angle would be exactly half the perimeter if your method worked; clearly this is not the case. Given 3 sides of a triangle, you use the cosine rule to work out the biggest angle and then the sine rule to get one of the other two angles. Then get the final angle by subtraction from 180.
Here are some related products that TB members are talking about. Clicking on a product will take you to TB’s partner, Primary, where you can find links to TB discussions about these products. Browser not compatible