I have the possibility of getting a bass made in the near future (If I don't snag a used deal in the meantime). So the issue is, I considered an ash body, and got replied that I could choose between "regular" ash, and the so called, very well known "swamp" ash, that we all love for our snap and punch. so exactly what tells these woods apart? The looks? the weight? the overall tone? If you have a bass made of this so called normal ash, feel free to post it.
Ash will be *just a hair* brighter. Doubt most folks could hear it, and its nothing that a technique or control adjustment can't comp for. and MUCH heavier. Swamp ash is my fav bass body wood, no doubt.
So soundwise they're pretty much identical huh? Weight may not be an issue, the builder in question has a very sleek design, which could avoid the bass from bein burdensome.
but lighter is always better. True, swamp ash is a bit more $$, but tone-wise? If you can really tell the difference, you have better ears than me. You will get much more tone difference in the p'ups you select and the strings you use. MUCH.
you'd be surprised how much the opposite can be relevant. (meaning, doing the opposite of what you say, keeping a specific electronic pack, and changing body woods) But yes, you are still right obviously, and I do take weight as serious business, a heavy instrument will quickly make my neck sore after around 1 hour on my feet.
big difference in sound. lightweight swamp ash has a bloom to the note. somewhat airy and a bit hollow. higher denisty, heavy ash has much more attack on the note and doesnt bloom. smacks you in the face more if you will. ill put up with the weight for the tone.
IIRC, hard ash is quite similar to maple in weight, appearance and tone: Heavy, dense, light in color, quite bright in tone, with lots of attack and sustain. Perhaps a bit compressed-sounding, as opposed to open-sounding. A little more apparent grain in the finish compared to maple... MM