1. Please take 30 seconds to register your free account to remove most ads, post topics, make friends, earn reward points at our store, and more!  
     
    TalkBass.com has been uniting the low end since 1998.  Join us! :)

Cakewalk Sonar

Discussion in 'Recording Gear and Equipment [BG]' started by Josh Ryan, Jun 4, 2001.


  1. Josh Ryan

    Josh Ryan - that dog won't hunt, Monsignor. Supporting Member

    Mar 24, 2001
    Anyone have this? Do you like it? Anything I should watch out for before I ditch 9? It seems great to me so far.
     
  2. Oysterman

    Oysterman

    Mar 30, 2000
    Sweden
    I don't know... I haven't discovered what the real differences between Sonar and PA9 are, except for the interface. Could you please give me a hint?
     
  3. JMX

    JMX Vorsprung durch Technik

    Sep 4, 2000
    Cologne, Germany
    I saw it on a friend's PC, the possibility of DXi instruments is nice, and so is the low latency with the SBLive.
    And with the Amulet VST/DX adapter you can use VST fx.
    But I don't know if it's worth trashing CW9.
     
  4. Josh Ryan

    Josh Ryan - that dog won't hunt, Monsignor. Supporting Member

    Mar 24, 2001
    That's sort pf how I see it. Low latency=good, more flexibilty(dx)=good, better gui=good.
     
  5. Josh Ryan

    Josh Ryan - that dog won't hunt, Monsignor. Supporting Member

    Mar 24, 2001
    Oysterman, I'm not posing a riddle, I was hoping to hear about any problems I might run into or added benefits I might overlook, that's all.
     
  6. JMX

    JMX Vorsprung durch Technik

    Sep 4, 2000
    Cologne, Germany
  7. Josh Ryan

    Josh Ryan - that dog won't hunt, Monsignor. Supporting Member

    Mar 24, 2001