Psst... Ready to join TalkBass and start posting, make new friends, sell your gear, and more?  Register your free account in 30 seconds.

Cakewalk Sonar

Discussion in 'Recording Gear and Equipment [BG]' started by Josh Ryan, Jun 4, 2001.


  1. Josh Ryan

    Josh Ryan - that dog won't hunt, Monsignor. Staff Member Supporting Member

    Mar 24, 2001
    Anyone have this? Do you like it? Anything I should watch out for before I ditch 9? It seems great to me so far.
     
  2. Oysterman

    Oysterman

    Mar 30, 2000
    Sweden
    I don't know... I haven't discovered what the real differences between Sonar and PA9 are, except for the interface. Could you please give me a hint?
     
  3. JMX

    JMX Vorsprung durch Technik

    Sep 4, 2000
    Cologne, Germany
    I saw it on a friend's PC, the possibility of DXi instruments is nice, and so is the low latency with the SBLive.
    And with the Amulet VST/DX adapter you can use VST fx.
    But I don't know if it's worth trashing CW9.
     
  4. Josh Ryan

    Josh Ryan - that dog won't hunt, Monsignor. Staff Member Supporting Member

    Mar 24, 2001
    That's sort pf how I see it. Low latency=good, more flexibilty(dx)=good, better gui=good.
     
  5. Josh Ryan

    Josh Ryan - that dog won't hunt, Monsignor. Staff Member Supporting Member

    Mar 24, 2001
    Oysterman, I'm not posing a riddle, I was hoping to hear about any problems I might run into or added benefits I might overlook, that's all.
     
  6. JMX

    JMX Vorsprung durch Technik

    Sep 4, 2000
    Cologne, Germany
  7. Josh Ryan

    Josh Ryan - that dog won't hunt, Monsignor. Staff Member Supporting Member

    Mar 24, 2001