Dismiss Notice

Psst... Ready to join TalkBass and start posting, make new friends, sell your gear, and more?  Register your free account in 30 seconds.

Comparing AG500 and the iamp 800

Discussion in 'Amps and Cabs [BG]' started by farboozle, Nov 15, 2004.


  1. farboozle

    farboozle

    Apr 18, 2000
    Fairfax VA
    Well, I thought I'd post some thoughts on these two amps, since they will likely be on the list of possibilities for some people. I've been playing with the iamp 800 for about a year now, and just got my ag500 up and running. Understand now, I'm really only looking for one sound, something I can hear on stage in loud loud bands and will have some oomph in the tone section. So versatility is not something I'm looking for. I've always found the Iamp to be a little dissappointing, which is why I bought an ag500 in hopes of the vaunted aguilar plug-and-play tone.

    I'll post comments based on the situations I play in:

    Rehersal:

    I stacked both amps so I could A/B them through the my aggie 112 stack. I was actually pretty surprised at the similarity in sound between the two amps. The iamp seemed like it had a little more in the low end. The aguilar definitely has a "sound" to my ears, while I can see that people who prefer something with less color would choose the iamp. I liked the coloration. My basses still sounded like my basses, but with a little more oomph and a little more evenness across the neck. I could hear the notes on the d and g string a lot better, fuller tone for higher notes. This was a fairly quiet band, so either amp was fine for volume. This band also leaves a lot of room in the mix.

    This round went to the ag500 for me.

    Gig 1:

    So I was expecting to be blown away for this gig given how the amp sounded during rehersal. Too bad, so sad. I brought just the ag500 (no switching during gig) to play with my schroeder 410. I would say it was probably louder than the iamp, but the tone which had cut through in rehersal still got eaten by the guitarist and drummer. This is a different band, they are unbelievably loud and don't leave a lot of room in the mix. The notes on the d and g string were a little clearer than in the past, but I was a little underwhelmed. Mind you, I didn't have the opportunity to fiddle with the eq at all.

    Not the kind of review which describes the tone of each amp in poetry, but I'll post more after I bring both amps to 2 rehersals this week. If people have specific questions about the 2 heads, I'll try to answer . . .
     
  2. hey man go with aguilar they kick ass my friend runs that head and has never had a problem and its got a lot of bang
     
  3. gfab333

    gfab333

    Mar 22, 2000
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Farboozle,

    I've been playing an iAMP 800 since they first came out. I've tried the Aggie 750 in a local store a few times and thought it sounded great; I haven't tried the 500 yet. Just curious, what kind of music do you play?

    I've noticed that my iAMP seems to perform very well in a jazz, R & B, or pop music format. Although the amp has a lot of headroom and a fat bottom, it doesn't seem to function well in a rock music environment for some reason. I find that my Eden head sounds better for rock. Just my humble opinion. If you're playing rock or metal, I'd expect the Aggie to sound a little better than the iAMP as far as tone within the framework of the band mix.
     
  4. farboozle

    farboozle

    Apr 18, 2000
    Fairfax VA
    Well, the quiet band plays a mix of blues/rock/funk, we're still developing a sound. The loud^2 band plays rock, like rage against the machine. I had also expected the aggie to far outshine the iamp in that setting. But like I said, the aggie sounded a little thin in the gig setting.