full top, no doubt. By the way, the shape of the bass painted on that top looks a lot like a Lakland body shape. keep groooovin' Fran
Full top. Uh, no, show the stringers... No, wait, full top. uhhh... Aaaarggghhh! I'm glad I'm not the one having to choose, I'd get no sleep! Either will look great!
The neck wouldn't have to go down the middle-the top is bookmatched so they could be pulled apart so the middle's still there, but I know what you mean. Y'know, for some reason I don't like the looks of wide open tops with just lightwaves or piezos. I love the look of woods, but I just never got into the no pickup look. It's weird. Ah well. From what I've heard, I probably like the traditional sounds of mags over lightwaves (definitely over piezos).
If you cover that beautiful piece of wood with that orange sandwich neck thing, I'm going to come to your house and smack you myself. On the other hand, if you cover the neck with that beautiful top, you will have my respect for all things beautiful. But seriously. It's your bass. You have to look at it and play it. Do what you like. Good luck.
I'd go for a complete top were it my bass... BTW...Beautiful piece of wood!!! It's gonna be GAWGEOUS!!!
Heres a finished Fiddle back top http://www.thelowend.net/gallery/viewtopic.php?t=481 Very cool buckeye, but very different then what most see.
Here's three version's I knocked up based on the samples above. 1. Just the woood: 2. Through neck stringers 3. A combo idea (moving the two sections of the top to keep the eyes and loose some of the darker, less patterned area). While it's a gorgeous bit of wood in it's own right, I do quite like the contrast between the chaotic pattern of the body and the geometric precision of the stringers. Wulf
Now that I've seen the actual neck laminates, I agree they're beautiful. I'm sticking with my original vote, though--keep the top whole, and let the laminates just be somthing to liven up the back, which would probably be pretty plain otherwise. Mike