Hi TB, I just purchased a lovely Mij fender 62 reissue pbass in Fiesta red on ebay. I have owned almost a dozen Japanese fenders over the years and although this one is indeed a nice playing bass the stamps on the neck and neck pocket look way different from any I've seen before. There was no hand written date. I'm afraid it could be a partbass that someone thru decals on or a classic vibe that someone dressed up. Another issue of note is that it doesn't have the strap button on the back of the head stock like all my previous 62's have. I hope I'm wrong but wanted to ask while I still have time to return to the seller. Thanks
I've said this many times before, and I'll say it again. No one is gonna fake a MIJ or MIM Fender (especially when it's a reissue, and not an original). The only time you should be worried is when you buy a used MIA Fender, or if you happen to be dealing with the most stupid person on the planet. It should be fine. If you don't mind me asking, how much did you pay for it?
I can't imagine anyone investing enough to make a convincing fake of what at the time was itself considered a "fake Fender" by many. That is, sometimes the best fake Fenders are Fender's own fake Fenders. The question I have is always the same - does it sound and feel like it should for what you paid for it? If someone were to go through the effort of faking a MIJ '62 reissue, and got close enough that it plays and sounds convincingly well, then you got what you paid for in terms of quality / $ anyway.
Thanks for the kind help. I paid 850 which is a bit high but it's an mij 94-95 which was a solid era. It's a rare color, mint conditon, has a fralin, hipshot reverse tuners and new shielding and cts pots. It honestly plays better than the last us avri 62 I owned. My 93-94 mij is ridiculous. Plays better than anything else I've ever touched. Lakland, vintage fender, etc.
Just for clarification: MIJ signifies that all components were made in Japan? and CIJ signifies basically that it was assembled in Japan with parts sourced from other countries? Or does either one signify which Japanese guitar manufacturer built whichever?
Are you sure? It looks like a '09. http://www2.fender.com/support/articles/japanese-instruments-product-dating/#prodRef Just scroll down a little further on the page.
My understanding is that they are the same machines, simply made during a different era of fender japan.
Yeah. That lighting on the pic of the truss rod threw me but the rest of the markings & text styles of the stamps & decals & finish work seems too usual to be faked.
Hmm, now, on the other hand, if the seller passed off a newer reissue as an older, more valuable reissue, and charged a premium based on that, then yeah, I would say OP has a valid misrepresentation complaint. But again, if it plays and sounds like it's worth it, it's worth it, always my position.
@devinp17 you are right. @bholder you're right. You're right. I'll check but I don't think he stated the year. He simply gave me the serial and I ran it through guitar serial dater. .
If I recall my reading, CIJ vs MIJ is simply a naming method, it's all marketing. They changed sometime in the '90s. You could easily say your MIM Fenders were "Crafted in Aztlan" if you wanted too and be as valid.
CIJ and MIJ differentiates the factory it was made at Fujigen and Tokai. There are 1990's and 2000's CIJ & MIJ basses I had a 2006 CIJ
http://www2.fender.com/support/articles/japanese-instruments-product-dating/ It appears you are correct, but at the same time not enough that I'm admitting I was giving bad info.
The serial number/dating has always been iffy with the Japanese made instruments. All that matters is that they are very good basses.