DIY cab for a Dayton PA380-8?

Discussion in 'Amps and Cabs [BG]' started by lossfizzle, Jul 16, 2013.

  1. lossfizzle

    lossfizzle

    Jul 8, 2013
    I've noticed the PA380-8 getting some favorable mention around here and I can get special pricing on it that makes it even more attractive. I want to build a small, light-(and-kinda-cheap-)as-possible 1x15, mostly for low-key rehearsals and smaller gigs. PE themselves suggest a ported cab of only 1.55cf for this driver with a Fs of 65Hz resulting. That, like, can't be right, can it?
     
  2. will33

    will33

    May 22, 2006
    austin,tx
    1.5 cu.ft. is going to neuter ANY 15, unless it's for a sealed box and meant to be run that way.

    Sure that box design wasn't for a midbass, meant to be run with a sub?
     
  3. lossfizzle

    lossfizzle

    Jul 8, 2013
    I can't be sure, no - but in the driver specs this is the "optimum enclosure" it gives "based on BassBox 'optimum' calculations".

    Not sure I know what I'm doing with WinISD just yet, but when I patch in a 1.55cf enclosure ported at 65Hz, it's coming up with 3dB down at 60Hz and almost -11dB at 50.

    The flattest charted response I've been able to come up with for the 380 in WinISD is an enclosure about 2.5cf ported at 45-50Hz. That gives me 60-200 +/- 1dB, 3dB down at 50 and about 8-9dB down at 40.

    If I embiggenate the hypothetical enclosure from there, I just end up with a big scooped hump at the tuning frequency but comparatively little gain at 40Hz. Seems like it would take a 6+ cf enclosure to get me 40Hz at -3dB and I already have a 1x15 cab that big-- which has inspired me to build something else I can actually stand hauling around for dumb stuff around town.

    Anyway, I'm just wondering if anyone out there is using the 380 in a relatively small box and having good results with it. I guess the suggested 1.5cf WAS too good to be true, but...
     
  4. will33

    will33

    May 22, 2006
    austin,tx
    I totally dig "embiggenating".

    I'd have to dig deeper to have any more input worth a damn.
     
    PawleeP likes this.
  5. Arjank

    Arjank

    Oct 9, 2007
    Above Amsterdam
    That Dayton PA380 really would run nicely ina 3cu ft cab tuned to 45-50hz like you said. 1.5cu ft (ported) is really to small and that drivers isn't designed for closed cabs (Qes is only 0.24).
     
  6. lossfizzle

    lossfizzle

    Jul 8, 2013
    Thanks Arjank... like I said, I'm new to trying proper cab design (vs. dumping drivers in a given empty box and hoping for the best). The 3cf / 45Hz hypothetical result does definitely look OK but I'm wondering if I should up it to 3.5-4. I'd get a couple more dB at 40Hz and the enclosure really wouldn't be that much bigger.

    The only thing that sort of worries me is the seemingly unavoidable location of the hump as the enclosure grows, focused right around 50-60Hz - I take it from lurking in a lot of these threads that a bump a little farther north (like in the 60-80 range) is more ideal if you have to have a FR bulge anywhere down there. (it's not so much the bump that bothers me, actually, as much as the resulting scoop in the 100-300 range that also grows with the enclosure size, although I guess we're still talking about 1-2dB.)

    I'm kind of thinking the 3.5 may be my best bet but maybe more experienced builders would have comment?

    (all shown graphs w/ 380 ported at 45Hz, top row: 2.5/3cf, bottom row: 3.5/4cf)

    vented-isdcomposite.gif
     
  7. will33

    will33

    May 22, 2006
    austin,tx
    IMO, -3db @ 50hz already makes for a pretty deep sounding speaker, plenty of typical 410's, etc. roll off higher than that.

    I'd compare max power handling charts and see how much your excursion limit goes down with each larger box size. That's going to be your fartout limits.
     
  8. lossfizzle

    lossfizzle

    Jul 8, 2013
    Great idea, followed by totally stupid question: Does the free WinISD have excursion limit graphing (or display) hidden somewhere?

    All I've been able to find is the SPL graph which is basically just a mirror of the FR graph but with actual dB figures. (118dB @ 1m w/ 100w input... should be more than good enough for what I'm doing with this cab.)

    I believe what you're saying about the typical 4x10s etc - I'm just a little scared here because I'm way more experienced with hifi speaker specs than performance-cab spec'ing. I normally look for no more than -3dB @ 45 or lower in a stereo speaker, but at this stage I have no idea what a great sounding bass rig looks like when tested and graphed out.
     
  9. chienmort

    chienmort

    Aug 15, 2012
  10. will33

    will33

    May 22, 2006
    austin,tx
    If you're using WinISD Alpha Pro, it's in the dropdown menu above the graph where all the other choices are, like spl, transfer function, port air velocity, etc. I don't remember from the old Beta version but I think it at least has a cone excursion chart. There you'd just try higher and higher input signals until the graph reaches the line of the drivers xmax spec.

    Alpha Pro is also free download. If you don't have it, I'd get it. It's more detailed...more charts, etc. Don't know if it's been mentioned, but I'd use a minimum of two 4" ID ports if you're using pipes. Or at least the equivelent amount of area if using another style of port. More is OK. Less can lead to problems with drivers that have any good amount of xmax...say 3-3.5mm or more.

    Re: your stereo speaker designs......yes, you'd want deeper like that for full reproduction of recorded music without a sub. For a live bass rig...not so much. Some like it. It isn't really "needed". More of a subjective taste thing.


    FWIW, a lot of live concert subs are highpassed @ 40hz and the bass is usually slotted just above the kick drum (but still below everything else (obviously). IMO, 50hz is plenty deep. Could reach deeper if it doesn't give up too much excursion limited power handling. Some all-in-one bass amps have the very bottom filtered down, some don't. Many good sounding bass cabs start to roll off higher than that. The SVT 810 rolls off higher still, up around 80-100 hz, but at a more gradual rate being a sealed design.

    If it's difficult to make the choice...it's easier to shrink a box than it is to expand one. :)
     
  11. lossfizzle

    lossfizzle

    Jul 8, 2013
    Thanks guys. That was super helpful (especially the advice on porting, I've been confused about that too - thanks Will). I didn't know that the "pro" version of ISD was also free, I'll go roll with that and see what I can find out. Yeah, I believe I've got the T/S specs etc. for the 380 already entered correctly.
     
  12. majortoby

    majortoby

    Jul 2, 2009
    Tampa, Fl USA
    whoah. 70 bucks for one of these???? Really gets a man to thinking...
     
    PawleeP likes this.
  13. PawleeP

    PawleeP

    Oct 8, 2012
    East Coast
    thanx wull..
    looks like these daytons require bigger ports than (for example) a cb158?
    do you'allz think these freq specs are real.. 4k seems a little exaggerated for a 3" voice coil 15..
    has anyone tested the freq. resp of these?
     
  14. bobcruz

    bobcruz

    Mar 10, 2004
    CA
  15. BadExample

    BadExample

    Jan 21, 2016
    Injiana
    IDK how your discount works, but I'd look at some other 15's near that price as well. Go +/- a few cheese burgers worth of pesos and there are quite a few. Many of the eminence give drawings for several different cab sized and sealed or ported. First cab, sealed is a lot simpler and there is a lot more room for error as far as getting the volume right. @basscooker has done well with very inexpensive MCM drivers. This one will be more since you get a discount at PE, but it sounds great in a 3 cu ft sealed cab. Heavy old school sucka. MCM Audio Select 500W Rms 4 Ohm Paper Cone Woofer 15 Inch Die Cast | 55-3243 (553243) | MCM Audio Select would not fart out on one channel of my BX1600 until I dimed all the knobs and hit it hard. I moved on to an Eminence 3015 modified with an aluminum cone, but the MCM PA driver had more low end.
     
  16. PawleeP

    PawleeP

    Oct 8, 2012
    East Coast
    thanx bad example
    cool, but it's a 500 watt speaker with 100oz magnet, and costs more than a cb154 for a 4 ohm, and the specs say it goes only to 2.5k, was kinda thinking a full range speaker for this ampeg 15e cab i got.
    but i will ck out bass cookers page too!
    p
     
    BadExample likes this.
  17. PawleeP

    PawleeP

    Oct 8, 2012
    East Coast
    good info..
    Sounds like this dayton may be good for this empty 115 ampeg (w 3 little ports on bottom) that i have (is around 2.7 cf i think)
    i got it use with a gummed up bw 15 (4ohm) pretty sure that 2.7 was too small for the peavey BW anyways?