1. Please take 30 seconds to register your free account to remove most ads, post topics, make friends, earn reward points at our store, and more!  

E902 vs Beta52

Discussion in 'Recording Gear and Equipment [BG]' started by Uziel, Sep 15, 2008.


  1. Uziel

    Uziel

    Sep 2, 2003
    France
    for those who tried both, what difference did you noticed ?
     
  2. Uziel

    Uziel

    Sep 2, 2003
    France
    bump
     
  3. JimmyM

    JimmyM Supporting Member

    Apr 11, 2005
    Apopka, FL
    Endorsing: Ampeg Amps, EMG Pickups
    Dude, don't mic with a kick drum mic. All you'll get are lows and highs. Great if you're a scooper, but otherwise it's horrible for bass. You're better off using a 57 or 58 if you have no other mics. Use a mic that has fairly flat response.
     
  4. fokof

    fokof One day ,I'll be in the future

    Mar 16, 2007
    Here
    Like Jimmy sais , both have an EQ applied.

    The beta52 is more standard , more used everywhere.
    I don't say it sounds better , just used more.
    I hate both personaly , try a ATM25 or a PL20/RE20 instead for a kick.
     
  5. The Beta52 has, as already described, an EQ curve built in that makes it sound horrible on bass. The 902 is slightly flatter, but still not great.

    What you ideally want is a mic with a flat frequency response, such as the sennheiser MD421 or an EV RE20.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.