Yesterday, around 5 in the afternoon, we had a pretty frightening earthquake. Here's the info: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10901290 I read a couple of American reports and they are horribly erroneous, so steer clear of them According to the Las Vegas Guardian we are 76km south of Brooklyn and 8km east of Sirolo, Italy that's news to me! The same paper, in another article, reported that the epicentre was near Seddon, a town in Autralia, but it was off the coast of Seddon at the top of the South Island, New Zealand. We've had a couple of the last few days, but the 6.5 (some are saying 6.9) yesterday was the scariest. I was at work, sweeping up out back when it happened and just stood there in shock watching the pub shake. My girlfriend was also at work, and she's really shaken about it all, especially considering her workplace is marked by the Earthquake Commission as being unsafe, in need of seismic strengthening etc. Since the Christchurch earthquake 2 years ago, this has set a lot of us on edge. There's one way in and out of Wellington and it's right on the main fault line.
Scary times down there. I lived in Hamilton for 5 years and didn't feel a single earthquake. Wellington is pretty crazy from a fault perspective. Scary place to live, considering the Quay, Beehive, etc., were all under water ~ 100 years ago until a quake pushed the land up out of the water.
I grew up in Tauranga and only felt a handful over the 18 years before I moved here. Yeah, a decent amount of Wellington is reclaimed land, so it's somewhat worrying. I hear a lot of people say things like "regular, smaller earthquakes are good because they're letting off pressure instead of it all coming in one". I don't know if there's any truth in that. Any seismologists here? I hope it's the case, though. I don't know how we'd cope with one like Christchurch. People have been saying Wellington is due for a big one for a while now. I don't quite understand that thought, cause when it comes to earthquakes we're just guessing and in the dark, really.
Cheers for the kind words, guys. Really, we're fine where we are. We live a bit further out of the city in a timber frame house that's been standing for 100 years, so I'm not too bothered. It's those in the city like my brother, sister and friends who are in big concrete apartment buildings that I worry about. A few friends live on the 7th floor of an apartment building and their place was trashed. They thought it was gonna come down with all of them in there.
I experienced my first earthquake ever about 2 years ago. Fortunately it was so minor that it was barely noticeable. I've often thought about how much it must stink to get caught in a bigger one though...ugh.. glad you're ok, stay safe
Wow. That must have been a few moments of utter terror. Give me the cold, wet hills of Northern England any day of the week!
I'm not a seismologist. But, as geologist I know a bit about faults and quakes. When the earth scientists say that you may be due for a large quake, that's based upon research of past earthquakes. Using various dating techniques, the scientists can generate a record of time intervals between large quakes on a given fault system and then extrapolate that to give an idea of future risk. It's not very precise because the intervals can be hundreds or even thousands of years. It is useful to the extent that building codes can be updated to reflect the risk of that event. For example, if a fault system shows large breaks on an average of 500 years and it's been 800 since the last large quake, then you can figure that pressure has been building up for all that time and may be ready for a release sooner rather than later.
That makes sense, thanks NWB. Our last major one was about 120 years ago, and it's the biggest in NZ's modern history. There are whole suburbs and towns that are built on land that wasn't there before 1891.
Oh...if the land that these towns and suburbs was uplifted from the ocean, then it can also go back down. However, the overall fault movement is more likely upwards. Seattle, Washington also has areas that were uplifted from Puget Sound. 120 years isn't very much time geologically speaking and it seems unlikely that a great deal of stress has built up in that relatively short timeframe. The Alpine Fault of NZ has quite a record of very large quakes.
Those of us who live near plate boundaries have to be ready for earthquakes. Here's a link to the details of the earthquake.
This particular earthquake was predominantly lateral movement, though, which is somewhat atypical of plate boundaries in that region. North of NZ, the Pacific Plate is being thrust toward the west, under the Australian Plate. South of NZ, the direction is reversed, with the Australian plate being thrust eastward under the Pacific Plate. So the islands of New Zealand seem to be situated in a transform zone where lateral movement accommodates the change in stress orientation indicated by the reversal of thrusting. Here's a link to the moment tensor diagram (beach ball) indicating strike-slip movement at the hypocenter. That's all I got.