Eden 410XLT cab Vs. GK 410RBH cab

Discussion in 'Amps and Cabs [BG]' started by booch, Jun 26, 2005.

  1. booch


    Aug 12, 2004
    Anybody out there who played both? How would you describe the sound of each?

    It seems I'm gonna borrow an Eden WT800 head for the summer to gig with. I already have an Eden 210XST cab and I'd like to get something under it. Right now I have these two options.

    I like the typical Eden sound, not too aggressive, while clearly audible and gives a solid foundation. I haven't tried a GK 410RBH cab yet, but as far as my experience with GK goes, they prefer the more aggressive sound.

  2. Plain Old Me

    Plain Old Me

    Dec 14, 2004
    The GK is built to be more Hi-Fi, and for rock I would definately choose the Eden 410. Its got tone to spare. And it will love the 800. I also find the Eden a bit more efficent than the GK.
  3. booch


    Aug 12, 2004
    I play a lot of styles so it's not necessarily rock.

    "Efficient" as loud? (I'm not an English native so sorry if

    I'm asking the obvious) Do you think the GK provides a weaker

  4. BigMikeW

    BigMikeW Banned

    May 25, 2005
    Nashville, TN.
    Banned by TB Administration for refusal to account for funds
  5. Plain Old Me

    Plain Old Me

    Dec 14, 2004
    What I mean by efficent is that the Eden uses the watts you feed it better. It will get louder than the GK with just as many watts.
  6. Agreed, I played both and the eden is my preference.
  7. booch


    Aug 12, 2004
    Seems unanimous :)

    Thanks guys!
  8. My next cab will be an Eden 410. So expensive though.
  9. Munjibunga

    Munjibunga Total Hyper-Elite Member Gold Supporting Member

    May 6, 2000
    San Diego (when not at Groom Lake)
    Independent Contractor to Bass San Diego
    I'd stick with the Eden D-410XLT. It'll really explode your tone along with that 210XST. I use a 410XLT under a 210XLT outdoors, and it fairly rules.