Hi Folks, A very basic question, but. Say you walk Db7 going up a cadence to Gb maj7, the notes being Db - D - Eb - F - Gb, in the 1st position starting with 4th finger. There is two ways to do finger it - a) Db(4) - D(0) - Eb(1) - F(4) - Gb(4) or b) Db(4) - D(0) - Eb(1) - F(2) - Gb(4) Which one do you prefer and which is academically 'correct'? I personally prefer the a) one because it seems to me it gives me less 'wiggling'&more stability and precision. I've been playing like b) all the time (remnants from bass guitar), but now discovered I could improve my technique by adopting a). Any thoughts?
I always try to use open strings whenever possible, because they're in perfect tune, and because you get some rest for your left hand, so looks like win-win.
Just me: B, pivoting the thumb between Eb(1) and F(2). I feel that pivot is easier to be precise when I change fingers during the pivot. If I played F(4) - pivot - Gb(4), I'd need to control myself not to play audible slide. Sliding is okay, but sparingly. I can't really play Db and Ab major scales with classic Simandl fingering, it gets exhausting quickly.
I would use "B" since that would be the "correct" fingering on a Db major scale- at least that's how I was taught
I'd do B unless the next stop was Ab on the D string, in which case I would probably play the Gb with 1. I think I can count on one hand the number of places where I do the 4-4 shift, one of the simandl etudes is the only thing I can think of offhand.
I would do option b). I personally tend to avoid ascending 4 - 4 shifts and descending 1 - 1 shifts when possible.
b), given those two choices But, if this line actually came up while playing, I probably wouldn't use the open string.
I say get comfy with both, but B is likely what i would do, although my actual line would likely be Db Eb E F Gb.
Pivoting is flimsy for a solid, quarter note walking line. A shift is worth it for stability. I wouldn't recommend ANY pivoting for jazz ensemble playing. In a fast solo it might prove worthwhile.