Could someone give me, or point me to, a primer on the differences in construction and in sound (yeah, I know ...) between a flat back and a round back double bass? It seems there are fine orchestra instruments made both ways and orchestral instruments is my interest. The only thing I seem to remember is that flat backs are harder to make. Thanks much in advance. -S-
Google search the acoustical study between the two. Round backs take all that carving so I would venture they are much more labor intensive.
I have read that flatbacks experience more problems late in life due primarily to the way they have to be braced. The sound study from Germany shows there are differences in sound to microphones and sound analysis software, but to human ears there were not as much difference. There are probably 1,000s of things that influence the sound, primarily the player.
I now own this bass, which was posted for sale in this thread here on TB: http://www.talkbass.com/threads/for...rich-schuster-located-in-south-jersey.962560/ It does not have a flat back, but the back and the rest are plywood - is that unusual? I ask only because this flat-or-round back thing has just appeared for me, and I didn't realize I had a not-round back bass.
Steve, this doesn't make sense. It either has a flat back or a round, swelled back. Looks round to me in the pics. There is nothing unusual about ply basses, round or flat back.
I was somehow under the impression that round backs were a thing one did with carved but not plywood basses - why put the extra labor into a plywood bass, and I also imagine that plywood is harder to bend.
You can lay up plywood in a form and mold it at that time. My cheap Cremona SB-2 has a round plywood back and front.
Here's a nice older thread where many members weigh in on the subject: http://www.talkbass.com/threads/flatback-or-roundback.630676/#post-8723401 . I prefer round backs for the reasons I stated back then.
So far as I know, virtually all plywood basses are round backed. Now I'll go out on a limb and speculate as to the reason, given that both flat and round backs are equally respectable for basses. My guess is that making a round back out of plywood doesn't cost much more since the layers have to be pressed together in either case. And a round plywood back eliminates the need for bracing. Oh, and is this your first descent into the dark side? If so, welcome, and enjoy your new bass!
I was wondering about that. Do they have the same amount of bulge? I can't tell from looking at my Kay, because the belly is certainly not its original shape.
I've never made profile gauges and confirmed but my eye says they're the same - and my eye's very good!
When ordering my Upton plywood bass my choices were the Standard model which has a round back, and the slightly more expensive Bohemian which has a flat back. The nice folks at Upton said that the flat back Bohemian produces a sound closer to a solid wood (carved?) bass. It's also my understanding that flat back basses are a bit more punchy. The bass is being built and will delivered in January.
As for flat backs and bracing. The traditional ladder bracing is problematic since the wood of the braces is 90 degrees to the back/top plate wood. This wood orientation traps the seasonal movement of the back, eventually leading to some type of failure either in the glue, ribs or back center seam. Maybe a luthier will chime in w/more detail about this. An older bass experiences less seasonal wood movement and may be more stable. There are other types of bracing currently used for FBs, some call it propeller bracing or diagonal bracing, try doing a TB search, you'll find pictures.
Indeed, it would be good for luthiers to chime in. I'm not sure how much more seasonal movement goes on in newer basses if they are constructed of properly dried wood. Also, any movement is greatly reduced when we're talking about a ply back. Indeed, there are alternatives to the older forms of bracing and I believe that Upton uses more modern methods. Finally, while I trust Upton's description of the differences in sonic qualities across their own roundback and flatback basses, reading the comprehensive discussions here suggests that one cannot necessarily validly generalize.
"Compression set" is a term used to describe the action of how wood will expand and contract to relatively the same dimensions, if the wood is trapped it will not return to it's original width as in "compressed and set". I think this also happens with older wood, it may loose its' ability to expand/contract to a large degree