Apparently not. You might do a little research. He has a history of making insensitive and offensive comments. All messages are context dependent if they’re going to be understood above the most superficial level. His comment neatly mistepresents (i.e. consciously or subconsciously lies) about the reality on the ground, distorts what actually occurred, ignores the background event and the long history of events that led up to the incidents, and by inference seeks to reassign blame when it’s already been established by the arrests made who was behind the bulk of the looting and violent acts. You can make anything (e.g. freedom, faith, patriotism, “necessary sacrifice,” responsibility, etc.) sound good at face value. Just pick an innocuous word or phrase and make it mean something completely different from its common understanding. Nothing wrong with keeping and open mind and initially taking something at face value. But after you do, do a little research and fact checking. And then do some thinking of your own.