Has anybody ever put together an "Equal Tension" string set?

This is a frequent topic of conversation at extendedrangebassist.com

Getting an equal tension set over 7+ strings can be quite challenging.

There are a number of different schools of thought on this...what feels best? what sounds best?

A lot of it comes down to your own personal tastes and playing style.

 

Do they have equal flexibility?

 

Ritter did the opposite. Their strings are tensioned to be looser on the highs, so that the string vibrates more to be more equal in volume to the larger strings.

http://www.ritter-basses.com/ritter-basses-info/ritter-basses-strings.htm

P.

 

how do you calculate string tension? I always wondered why string companies didn't make thicker high strings and thinner low strings to make string tension equal

 

sounds good to me...I wonder if it'll sound good to you (when you hear it)

 

I agree with this concept, actually...lower notes have a longer node of vibration and as a result, the amplitude would be larger under the same tension...

when it comes to string vibrations, amplitude = volume.

hence, given equal tension, the lower the note the more amplitude...this doesn't necessarily = more perceived volume, however as it takes more sound energy to generate the same amount of sound pressure (air movement) and hence, perceived volume.

 

Where on the D'Addario website did you get these tension measurements? Also, .130 seems way too thick. your thickness goes up by increments of .15 , but then jumps .35 . I would like to know what the specific tension on each string is.

 

I can't think of a bigger exercise in futility than trying to match tensions. First off, you'll pay much more than just buying a full set. Second, in my humble opinion (apparently you have to add that when you're stating your opinion or people on here will bite your head off because they can't tell just from the statement that it's an opinion), I think diameter makes a much greater difference than tension. I would freak out if I had to jump from a .095 to a .130.

 

Easy with the eye-rolling. Because this is exactly backwards. You would have to make thicker low strings and thinner high strings to equalize tension. Generally, G strings tend to be the highest-tension in the set. And here are all kinds of people complaining about differences in gauge feeling wrong.

 

DA XLs 34" scale are as follows:

45-G-42.8 lbs.
65-D-51.3 lbs.
85-A-48.4 lbs.
105-E-40.3 lbs.
130-B-34.5 lbs.

The interesting thing on the G string is a drop to a 40 drops the tension to 33.7 lbs. The resolution of G string tension is pretty coarse with the standard gauges.

IME I prefer a 45-65-80 (42.8) -100 (36.5) -130 set for a more even feel. The 85 and 105 A and E are noticably harder to play for me. Not sure if it's the thickness or the tension. I also do not like 40 (33.7) and 60 (42.9) G and D strings. They seem "anemic" and difficult to set up without a lot of buzzing. So IME, I would say I prefer lower tension on the thicker strings but YMMV. I have contemplated a custom set of 45-60-80-105 but have never spent the money.

Dave

 

I suppose you're right about that, and I guess it IS in the name of science.