Intonation practices

Discussion in 'Double Bass Pedagogy [DB]' started by Chris Fitzgerald, Jun 26, 2019.

  1. Chris Fitzgerald

    Chris Fitzgerald Student of Life Staff Member Administrator Gold Supporting Member

    Oct 19, 2000
    Louisville, KY
    Doing some research on intonation philosophy/practices of orchestral players as as I prepare for a presentation on intonation for instruments playing with tempered instruments. Any and all input or resources welcome. At ISB I heard a lot of talk in presentations about things like "Always play the leading tone a little high" or "intonate your major 3rds this way in a string section", etc. I am interested in compiling a list of such pedagogical mantras regarding standard teaching of orchestral string players.

    This article represents the kind thinking I am hoping to research, but I would like to hear specific experiential stories from orchestral players if possible. Thanks!
     
  2. Steve Freides

    Steve Freides Former Mannes College Theory Faculty Supporting Member

    Dec 11, 2007
    Ridgewood, NJ
    By this, do you mean instruments like the double bass (and just about every other instrument in the orchestra), which can vary their intonation, playing with instruments whose intonation is fixed like pianos and guitars?

    -S-
     
  3. kinnon64

    kinnon64

    Jun 9, 2009
    "How Equal Temperament Ruined Harmony (and Why You Should Care)" by Ross W. Duffin has been an invaluable resource for me. Not only is it a good read, but it has seriously altered my concept of intonation
     
    oldNewbie and Chris Fitzgerald like this.
  4. Chris Fitzgerald

    Chris Fitzgerald Student of Life Staff Member Administrator Gold Supporting Member

    Oct 19, 2000
    Louisville, KY
    Yes. I have an intonation concept of my own that I want to talk about, but I want to research what the standard practices of orchestral musicians might be in their various forms, both when they are playing in an orchestral or chamber music setting where intonation is controlled by the musicians in real time, and if it changes and how when they are playing with tempered instruments like piano and guitar. I hear a lot of different disconnected things and theories just by being around people at different times, and would like to collect some information to put it all in one place for consideration.

    I will check out the resource that @kinnon64 listed above, although I may need to request it via interlibrary loan to do so. One book that I have found fascinating in many ways is "Harmonic Experience" by W. A. Mathieu. One interesting observation is that my experience of intonation in real time matches the import of the story in the article I linked above, but I get to it in a totally different way.
     
  5. Steve Freides

    Steve Freides Former Mannes College Theory Faculty Supporting Member

    Dec 11, 2007
    Ridgewood, NJ
    @Chris Fitzgerald, I've had this conversation with fellow brass player. (I'm an amateur French Horn and trumpet player.) Every conversation ends up with, "I just try to listen and play in tune." I have yet to hear a strategy or plan. I'll offer that this is what I do, too, just try to play a note that sounds right.

    We all bring different things to our playing. In my case, in college I could tell you, out of the blue, whether the A you were playing was 440 or 441. And in my case, I quickly came to realize that listening to pitch with that level of "detail" - for lack of a better word - was the proverbial rabbit hole from which I might never escape if I ventured in, so I try not to do that. I am convinced that not only intonation but all manners of pitch perception are best viewed as language - if you speak the language fluently, then that's that, and what makes sense is largely a matter of well-honed habit, and there are really no absolutes to be had. So, for me, I don't make a conscious differentiation when playing with a piano, I still just "try to play in tune" as best I'm able and what's happening in my brain to make that happen remains something of a mystery I don't really want to solve.

    The best drill I'm aware of for making people aware of this sort of "pitch detail" - again, for lack of a better way to describe it - is to have two people, or two groups of people, start a half-step from each other and gradually trade places. Depending on skill level, even just saying "Ok, you people sing Ab, and you people sing G, and when I say switch, you switch" can be difficult to impossible. But if it's not, then you start adding time - switch over the course of a 4 beats at quarter = 60. When you get the hang of it, you hear the beats as the two parts relate to each other in various ways, and it's _way_ cool. But I'm not sure that it really accomplishes anything for me, and I can't say for sure that it actually accomplishes anything for anyone.

    For anyone wishing to try this on their own, just put on a drone of some note, and then sing along with it, starting a half-step away and trying to approach the drone pitch gradually.

    NB: The people you live with will absolutely hate you for doing this - it's completely annoying to listen to.

    Just my opinion.

    -S-
     
    BlueP, Cheez and Chris Fitzgerald like this.
  6. Chris Fitzgerald

    Chris Fitzgerald Student of Life Staff Member Administrator Gold Supporting Member

    Oct 19, 2000
    Louisville, KY
    Agree and I don't think I'm likely to change my approach of "listening and trying to play in tune", any time soon. But as an educator, I also have to have strategies for trying to help students who are not playing/singing in tune improve what they are doing. As an example, I've been teaching theory for over 20 years now at the collegiate level, and if I had a nickel for every time some student who can't sing within 5-10 cents of a unison consistently is telling me about how their teacher or ensemble director is telling them about trying to adhere to some pure or other tuning system (and using that as an excuse for not being able to sing in tune during their theory audits!), I could have retired years ago.

    We have several "intonation scholars/obsessives" on our faculty, and I will surely consult with them this semester as part of my research. But in the end, I always fall back on what I call the "sweet spot" as regards intonation. This can be reduced to "when playing your sound against any existing sound made by someone else, position your sound so that is has the least possible amount of beating in relation to/against the other sound". This has always felt right to me and I'm sure I'll continue it as a practice, but I'm hoping to better understand what that system actually means in scientific practice...if not in tremendous detail, then at least better than I understand it now.
     
  7. the_Ryan

    the_Ryan

    Jul 10, 2015
    Boise, ID
    Did you happen to catch Scott Dixon’s presentation at ISB? He talked a LOT about this and his conclusions and solutions revolved around the ideas that since all the orchestral string instruments share GDA strings, those are the resonances and harmonics we should tune to and that the byproduct of this is that sharps are flat, flats are sharp, and some notes (Ab, C, E, and G#) have different versions of in tune depending on the harmonic context.

    I’d love to get into further details, but it’s hard for me to articulate this via text and if you email Scott he could probably send you his PowerPoint and go into much more detail than I can.
     
    Chris Fitzgerald likes this.
  8. the_Ryan

    the_Ryan

    Jul 10, 2015
    Boise, ID
    Big caveat: if you’re playing with piano, guitar, etc. you pretty much have to play using equal temperament since those are fixed-pitch instruments.
     
    Chris Fitzgerald likes this.
  9. Chris Fitzgerald

    Chris Fitzgerald Student of Life Staff Member Administrator Gold Supporting Member

    Oct 19, 2000
    Louisville, KY
    @the_Ryan I didn't catch that presentation unfortunately, but it sounds super relevant and interesting. I'll try to see if I can reach out. I did catch one science based research presentation, but it focused on the physical aspects of intonation and very much downplayed the aspect of pre-hearing. It was interesting, but not of a lot of use to my project.
     
  10. Steve Freides

    Steve Freides Former Mannes College Theory Faculty Supporting Member

    Dec 11, 2007
    Ridgewood, NJ
    You have my deepest sympathy - poor intonation because of a tuning system! Last time I looked a unison is a unison is a unison in all tuning system.

    FWIW, my 'solution' for people who can't match pitch is singing - I have them sing on the names of the notes.

    BTW, FWIW, and all that, my wife and I shared a student for a while, her voice student and my bass student. When she added bass to her studies, her singing intonation improved, so I guess it works both ways.

    -S-
     
    Chris Fitzgerald likes this.
  11. CayGee

    CayGee

    Feb 21, 2018
    Massachusetts
    fascinating stuff!!
     
  12. CaseyVancouver

    CaseyVancouver

    Nov 4, 2012
    CD7C5071-FC0A-4B1C-8C2D-20E4E4979A0F.jpeg E1086AE6-0630-4806-A668-4A7CD2CAF7DE.jpeg 24D9A745-2410-4F77-9C2D-4DA87E9F4A6D.jpeg
    This article may be of interest to you.

    Note: ‘Casals did not believe in modifying to fit the intonation of a piano when playing sonatas. A much more vital partnership exists between the two instruments when the stringed instrument plays as is right for the music, even though this sometimes means that they are playing the same note at different pitches. Importantly, he felt it necessary to tune his A slightly sharp for work with a keyboard.’
     
  13. peteswanson91

    peteswanson91 Supporting Member

    Sep 22, 2004
    Brooklyn, NY
    You may find the book “cello-mind” of interest. It speaks quite a bit on intonation and a systematized way about it. An incredibly useful reference for intonation and technique
     
    Chris Fitzgerald likes this.
  14. Chris Fitzgerald

    Chris Fitzgerald Student of Life Staff Member Administrator Gold Supporting Member

    Oct 19, 2000
    Louisville, KY
    @CaseyVancouver that was an enjoyable read, thanks!

    This speaks to what I generally hear of as something approaching the "norm".
    Indeed! And when anyone trots out this old chestnut, they get the predictable response...

    [​IMG]

    Agree. I have them sing directly into the speaker cone playing a loud drone and listen for the waves of dissension, then work with them on how to calm them.

    The kind of thing Casals is talking about is light years beyond the capability of most people.

    Regarding tuning, for instance, the excursion of the string needs to be taken into account. For pizzicato players, the attack will always be sharper than the decay. The beginning of the art is to understand what part of the note envelope needs to be tuned. For arco players, excursion is still a factor, but in a different and more variable way.
     
  15. Michael Glynn

    Michael Glynn

    Feb 25, 2004
    Seattle
    CaseyVancouver likes this.
  16. Steve Freides

    Steve Freides Former Mannes College Theory Faculty Supporting Member

    Dec 11, 2007
    Ridgewood, NJ
    Yes. It's light-years beyond anything I've given thought to, but I'm going to read and reread that article and start thinking about this.

    -S-
     
  17. the_Ryan

    the_Ryan

    Jul 10, 2015
    Boise, ID
    While I do believe intonation can and should be modified for affect/mood, my personal opinion is that our ears and hands should be attuned to pure and equal tempered intervals because I believe that we should strive for blend and resonance first and foremost; Casals’ expressive intonation can do powerful things to shape a melody, but goes against the harmonic series and nature/physics in terms of the spacing of intervals, of which I believe the latter is of most importance to bass players since we provide harmonic context for the rest of the ensemble. If we’re a soloist I think that we can think more expressively about our intonation, but most of the time we are accompanists trying to make everyone else sound better.

    Again, just my thoughts on the matter.
     
  18. Chris Fitzgerald

    Chris Fitzgerald Student of Life Staff Member Administrator Gold Supporting Member

    Oct 19, 2000
    Louisville, KY
    Agree, although I am interested to discover how the physics behind pure intonation interfaces with the concept of "sweet spot intonation" I alluded to earlier. This is really the gist of what I am hoping to discover with this research. In the end, I don't give a flip about the numbers in the same way I don't give a flip about grammar and syntax while in the process of speaking and writing; these are things to be learned and ingrained so that 99% of the time they happen at a subconscious level and we don't have to "think" about them because we are already too busy being them. It's Alan Watts' "The Finger and the Moon" all over again:

    Full essay here.
     
  19. Chris Fitzgerald

    Chris Fitzgerald Student of Life Staff Member Administrator Gold Supporting Member

    Oct 19, 2000
    Louisville, KY
    Reading the above, someone will inevitably note that I am looking for information about the "Finger pointing at the truth about intonation", which would be accurate. However, in eventual actual practice, we gesture to the philosophy and science behind that pointing finger with a different finger entirely - at which point, we simply play.
     
  20. Steve Freides

    Steve Freides Former Mannes College Theory Faculty Supporting Member

    Dec 11, 2007
    Ridgewood, NJ
    All tuning is a compromise. By itself, I can't agree with the above. I think the physics of the thing is important to understand but it is not a reason _not_ to experiment with intonation.

    That's a separate discussion. In an ensemble with a keyboard, or even a guitar, I don't know that we can say we provide "harmonic context" nor I do really know what that means.

    -S-