It's all about looks...

I like No. 1 but they both look great.

 

I agree, #1 looks the best but as Kris said, they both look great.

 

I like #1 as well. #2 reminds me of a warrior.

 

They're both nice but I think #1 looks a bit more stock. #2 is more original. I would go with 2.

 

I like #2. I like the shape of the lower bout if that's what it's called.
I think the combo of the lower bout on #2 and the cut of the upper non cut away section would be cool. I hope that makes sense.

 

I like the single cut design of the first one but I also like the body design of the second one....combine the two...keep the single cut design in the first pic and combine it with the body of the second pic...lolol they're both awesome though..

 

the back end of # 2 and the front of #1

 

My thoughts exactly. I like SC's where the upper 'horn' meets the neck at a perpendicular angle without 'curving up the neck'. I also like the lower body design of #2...

 

I like 2.

 

+ 1

 

I'm really digging option 3.

 

#1

 

I don't know, you tell me. Here's a side by side. I think your option #3 has smoother lines.

 

judging by those nice sketches, you would probably know better than i would, but the second body shape looks like it would balance better with the even distribution of the weight for the body? just a thought...but i guess you could always compensate for that in your headstock design. good luck!

 

Both are nice but to me the scooped bottom is starting to be over used, so I vote for #1.

 

For looks alone, I picked 1. It looks smoother while #2 looks kinda "blobby" to me.

 

i think number 2 would fit better with the novax fretboard (supposing your bridge is not straight, hence à la dingwall)