Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Miscellaneous [BG]' started by Stinsok, Aug 5, 2012.
That would kinda suck:
Maybe they could call it the G. Jeils Band
They're in it just for the music, right? This is toooo funny!
Just replace J Geils and band with yoko and the plastics and there's your answer.
Also seems like Geils wants to be paid [litigious] without having to show up .
The Band Formerly Known As The J. Geils Band, or the J. Geils Sucks Band.
Well, it makes perfect sense to me. It's his own name, for crying out loud. Though I do think it would be easy enough for them to do a tour advertised as "The Music of the J. Geils Band..."
The Band That WAS the J.Geils Band only Without J.Geils.
...it's like if the Marshall Tucker Band were to tour without Marshall Tucker!
Yep. To make it a bit more rhythmically concise, how about the "Sans J.Geils Band"? I dig these guys, but how much money are they really making, anyway?
Boneheads. They just reunited in 2010 without incident. They should just settle their differences long enough to do another nostalgia tour like every other classic rock band.
Dumb idea on Peter Wolf's part to try and tour and use the founder's name without including him or securing his permission.
How bout The Gay Child's Band?
The J Giels Hasbands
Or if Pink Floyd went on tour and left Pink at home!
The Jay Gyles Band? That way it sounds the same but they can claim they are naming it after a fictional character.
So I wonder, did the family of Jethro Tull ever try to slap a law suit on Ian Anderson for using his name without permission?
Wait, wut? Mr. Salwitz?
edit: Ah... apparently "Mr. Dick" is not his legal name.
Hey, whatever happened to Stephen Jo Bladd?
By, the way, which one's Pink?
They fired one of the best frontmen ever when they finally hit it big in the early 80's, so they have a history of some really bad moves.
you got to give it to me...
Great band..wish they could fix this and tour together again.