Jazz copies with blank headstock

With blank headstocks how can anyone have a clue which basses you are talking about. Did you happen to get an brand name for this nameless bass?

 

I own an SX Jazz which I believe is a good bass for the $100 I paid for it. It isn't as good as my USACG bass, but it didn't cost me $800 either. I've always believed that a bass is just like any other tool. If a musician likes the feel and sound of an instrument, it is a good instrument regardless of the name (or lack thereof) on the headstock. In the end, only you will know if one of these basses is right for you.

 

Could've been replacement necks, or have the headstocks sanded because they were stolen.

 

Could be a warmoth parts bass, they don't put anything on their headstocks. Not very likely. I think tplyons is more likely to be right.

 

there were quite a few of these on ebay UK last year being sold by a seller called tech-mate

heres a lefty thats on the go just now



i got the candy red/matching headstock P version for the start of my oldschool fretted P project

pretty good value really

bit heavy and the electronics are pants

i put my customary dimarzio dp122 into it and strung it with chromes and fitted my usual metal thumbrest over the end of the neck

then i stripped the overly tinted finish off the back of the neck and got a custom decal made for it - "Froover PeeBass"

i dont play much fretted but when im in the mood for some 60s soul tones it comes up with the goods

for about £100 theyre great beater basses once youve tweaked them a little

cheers
Lucy

 

Or just because vanity. I´ve met couple of guys who sanded their headstocks because the didn´t want people to know how cheap their guitar/bass was.

 

SX are called Jim Deacon in the UK