MATH VS. MUSIC

Whatever math there is to be found in music can be boiled down to very simple arithmetics, with fractions as the most advanced topic. Math is so much more than that. So is music, but in a completely different way.

Mathematical talent and musical talent are in my eyes totally unrelated.

 

I think one helps inform. There's a good deal of math in musical theory and a lot of modern composers used mathematical formulas to create music (avant garde music, that is). Though I agree with Oysterman that you don't need to be good at one in order to be good at the other, nor that excelling in one means you will excel at the other (though studies show that musical kids do better in school).

 

Anyone should be able to cope with such basic math whether or not they have talent for it. It's not Fermat's Last Theorem or anything. I doubt the little math involved is enough to prevent anyone from learning music. I also doubt that knowing math gives you some kind of head start.

That's different. I could choose notes with a 12-sided die to make music. Does that make it statistics? Or a deck of cards. Does that make it poker?

 

Can you count to 4? or maybe 6 for those trickies 3/6s

 

to really understand something, i have to comprehend the theory behind it, so in that sense my musical understanding (which i stopped a few years ago) and mathematical understanding are similar.



but what i consider "real math" (high math, the stuff beyond the calcs and other computational courses) has little in common with music and more in common with puzzles.

and, ironically, i kind of suck at puzzles but am pretty dang good at high math.

 

I suck at math, can't read music, know very little theory. But I can feel music, hear music, I want to play a note...I move my finger to the fret and play it. Sure I know where notes, octives, some scales stuff like that. But I rely on my feel when I play. Granted I am no vertuoso, and can't improvise very well or play jazz. But in the pocket to a rock or blues tune I'm all groove.

 

I'm a bit of a hybrid. Good at math and math-based sciences, and also a musician. I can't say that I've ever really connected the two, but I don't find them to be mutually exclusive.

 

that'd be really funny if you also "felt" math that way.


actually, in seriousness, lots of math does seem like you are "feeling" the solution, when you suddenly know what to do.


anyway, stay in school, drink your milk, etc. etc.

 

Plenty of math in accoustic physics.

Other than that I can count to thirteen....

 

I played drums for years before bass..If I just picked up the bass without my drumming background I couldn't do it. I learned bassakwards and am still trying to learn the right way more and more..but I love jamming and having fun, and i am ok for playing by ear and off tab. I have been only playing for 4 years..I tell some people that and they don't believe me.

 

All the good players in my music class happened to be in the enriched math class as well. I think it's just that the people who work hard in one thing are the same people who work hard at something else. This only works for school and maybe work, I don't think it works for skill and talent in music.

 

Yes. I think it's a fallacy that music helps kids learn. Music students perform well in other subjects because they're smarter than average to begin with. If they weren't, they'd be wasting their time doing other things, like posting on internet forums.

 

Math vs. Music?

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Math&word2=Music

 

Math + Music = Mathmetal. Whoop.

 

say it ain't so!


anyway, i read that one study found that listening to mozart, et al, improves spacial reasoning (and maybe only temporarily? i read it over four years ago, after all!).

 

It's all about patterns. For example, consider a Slinky, then consider Charlie Parker.

 

Well here's a troublesome thing, I'm recognized by all of the computer teachers in my school as being able to code beyond grade 12 level. However, I'm barely getting 70's in Math. To make matters even worse, you have to who knows how many math credits to be able to pursure a career in Computers. I've also been told I have that the left side of my brain is the stronger one, the one that's responsible for math and logic, yet, as I said before, am horrible in math. I think all these people are lying to me.

 

There's a grade 12 level for coding now?

I happened to spend waaaaaaaay too much time with the comp sci department while I was in university (not necessarily by choice), and I was always shocked (coming from an advanced tech background) at how little math the comp sci kids actually knew. Only the basic stuff was required for their program, and many of them had to try a few times to get a passing grade. That being said, if I had a dollar for every person with an engineering degree who failed at least one math course, I wouldn't be workin' for the guv'mint right now.

Just a warning, things might get convoluted at this point. I'm sure I had some neat things to say, but who knows how they'll work out.

I spent my university years taking (and working with) very high level academics. One of the most surprizing things I found was that the group I spent my time with (a fairly dense population of incredibly high IQs with a few slackers like me thrown in to keep people on their toes) had very few of the classic nerd characteristics. Many of these kids excelled at music and sports as well as all kinds of academics. The ones who would be called nerds by the rest of the world tended to be the middle of the road students, while the ones on top tended to be good at everything they did.

Interestingly enough, a psychology class I took once mentioned the same trend in society at large. If you break people down into groups by IQ, you find some interesting things (disclaimer, the numbers come from a memory blurred by any number of abuses (mostly substance based), so use them a guide, not the hard truth). The average group (around 100) tend to be just that, average. They have specific skills, and can be really good at some things, but if you take everything across the board they'll come out to about the middle of the pack (by everything I'm referring to academics, social interaction, and athletics). The next group would be considered to have well above average IQs (say 130-180). These tend to be your classic nerds, amazing at analytical thinking, academics, and what have you. On the other hand, they also tend to struggle with social situations and athletics. When you go beyond this group (IQs of 180 and up) you find that people tend to be successful at just about everything. Top marks in academics, high level athletes, and excellent at social interactions.

Of course there are exceptions in every group, this is just a basic "trend" that my psychology text mentioned (and I've never been much good at trusting "trends" in psychology). I wonder, though, if this might have something to do with the connection between maths and music. Maybe the kids who excel at both of these things just tend to excel at everything? Or maybe they're like me and they can get by in an advanced tech program and muddle their way through music with nothing more than a healthy dose of luck and a laid back attitude.

-Nate

 

"Music is math" - Boards of Canada
http://www.warprecords.com/mart/music/release.php?cat=WARP101#