1. Please take 30 seconds to register your free account to remove most ads, post topics, make friends, earn reward points at our store, and more!  
    TalkBass.com has been uniting the low end since 1998.  Join us! :)

Metallica Vs Metallica

Discussion in 'Off Topic [BG]' started by Stupidnick, Jan 18, 2003.

  1. Stupidnick


    Mar 22, 2002
    ...my room...
    Against its record label, MP3 swappers and even a French perfume company, the monster metal band Metallica has been involved in many controversial legal battles.
    Now its sights are aimed at the Edmonton punk band called ... Metallica.

    The California former heavy metal group sent a letter to the local Metallica through a lawyer at the Los Angeles-based firm of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, promising serious action if the Alberta band doesn't change its name by Friday.

    "Your use of Metallica is particularly astonishing to the band, given that you have admitted in at least one interview that 'you know you are not allowed to use the name,' " wrote lawyer Jill M. Pietrini, in an e-mail to bass player and singer Blair William Piggott.

    Pietrini is a familiar name to anyone who followed the real Metallica's tug of war with Napster and its users. Many fans worldwide reacted negatively.

    Piggott denies the name has any immediate causal connection to the Napster incidents, though agrees it's another way the band has lost connection to its fans.

    While talking to their lawyer about passing a CD along to the first Metallica, Piggott says he was told it was against Metallica's corporate policy to accept "unsolicited material."

    "I said, 'What are you talking about, you're suing us?' There's solicitation. They were once really in touch with the sexual frustration of the pimply high school kid.

    "Now you can't even get them to listen to your music!"

    Rumour has it that Metallica's past litigious behaviour spurred on local musicians Piggott and Joey Caliente to choose the name, a joke meant as a publicity stunt.

    But the California band is stern in response.

    "Metallica could recover significant monetary damages and obtain an injunction against any further acts of infringement, both in the U.S. and in Canada," the letter, sent out in an e-mail from Piggott, says.

    Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, meanwhile, did not comment before deadline.

    "We'll get back to you," a spokesman said from L.A.

    Great now.. James and lars will sue every parent who named there kids james or lars.....
    this is sad!
  2. it seems its mainly only Ulrich running around sueing people. i still like Metallica's music(the metal band), but i dont see a point to sueing Napster, and a paint company, and everyone else whos been sued. after 20 years of being a signed band, who's name is well known, i'd think they'd already have have too much money to deal with. but, maybe they just like legal action..
  3. hahaha.

    also, what a bunch of losers.
  4. Stupidnick


    Mar 22, 2002
    ...my room...
    They just had to put former in the press release huh?? No wonder its taken so long, i bet nobody wants to work with an ******* like lars anyway.

    Metallica is hyped more than blink 182. They share something in common, They used to be great bands. What happened!??:mad:
  5. i think cliff was the heart of the great speed metal that was metallica, ...And Justice For All is a great CD, but i think that was the extent of hammets and hetfields metal writing. its just got softer from there. i still like the black album, load, and reload, its just not the same as the first 4..
  6. PollyBass

    PollyBass ******

    Jun 25, 2001
    Shreveport, LA

Share This Page