1. Please take 30 seconds to register your free account to remove most ads, post topics, make friends, earn reward points at our store, and more!  

MF 101 Vs Q-Tron

Discussion in 'Effects [BG]' started by rnilson, Sep 17, 2008.


  1. rnilson

    rnilson

    Mar 8, 2008
    Kansas City, MO
    I am getting a new EV Filter. It is down to Moogerfooger LPF and Q-Tron. How do they compare?
    I will be running fuzz and octave down with it mainly. I do electronic, DnB type music.
    Thanks.
     
  2. bongomania

    bongomania Commercial User

    Oct 17, 2005
    PDX, OR
    owner, OVNIFX and OVNILabs
    Moog = more versatile and more controllable, but also bigger, requiring a special power supply, and with a poorer bypass.

    Tonally they are "different but equal"
     
  3. Jared Lash

    Jared Lash Born under punches

    Aug 21, 2006
    Denver, CO
    For what you want to do, I think the Moogerfooger suits your needs a lot better.
     
  4. Joe Gress

    Joe Gress

    Dec 22, 2005
    Pueblo, CO
    From what I have heard and have played (the Qtron+), the moog is a bit more for the DnB type sound as it will dominate on the low end. If you looking for more of a funky mutron-squelchy type sound, the Qtron is better.
     
  5. Ely

    Ely

    Jun 8, 2001
    Huntsville, AL
    The Moog is definitely more of a synth filter, while the Q-Tron is more of a funk filter.
     
  6. TheMutt

    TheMutt Guest

    Apr 28, 2007
    The Moog is definitely more versatile, but don't forget that there's also a QTron+ with which you could add a fuzz pedal into the loop so as not to mess up the envelope of the filter, but keep the fuzziness. :D
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.