New cabs for my old GK 1001RB-II... thinking of going Neo

Discussion in 'Amps and Cabs [BG]' started by Lebowsky, Dec 28, 2014.

  1. Lebowsky

    Lebowsky Effects Forum Resident Supporting Member

    Mar 18, 2007
    Switzerland
    So I have been playing a 1001RB-II into a 115RBH + 210RBH for years and am happy with it soundwise. However I have been thinking of changing cabs recently, and all the threads I've read in the last months about not using matching cabs and getting phase issues, etc... have pushed me in that direction as well.

    I have been contemplating either a 2x115 or 2x212 setup from the Neo cabs. I know I could get another 115RBH, but those things are just too heavy nowadays...

    I wanted your opinion on both cab combinations. I play heavy rock with tons of lows (think Young Widows / Russian Circles / etc), and not always have PA support.

    What combination will get me the most articulate sound, be the most bass heavy and move the most air?

    ps: a single 810 or 412 might be awesome, but unfortunately I don't think we wouldn't be able to fit in our cars...
     
  2. Mystic Michael

    Mystic Michael Hip No Ties

    Apr 1, 2004
    New York, NY
    If the choice is between a pair of GK Neo 115-III and a pair of GK Neo 212-II, the pair of 2x12 is the way to go. For one thing, GK's Neo 1x12 and 2x12 cabs are voiced deeper and are more balanced than their Neo 1x15 cabs, which are more midrange-intensive than the 1x12 and 2x12. For another thing, the 2x12 will definitely push more air than the 1x15.

    If the choice is between these two models, the better choice is easy: the pair of Neo 212 cabs.

    MM
     
    B-string and Tunaman like this.
  3. 4Mal

    4Mal Gold Supporting Member

    Jun 2, 2002
    Columbia River Gorge
    A 1212/6 or 12/6 and 12/sub if you want modular would be killer...
    My 'high volume' rig is an MB2-500 or MB-Fusion into a 12/6 sometimes I add the sub, mostly it stays in the truck... It is extremely versatile and cranks the volume like nobody's business.
     
  4. Lebowsky

    Lebowsky Effects Forum Resident Supporting Member

    Mar 18, 2007
    Switzerland
    Thanks. You sound like this is overly restrictive though, and that it might not be your choice if you were in my place. If I wasn't restricted to specific models/brands, what would you go for?

    To use a sub, you'd need a crossover to send only the lowest frequencies to it, no? Or how do you do it?
     
  5. Mystic Michael

    Mystic Michael Hip No Ties

    Apr 1, 2004
    New York, NY
    Well look, we've each got to find a way to narrow down our options to a reasonable number, while not arbitrarily ignoring viable alternatives. All I'm saying is that since you presumably like the GK sound, as you've been using GK gear, the dual Neo 2x12 is a very reasonable way to get to where you want to go, and better than the 115RBH + 210RBH, in my opinion. They're relatively inexpensive, lightweight, and they allow you to make use of the separate horn channel on the 1001RB-II. Not a thing wrong with it.

    As for my personal choice for a hard rock / heavy rock band - and assuming that weight and cost are not limiting factors (which would be a big assumption) - I'd likely go for a big Mesa rig; probably a Titan V12 or Big Block 750 head with a pair of Powerhouse 2x12 cabs. Or since you're in Europe, a roughly equivalent Tecamp rig would also be an excellent choice (Tecamp is sort of the European Mesa, as I see it).

    But I'm not you, nor am I in your place. At the end of the day, while the performance characteristics of these various rigs can be measured and compared, the ultimate choice is always a very personal one, and is typically driven by one's own intuition and subjective comfort factor, at least as much as it is driven by the objective specifications data.

    If I'm not mistaken, Mal is probably referring to his nEARful or fEARful rig, which AFAIK is intended to be operated full range. The 12/6 cab includes a midrange attenuator, so to use it with the 12 sub, one would simply deattenuate the mid-driver on the 12/6 to run it @ 100%, and thereby achieve an optimum tonal balance between lows and mids across both cabs.

    MM
     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2014
  6. orangejulius3

    orangejulius3 Supporting Member

    May 6, 2013
    La Habra CA
    I have a GK NEO 412 cab paired with my GK 2001RB!

    Luckily I have a truck to carry my gear around. The 412 is one easy cab to move around since it acts like a dolly as well.
    The only time it's a hassle is when there is stairs.

    If I only had a car, 2 of the GK NEO 2x12 would be my choice.
     
    B-string and Tunaman like this.
  7. Mr_Martin

    Mr_Martin

    Jul 31, 2014
    Germany
    GK NEO 2x12 :thumbsup:
     
  8. 4Mal

    4Mal Gold Supporting Member

    Jun 2, 2002
    Columbia River Gorge
    Yep. fEarful rig. In my case I used the original CBG x-over plus a 6 db pad on the mids, no tweet. I also use the cheaper, less sensitive Eminence alpha-lite mid. No tweet. The top end is reminiscent of my old Ampeg fridge. The lows kill. I don't actually use the LPF on the sub. I just run it full range. The 12 is supposedly have some anomalies at the very top of it's range but frankly I've never heard them as I only run that sub with the 12.6 cab and the mid driver just buries the 12 in the potentially offensive range.

    Note: I was never after a 'flat' studio monitor sort of approach with my rig. I want some color and that color is somewhat darker than what most of the fEarful crowd was looking for. I like the GK 'native' sound. I push the high's a bit, I cut the upper mid's a bit, room depending, I might cut or boost low mids or the bass.

    Basses wise I typically run a Lakland 55-01 or Reverend Rumblefish PJ, both strung with light Chrome flats with that rig. For my uses it is darned near perfect. It really present the things I love about GK shine. And it's pretty small. I may change the cabs up to a 1212/6 this winter. I have a second small rig that I use in stage monitor only scenarios. That one is also custom and is based on the Eminence 2510-II . Again, no tweet. I really like the upper mids presence of a bare cone driver.

    Last thing... I'm almost always in the PA. I send a DI line from my pedal board. My amp on stage is a monitor for me, the drummer and anyone else close enough to hear it. It is pretty rare when I have to carry the room from stage. The fEarful rig will do it in a pretty large space, I just like the presentation we get from a good mix in the PA... I typically mix from stage and own a small, trying to get bigger sound company. The guy I mixed Saturday night had an SVT, Mesa 4x10, Fender P Deluxe. Radial PRO DI before the head. I didn't even ask, he just handed us the cable. I was happy with how the bass sat in the mix after a few tunes. Lot's of ways to get there...
     
  9. DrDAV14

    DrDAV14 Supporting Member

    Feb 4, 2008
    Denver, Colorado
    I've used both the 212 x 2, and 115 x 2, with the MB Fusion and preferred the 2 115's. Reasonable price and weight for both.
     
  10. Tunaman

    Tunaman

    Dec 26, 2004
    Boston
    I think GK NEO 12s > GK RBH 115 > GK NEO 115s

    My stack of GK NEO 115s go no where though. Small footprint light & filled a church with 1000 people last week... only 1 cab. Perfect match with a streamliner, a bit too aggressive with other amps with NEO 115s I find.
     
    orangejulius3 likes this.
  11. Lebowsky

    Lebowsky Effects Forum Resident Supporting Member

    Mar 18, 2007
    Switzerland
    thanks everybody for the input! It looks like I'm gonna go for 2x212 for the moment.

    Weight and cost is not really an issue for me. It was when I got my current rig though, and this was the max I could afford then. Was my first salary :) And yes, I like the GK sound, and this is why I went with my current rig back then. When I bought it, Neos were only starting to be available in the US, so I would have had to wait 6 months to a year before they'd be available here... and I think several of those cabs even got redesigned to a "mark-II" IIRC.

    Size (for transportation) and availability are an issue though. Availability-wise, Switzerland is very complicated as it's not even in the european union...

    If I were to jump for something else, the only thing that really has me GASing badly is a Verellen Meatsmoke. But it's just GAS talking, I never even tried one.

    Anyway, for the moment I'm pretty happy with my 1001RB-II. It has headroom I'll probably never be using, so I want the best possible cabs I can get with this head, and I thought it would be smart to go with GK cabs and keep taking advantage of the horn bi-amp system. But if something else, easy to obtain from my location, is a consensus on being way better than the GK Neo212's and is a common fit with a 1001RB-II, I'll definitely consider it!

    can I ask you why you preferred the 2x115s to the 2x212 exactly?
     
  12. DrDAV14

    DrDAV14 Supporting Member

    Feb 4, 2008
    Denver, Colorado
    I liked the tone of the mid frequencies better through the 15's. 212's are louder, but you aren't short on headroom with the 1001RB,either will serve you well. A lot of the sound will depend on your bass and your ears, so enjoy the experience.
     
  13. orangejulius3

    orangejulius3 Supporting Member

    May 6, 2013
    La Habra CA
    Switzerland is pretty far from California :D

    Have you checked out EBS?
    They are not comparable by any means.
     
  14. I felt like I got a whole new GK 1001 rb 2 the day I hooked up my first fEarful. I built a 15/6/1 and only put the two way crossover in the cab. I ran the horn right off the GK's high frequency circuit. That gave me the horn control right on the amp face, which is how GK does their biamp cabs.

    But, let's face it the horns are all about sizzle, what really sealed the deal for me was the massive steak. A whole new range of lows with full power, tons of mids. All the definition I'd been after for the lowest notes, even tuned down a half step with a five string.

    The fEarful 12/6 is a huge band for the buck in a very small package. Probably not the easiest cab to test in Europe, and I know DIY isn't everybody's cup o tea, but it might be worth looking into.
     
  15. dingwall and rig.jpg I felt like I got a whole new GK 1001 rb 2 the day I hooked up my first fEarful. I built a 15/6/1 and only put the two way crossover in the cab. I ran the horn right off the GK's high frequency circuit. That gave me the horn control right on the amp face, which is how GK does their biamp cabs.

    But, let's face it the horns are all about sizzle, what really sealed the deal for me was the massive steak. A whole new range of lows with full power, tons of mids. All the definition I'd been after for the lowest notes, even tuned down a half step with a five string.

    The fEarful 12/6 is a huge bang for the buck in a very small package. Probably not the easiest cab to test in Europe, and I know DIY isn't everybody's cup o tea, but it might be worth looking into.