New Head

if you go with peavey go with a firebass 700 great heads I love mine

 

All heads you mention would be sweet, it just depends on the tone you're after, and how much you can get one for.

From my experience:

GK400RB = too gutless IMO
GK800RB = good power, punk tone
Ampeg B2R = good power, Ampeg SS tone (I reckon the 800RB is more powerful)

Peavey stuff, while i've never had any real experience with the bass stuff, is pretty good whack for the buck, although their "character" IMO is nothing special.

Being a tubehead, i've gotta say that it'll sound best with a vintage tube head!

 

The GK 800RB would be a very nice setup. I have seen a lot of bands with the Ampeg 8x10 and GK 800RB rig. Sounds good for punk and hard rock! Pretty loud too! Not to mention, those GK heads can be found for pretty cheap.

 

Does the Gallien 800RB have the same tonal options as the Ampeg B2R? As the 800RB only has a 4 band tone control, how does this rate to the B2R's 3 band tone and 9 band graphic? This question relates to punk style.

 

If you're a "true" "punk", then you don't need that 9-band EQ, just more junk to get screwed up in the middle of a gig.
The 800RB (which I adore, along with the 400RB, which has plenty of guts), has some pushbutton voicing filters that offer you low cut, contouring, and high boost in addition to the four band active EQ.
In short, the 800RB has more tonal options than the B-2R.
The B-2R is a very basic amp. This is not saying it's a bad amp, it just sticks with a single general tone, which is already a winner. Although the B-2R is a 350W head, it is more comparable in terms of features to the 400RB-III, which although rated at 240W, has no problem competing with the B-2R, because Ampeg is a little more generous with their specs.

I prefer GK heads, but be forewarned that the Ampeg sound and the GK sound are very different, so be sure to try out both.

 

Personally, I would take a Carvin R1000 over any of the heads mentioned so far. YMMV, of course.

 

I think the GK 800RB still would have better tone than the Carvin. I used to own the R600, great for the money, but I like GK sound better. Of course, this is only in my experience and opinion!

 

The R1000 is a good head too, if you are in need of more power over better tone.

 

I'll just list my 3 favorite heads...


Peavey Firebass 700 II
G-K 700RB
G-K 1001RB
Ampeg b5r


With an 8x10, I suggest something that you can bridge. The 800RB, if I'm correct only pulls 100 watts @ 8 ohms, which is what the 8x10 is (i believe... cold be wrong)

So I don't think the 800 RB would be a good idea to run through that... a 2000RB would work nicely though... 1000 watts bridged... It'd power that 8x10 but good.

 

for not too much money i'd check out the GK 400rb. it'd be plenty loud thru an 8x10. also the peavy firebass, ampeg b2r, and swr workingman's 4004. they all have different tonal characteristics. i'd prefer the GK.

the 800rb has 300 watts (i believe at 4 ohms) for the lows, and 100 watts at 8 ohms for the highs. two amps with a crossover! i don't think you have the option of bridging the amps, though.

 

In all honesty, I believe the Ampeg 8x10's an 8 ohm cab, meaning with the 800RB you can only plug it into the "highs" jack, which would make it only 100 watts.

 

Oh yeah... As I said before... my 3 favorite heads are:

Peavey Firebass II 700
G-K 1001RB
G-K 700RB
Ampeg b5r


In all actuality though...
G-K and Ampeg sound nothing
alike, to make a generlization...

Ampeg's are generally warm.
G-K's are generally EXTREMELY clean.
Peavey's clean, but not like as clean as
a G-K head. It's all about prefrence.

Just go out to a store and try all the head's you're
considering... It's the only way you can get a good opinion on all of them...

By the way... If you decide on a Peavey head, fork out the extra $$$ to get the Firebass... It's worth the extra $50.

 

If you are operatiing the 800RB through full range mode rather than biamp, it runs at 300W @ 4 0hm.

 

No no no, that's not what that means. You can always plug an 8 ohm cab into an amp rated to handle 4 ohms, you just can't always do the reverse.

 

As my dad used to say, that's what makes horse races. I've played tons of 800RBs, and *for what I personally like* none of them were half as good as either of the Carvins I've owned.

Variable mileage indeed. One of the cool things about this forum, when expressed with basic courtesy and respect.

 

And how many watts do you think it would produce? Still 300 when you double the ohms? nope.
Maybe 150 watts. Which wouldn't be anywhere near enough wattage to power an 8x10.

That'd be 18.75 watts per speaker... That's definatly under power it.

 

I love my Ampeg B2R, the sound is great, and I believe any head without an EQ is useless. Plus Ampeg is a great name.

I'm just an Ampeg kinda guy, nothing else comes close.

 

All ampeg 8x10's are 4 ohms. 8, 32 ohm speakers all in parallel. That would give you 300 watts out of the 800RB. I have no experience with any of the other heads mentioned. I've always been suprised by the GK 800 and 400 RB's. Good luck with whatever head you get. You have a great cabinet to start with. Anything sounds pretty good through that.