Passive or Active?

I prefer a passive pickup, but mated with an active pre-amp.

Howevcer of late I have found I tend to try and bypass the on board pre-amp in my basses and just run in passive.

The reason for this is that I prefer to use the amp to do the EQing and just use blend and volume on the bass itself.


As far as Active pickups go, I know EMG makes and I think Bartiloni does too, I am sure there are others, but of the actives I have played, I have not been hugely impressed.

 

used to be a big passive guy, but im moving into the realm of active. getting "in" with the times.

 

I use whatever sounds good.

I have a Lakland Daryl Jones 4 string bass that's all passive, I would never think of making it active.

I also have a Spector 4 string that's all active (EMG pickups AND preamp) and I would never think of making it passive

Active pickups have some benefits over passive - you can have longer cable runs and they're typically quieter than passive pickups. On the downside, if battery goes you're toast.
With passive pickups, obviously you have the benefit of simplicity - no battery to go wrong, and you've got one less thing (no preamp in the pickups) in the signal chain.

I think when people think active pickups they always think of EMG J's, which have a very crisp sound that some people call 'sterile'. Those pickups have a built in eq pre-shape curve, but that's a function of EMG's and not active pickups in and of themselves. Seymour Duncan do some vintage styled active pickups which sounded very natural to my ears.

 

I have owned & played both but, I still much prefer Passive.

George

 

Passive. I don't have to worry about a battery, or unplugging my bass when I don't play. I can't tell the difference between tone, so I don't care.