Renkus for church

Discussion in 'Live Sound [BG]' started by nutdog, Jun 4, 2020.

  1. nutdog

    nutdog when I'm a good dog they sometimes throw me a bone

    Feb 19, 2009
    in the dog house
    We're getting quotes for church sound replacement. We have a Renkus sub. The company is recommending the ICLive X, which is a 2x8 speaker, as a top to handle the entire front of house for ~350 seat sanctuary. We run a full band (v drums, bass, guitars, keys, vocals...) at reasonable volume that doesn't drown out congregational singing.

    No doubt it will sound and look better than the 'speakers in a box' existing system. Current system has many dead spots, lack of clarity. The demo with speaking and canned music sounded great but I'm skeptical about a full band through a 2x8/sub system.

    Anybody have experience with these? ICLive X | Renkus-Heinz

    IMG_3329.JPG IMG_3321.JPG
     
  2. thumbknuckle

    thumbknuckle In Memoriam

    May 23, 2012
    Westfield, MA
    I have not heard that particular box but have mixed many shows on a Renkus Heinz system which I found to be excellent.
     
    nutdog likes this.
  3. nutdog

    nutdog when I'm a good dog they sometimes throw me a bone

    Feb 19, 2009
    in the dog house
    I've played outdoors through a Renkus column system. I know it's good but I'm wondering if this cab is enough for the job.
     
  4. WayneP

    WayneP Supporting Member

    Oct 11, 2004
    Corpus Christi, Texas
    nutdog likes this.
  5. nutdog

    nutdog when I'm a good dog they sometimes throw me a bone

    Feb 19, 2009
    in the dog house
    Yes, all of our eggs in one basket in the ceiling.
     
  6. Wasnex

    Wasnex

    Dec 25, 2011
    Specs say 129dB peak in whole space. That's pretty loud for a church.

    The more important factor will be how dispersion fits the space. 120 degree horizontal dispersion, and I believe vertical dispersion can be varied.
     
  7. 4Mal

    4Mal Gold Supporting Member

    Jun 2, 2002
    Columbia River Gorge
    there are many 2x8" array boxes out there... so the 2x8 format shouldn't be a concern. Dispersion .. yeah. looking at the existing setup, to duplicate that coverage obviously multiple boxes are called for... what is wrong with the current array ? Could the drivers be upgraded, add good dsp and an amp rack ?

    In general, I think a lot of Renkus. I own 6 three way tops and 4 2 way monitors that are Renkus and the stuff is well built. These are passive boxes and I'm running 3rd party DSP with measurements from SMAART.

    Another vendor that impresses the heck out of me is K'Array. The level of innovation there is remarkable. I spent a bunch of time with them at Namm. Pre-Corona, I was considering branching into the install market. They are the folks I would have aligned with. Needless to say, that plan is on hold if not completely kiboshed.
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2020
  8. nutdog

    nutdog when I'm a good dog they sometimes throw me a bone

    Feb 19, 2009
    in the dog house
    I don’t have a problem with Renkus or the 2x8 format, just skeptical that one will do the job. I had a cutting-edge boutique 2x8 bass cab that was nice but had a limit and didn’t live up to the hype.

    The old speakers are from the 80s. They are single drivers (I think 15s) in locally made boxes. I don’t think any calculations went into their design. It has dead spots, uneven dispersion and lack of clarity. Only dsp is from a presonus studiolive mixer installed several years ago when they first came out.

    At the demo the 2x8 was better in every way but we couldn’t get the band together.

    The system was installed when we had preaching, piano, choir and vocalists with tape backing. Now we have a full live band playing a variety of styles (traditional hymns, folk, blues, rock...). This is about as rowdy as we get, but we often have more instruments and vocals:


    I appreciate your input.
     
    WayneP likes this.
  9. WayneP

    WayneP Supporting Member

    Oct 11, 2004
    Corpus Christi, Texas
  10. Wasnex

    Wasnex

    Dec 25, 2011
    Does this include SPL?

    With 120 degrees of horizontal dispersion, if you need more power you would probably go up to the 4x8 or array another 2x8 vertically.

    The 4x8 is the ICLive XL and it lists max SPL as 131dB in whole space, VS 129dB for the ICLive X. Not much of a difference. The big benefit is the XL pushes to low end of it's steering limit and pattern control down an octave. That could make a huge difference in regards to clarity if the worship hall has a lot of ambiance/natural reverb.

    Beam Control: (X model)
    Steerable from 1.5 kHz and up
    Directivity from 750 Hz and up
    When used singly

    Beam Control: (XL model)
    Steerable from 750 Hz and up
    Directivity from 375 Hz and up
    When used singly

    I used to mix on a pair of Apogee AE5s on tripods, left and right of the band. Their max SPL is listed a 131dB. Dispersion is 90x45. I don't think I ever pushed them to their limit indoors.
     
  11. You might want to check into Community speaker boxes; they build some world class boxes.
     
  12. nutdog

    nutdog when I'm a good dog they sometimes throw me a bone

    Feb 19, 2009
    in the dog house
    Thanks, he’s great on lead and rhythm.

    I can’t say for sure about max spl but it got pretty loud.

    I asked him about both options and am waiting on a reply. I like the idea of a pair in case one fails.

    If an install company recommended them I would consider it. Whatever we get I want a pro to hang them. I don’t want the liability and I don’t want to stand under anything I rigged up. :D:eek:
     
    Wasnex, kittywithabanjo and WayneP like this.
  13. Wasnex

    Wasnex

    Dec 25, 2011
    This could come down to budget. When you extract this kind of performance from such a small box, they tend to be pretty expensive. If the church can afford two, it may be possible to hang them in a vertical array with programmed presets that can be engaged to nominalize coverage throughout the hall in the event one fails.
     
  14. It's high end gear for sure. Lets see the Ease Focus plot or whatever sort of modeling software they use. Then you will really be able to know the potential of the system
     
  15. nutdog

    nutdog when I'm a good dog they sometimes throw me a bone

    Feb 19, 2009
    in the dog house
    We don't have anything like that. What I have is the demo with a few people, including the sound co. and renkus reps, walking around saying 'sounds good, should work'. It doesn't leave me with a lot of confidence. I'm going to try to find a company that really knows what they're doing. We're kind of out in the boonies and I don't know if we have the budget stomach for it right now.
     
  16. nutdog

    nutdog when I'm a good dog they sometimes throw me a bone

    Feb 19, 2009
    in the dog house
    The recommendation I expected was more like the arrays in this room. It's similar size to our sanctuary but different shape. Seems like a big difference.

    IMG_0242.jpg
     
  17. Wasnex

    Wasnex

    Dec 25, 2011
    That looks like a very powerful and expensive system. The price for the components and rigging could easily be well over $100K. I would think definitely over $50K. It appears there are nine boxes in each array. Pretty sure the system is not JBL; but as an example, VRX932LAPs run for about $2,600 a piece street.

    I think it's likely the single Renkus would work fine for worship services providing pattern control can be adapted to the space. If the band is rowdy it may not be enough. But you have to consider the budget, intended purpose, and priorities. The dual line array system in your example would be appropriate for a fairly loud rock show. Probably total overkill for a church IMHO unless music is really the focus of your ministry and they have money to burn.

    I would question the efficacy of how the system in your example is installed. The arrays appear to be placed too far back IMHO; although it could be an optical illusion. Do I think this would be a better system. Yes definitely, but can the chapel afford such a system?
     
  18. nutdog

    nutdog when I'm a good dog they sometimes throw me a bone

    Feb 19, 2009
    in the dog house
    Us Presbyterians can't be outgunned by those evil Methodists!:rage: :bassist::bassist::bassist::rage:

    :) Just kidding (sorta:p).

    I just saw that pic the yesterday. I need to check it out and talk to them in person.

    Yes, it's overkill, but 2 vrx per side might be in budget? Music isn't the focus but it's a big part. At least we wouldn't be in a lurch if one failed.
     
  19. I am in this business to a degree. If Im going to a customer trying to sell a system I want to provide something that the customer can look at that shows that I've put more thought into designing the system than just throwing something up that looks cool. I'm not saying that the company you are working with is not qualified, but I personally don't like the "set it up in the space and see how it goes" approach. There's a lot more to system design than that, or should be.

    Ease Focus is a pretty simple program. If your contractors won't make a plot for you, you could do it on your own as all of the software is free. You just need to know the length and width of your space along with where and how high the system will hang. This gives you a birds eye and side view of what the system can do. It doesn't take barriers reflections(walls/ceiling) into account but can show you the raw energy that the system can produce over a range of selected frequencies. I know that renkus makes files available for use in ease.

    images.jpeg

    Every customer gets one of these when I'm selling an installed system and when I'm specing a system for a corporate event. By going through this exercise it gives me confidence that I'm choosing the correct components and also reassures the customer that I'm not just winging it.
     
  20. A system like this may be complete overkill, or it might be just what they wanted. It's easy to look at it and say that the number of boxes is unnecessary, but there's more to the story at times. The more boxes in an array the better the pattern control, specifically in the mid to low midrange. It's very likely that the flown boxes are throttled back quite a bit and are being used mostly to get a smooth response down to the crossover frequency.
     
    nutdog likes this.